Ambiguities and aporias in the concept of nature within the bioethical debate

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendonça, Marta Maria Anjos Galego de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/98423
Resumo: UID/HIS/04666/2013
id RCAP_8d0ebfdc9eea311c80df714933b3d624
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/98423
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Ambiguities and aporias in the concept of nature within the bioethical debateNatureBioethicUID/HIS/04666/2013Bioethics is one of the domains where the concept of nature is most intensely discussed. This fact is somewhat paradoxical, especially if we take into account that, upon its creation, bioethics has sought to remove philosophical aspects from the issues it has raised. To illustrate the centrality of the concept of nature in bioethics, it suffices to analyse the way the discussion has changed in recent decades: a) initially, it was obvious that all human beings are rational beings and that this fact endowed them with an exclusive status conferring certain rights. Based on this evidence, bioethics attempted to determine these rights and the duties arising from these in the domain of Biomedicine; b) presently, however, the way in which we should deal with rational beings, their rights and our obligations, seems evident. The discussion will now consider the subjects bearing this status: is this an exclusive status for human beings? Does it extend to them all? The text deals with the concept of nature which was adopted in the early bioethical literature; it explores the way it determined this change in the focus of the debate and identifies some of its most significant implications.CHAM - Centro de HumanidadesRUNMendonça, Marta Maria Anjos Galego de2020-05-27T22:40:12Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article15application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/98423eng2498-9746PURE: 4005153https://doi.org/10.17421/2498-9746-03-13info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:45:07Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/98423Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:38:58.887465Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ambiguities and aporias in the concept of nature within the bioethical debate
title Ambiguities and aporias in the concept of nature within the bioethical debate
spellingShingle Ambiguities and aporias in the concept of nature within the bioethical debate
Mendonça, Marta Maria Anjos Galego de
Nature
Bioethic
title_short Ambiguities and aporias in the concept of nature within the bioethical debate
title_full Ambiguities and aporias in the concept of nature within the bioethical debate
title_fullStr Ambiguities and aporias in the concept of nature within the bioethical debate
title_full_unstemmed Ambiguities and aporias in the concept of nature within the bioethical debate
title_sort Ambiguities and aporias in the concept of nature within the bioethical debate
author Mendonça, Marta Maria Anjos Galego de
author_facet Mendonça, Marta Maria Anjos Galego de
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv CHAM - Centro de Humanidades
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendonça, Marta Maria Anjos Galego de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nature
Bioethic
topic Nature
Bioethic
description UID/HIS/04666/2013
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020-05-27T22:40:12Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/98423
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/98423
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2498-9746
PURE: 4005153
https://doi.org/10.17421/2498-9746-03-13
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 15
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138006116859904

Registros relacionados