Comparative effects of the herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D and paraquat on non-green potato tuber calli

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Peixoto, Francisco P.
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Gomes-Laranjo, José, Vicente, Joaquim A., Madeira, Vítor M. C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/3909
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2007.12.013
Resumo: The effects of the herbicides 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridylium dichloride (paraquat), 3,6-dichloro-2-metoxybenzoic acid (dicamba) and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) on cell growth of non-green potato tuber calli are described. We attempted to relate the effects with toxicity, in particular the enzymes committed to the cellular antioxidant system. Cell cultures were exposed to the herbicides for a period of 4 weeks. Cellular integrity on the basis of fluorescein release was strongly affected by 2,4-D, followed by dicamba, and was not affected by paraquat. However, the three herbicides decreased the energy charge, with paraquat and 2,4-D being very efficient. Paraquat induced catalase (CAT) activity at low concentrations (1 [mu]M), whereas at higher concentrations, inhibition was observed. Dicamba and 2,4-D stimulated CAT as a function of concentration. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was strongly stimulated by paraquat, whereas dicamba and 2,4-D were efficient only at higher concentrations. Glutathione reductase (GR) activity was induced by all the herbicides, suggesting that glutathione and glutathione-dependent enzymes are putatively involved in the detoxification of these herbicides. Paraquat slightly inhibited glutathione S-transferase (GST), whereas 2,4-D and dicamba promoted significant activation. These results indicate that the detoxifying mechanisms for 2,4-D and dicamba may be different from the mechanisms of paraquat detoxification. However, the main cause of cell death induced by paraquat and 2,4-D is putatively related with the cell energy charge decrease.
id RCAP_8bcbb906a9118a50537d00b2660a5de4
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/3909
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparative effects of the herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D and paraquat on non-green potato tuber calliDicambaHerbicideOxidative stressParaquatThe effects of the herbicides 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridylium dichloride (paraquat), 3,6-dichloro-2-metoxybenzoic acid (dicamba) and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) on cell growth of non-green potato tuber calli are described. We attempted to relate the effects with toxicity, in particular the enzymes committed to the cellular antioxidant system. Cell cultures were exposed to the herbicides for a period of 4 weeks. Cellular integrity on the basis of fluorescein release was strongly affected by 2,4-D, followed by dicamba, and was not affected by paraquat. However, the three herbicides decreased the energy charge, with paraquat and 2,4-D being very efficient. Paraquat induced catalase (CAT) activity at low concentrations (1 [mu]M), whereas at higher concentrations, inhibition was observed. Dicamba and 2,4-D stimulated CAT as a function of concentration. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was strongly stimulated by paraquat, whereas dicamba and 2,4-D were efficient only at higher concentrations. Glutathione reductase (GR) activity was induced by all the herbicides, suggesting that glutathione and glutathione-dependent enzymes are putatively involved in the detoxification of these herbicides. Paraquat slightly inhibited glutathione S-transferase (GST), whereas 2,4-D and dicamba promoted significant activation. These results indicate that the detoxifying mechanisms for 2,4-D and dicamba may be different from the mechanisms of paraquat detoxification. However, the main cause of cell death induced by paraquat and 2,4-D is putatively related with the cell energy charge decrease.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B7GJ7-4SBRTGG-2/1/57bc6e71553b233694cdc5be53c9bf612008info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleaplication/PDFhttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/3909http://hdl.handle.net/10316/3909https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2007.12.013engJournal of Plant Physiology. 165:11 (2008) 1125-1133Peixoto, Francisco P.Gomes-Laranjo, JoséVicente, Joaquim A.Madeira, Vítor M. C.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2021-11-09T10:13:09Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/3909Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:55:50.531814Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative effects of the herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D and paraquat on non-green potato tuber calli
title Comparative effects of the herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D and paraquat on non-green potato tuber calli
spellingShingle Comparative effects of the herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D and paraquat on non-green potato tuber calli
Peixoto, Francisco P.
Dicamba
Herbicide
Oxidative stress
Paraquat
title_short Comparative effects of the herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D and paraquat on non-green potato tuber calli
title_full Comparative effects of the herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D and paraquat on non-green potato tuber calli
title_fullStr Comparative effects of the herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D and paraquat on non-green potato tuber calli
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effects of the herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D and paraquat on non-green potato tuber calli
title_sort Comparative effects of the herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D and paraquat on non-green potato tuber calli
author Peixoto, Francisco P.
author_facet Peixoto, Francisco P.
Gomes-Laranjo, José
Vicente, Joaquim A.
Madeira, Vítor M. C.
author_role author
author2 Gomes-Laranjo, José
Vicente, Joaquim A.
Madeira, Vítor M. C.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Peixoto, Francisco P.
Gomes-Laranjo, José
Vicente, Joaquim A.
Madeira, Vítor M. C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dicamba
Herbicide
Oxidative stress
Paraquat
topic Dicamba
Herbicide
Oxidative stress
Paraquat
description The effects of the herbicides 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridylium dichloride (paraquat), 3,6-dichloro-2-metoxybenzoic acid (dicamba) and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) on cell growth of non-green potato tuber calli are described. We attempted to relate the effects with toxicity, in particular the enzymes committed to the cellular antioxidant system. Cell cultures were exposed to the herbicides for a period of 4 weeks. Cellular integrity on the basis of fluorescein release was strongly affected by 2,4-D, followed by dicamba, and was not affected by paraquat. However, the three herbicides decreased the energy charge, with paraquat and 2,4-D being very efficient. Paraquat induced catalase (CAT) activity at low concentrations (1 [mu]M), whereas at higher concentrations, inhibition was observed. Dicamba and 2,4-D stimulated CAT as a function of concentration. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was strongly stimulated by paraquat, whereas dicamba and 2,4-D were efficient only at higher concentrations. Glutathione reductase (GR) activity was induced by all the herbicides, suggesting that glutathione and glutathione-dependent enzymes are putatively involved in the detoxification of these herbicides. Paraquat slightly inhibited glutathione S-transferase (GST), whereas 2,4-D and dicamba promoted significant activation. These results indicate that the detoxifying mechanisms for 2,4-D and dicamba may be different from the mechanisms of paraquat detoxification. However, the main cause of cell death induced by paraquat and 2,4-D is putatively related with the cell energy charge decrease.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/3909
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/3909
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2007.12.013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/3909
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2007.12.013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Plant Physiology. 165:11 (2008) 1125-1133
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv aplication/PDF
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133844363804672