Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/3910 |
Resumo: | Background: Several interventions have been used to relieve chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study aimed to compare the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) followed by motor control exercises (MCEs) with core stability training (CST) on pain, disability, and balance in women with CLBP. Methods: Thirty-seven women with CLBP were randomly divided into two groups of PNE/MCE (n = 18, 55.2 ± 2.6 years) or CST (n = 19, 54.6 ± 2.4 years). Eight weeks of PNE/MCE or CST were prescribed for each group, independently. Pain intensity (VAS scale), disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), unipodal static balance, and dynamic balance (time up and go test) were measured at the beginning and 8 weeks after the intervention. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the results with alpha of 5%. Results: After 8 weeks, there was a significant difference in VAS scale between groups (p = 0.024), with both PNE/MCE and CST showing 58% and 42% reductions, respectively. There were no differences for all other variables between groups. Regarding pre- to post-comparisons, both groups showed improvements in all dependent variables (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The treatment with PNE/MCE was more effective in improving pain disability and unipodal static and dynamic balance than treatment with CST. Even so, both treatments were shown to be valid and safe in improving all dependent variables analyzed in women with CLBP. |
id |
RCAP_8d38f1990f9105776630ae7cd51687a9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ipsantarem.pt:10400.15/3910 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back paintherapeutic interventionnon-pharmacologic treatmentnon-surgical treatmentfemaleagilitybalanceBackground: Several interventions have been used to relieve chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study aimed to compare the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) followed by motor control exercises (MCEs) with core stability training (CST) on pain, disability, and balance in women with CLBP. Methods: Thirty-seven women with CLBP were randomly divided into two groups of PNE/MCE (n = 18, 55.2 ± 2.6 years) or CST (n = 19, 54.6 ± 2.4 years). Eight weeks of PNE/MCE or CST were prescribed for each group, independently. Pain intensity (VAS scale), disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), unipodal static balance, and dynamic balance (time up and go test) were measured at the beginning and 8 weeks after the intervention. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the results with alpha of 5%. Results: After 8 weeks, there was a significant difference in VAS scale between groups (p = 0.024), with both PNE/MCE and CST showing 58% and 42% reductions, respectively. There were no differences for all other variables between groups. Regarding pre- to post-comparisons, both groups showed improvements in all dependent variables (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The treatment with PNE/MCE was more effective in improving pain disability and unipodal static and dynamic balance than treatment with CST. Even so, both treatments were shown to be valid and safe in improving all dependent variables analyzed in women with CLBP.MDPIRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de SantarémGorji, Sahar ModaresMohammadi Nia Samakosh, HadiWatt, PeterHenrique Marchetti, PauloOliveira, Rafael2022-03-15T18:06:46Z2022-022022-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/3910eng: Gorji, S.M.; Mohammadi Nia Samakosh, H.; Watt, P.; Henrique Marchetti, P. & Oliveira, R. (2022).Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 2694. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph190526941660-460110.3390/ijerph19052694info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-21T07:36:17Zoai:repositorio.ipsantarem.pt:10400.15/3910Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:55:35.755251Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain |
title |
Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain |
spellingShingle |
Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain Gorji, Sahar Modares therapeutic intervention non-pharmacologic treatment non-surgical treatment female agility balance |
title_short |
Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain |
title_full |
Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain |
title_fullStr |
Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain |
title_sort |
Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain |
author |
Gorji, Sahar Modares |
author_facet |
Gorji, Sahar Modares Mohammadi Nia Samakosh, Hadi Watt, Peter Henrique Marchetti, Paulo Oliveira, Rafael |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mohammadi Nia Samakosh, Hadi Watt, Peter Henrique Marchetti, Paulo Oliveira, Rafael |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gorji, Sahar Modares Mohammadi Nia Samakosh, Hadi Watt, Peter Henrique Marchetti, Paulo Oliveira, Rafael |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
therapeutic intervention non-pharmacologic treatment non-surgical treatment female agility balance |
topic |
therapeutic intervention non-pharmacologic treatment non-surgical treatment female agility balance |
description |
Background: Several interventions have been used to relieve chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study aimed to compare the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) followed by motor control exercises (MCEs) with core stability training (CST) on pain, disability, and balance in women with CLBP. Methods: Thirty-seven women with CLBP were randomly divided into two groups of PNE/MCE (n = 18, 55.2 ± 2.6 years) or CST (n = 19, 54.6 ± 2.4 years). Eight weeks of PNE/MCE or CST were prescribed for each group, independently. Pain intensity (VAS scale), disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), unipodal static balance, and dynamic balance (time up and go test) were measured at the beginning and 8 weeks after the intervention. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the results with alpha of 5%. Results: After 8 weeks, there was a significant difference in VAS scale between groups (p = 0.024), with both PNE/MCE and CST showing 58% and 42% reductions, respectively. There were no differences for all other variables between groups. Regarding pre- to post-comparisons, both groups showed improvements in all dependent variables (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The treatment with PNE/MCE was more effective in improving pain disability and unipodal static and dynamic balance than treatment with CST. Even so, both treatments were shown to be valid and safe in improving all dependent variables analyzed in women with CLBP. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-15T18:06:46Z 2022-02 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/3910 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/3910 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
: Gorji, S.M.; Mohammadi Nia Samakosh, H.; Watt, P.; Henrique Marchetti, P. & Oliveira, R. (2022).Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 2694. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052694 1660-4601 10.3390/ijerph19052694 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137045591883776 |