Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gorji, Sahar Modares
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Mohammadi Nia Samakosh, Hadi, Watt, Peter, Henrique Marchetti, Paulo, Oliveira, Rafael
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/3910
Resumo: Background: Several interventions have been used to relieve chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study aimed to compare the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) followed by motor control exercises (MCEs) with core stability training (CST) on pain, disability, and balance in women with CLBP. Methods: Thirty-seven women with CLBP were randomly divided into two groups of PNE/MCE (n = 18, 55.2 ± 2.6 years) or CST (n = 19, 54.6 ± 2.4 years). Eight weeks of PNE/MCE or CST were prescribed for each group, independently. Pain intensity (VAS scale), disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), unipodal static balance, and dynamic balance (time up and go test) were measured at the beginning and 8 weeks after the intervention. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the results with alpha of 5%. Results: After 8 weeks, there was a significant difference in VAS scale between groups (p = 0.024), with both PNE/MCE and CST showing 58% and 42% reductions, respectively. There were no differences for all other variables between groups. Regarding pre- to post-comparisons, both groups showed improvements in all dependent variables (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The treatment with PNE/MCE was more effective in improving pain disability and unipodal static and dynamic balance than treatment with CST. Even so, both treatments were shown to be valid and safe in improving all dependent variables analyzed in women with CLBP.
id RCAP_8d38f1990f9105776630ae7cd51687a9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipsantarem.pt:10400.15/3910
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back paintherapeutic interventionnon-pharmacologic treatmentnon-surgical treatmentfemaleagilitybalanceBackground: Several interventions have been used to relieve chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study aimed to compare the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) followed by motor control exercises (MCEs) with core stability training (CST) on pain, disability, and balance in women with CLBP. Methods: Thirty-seven women with CLBP were randomly divided into two groups of PNE/MCE (n = 18, 55.2 ± 2.6 years) or CST (n = 19, 54.6 ± 2.4 years). Eight weeks of PNE/MCE or CST were prescribed for each group, independently. Pain intensity (VAS scale), disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), unipodal static balance, and dynamic balance (time up and go test) were measured at the beginning and 8 weeks after the intervention. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the results with alpha of 5%. Results: After 8 weeks, there was a significant difference in VAS scale between groups (p = 0.024), with both PNE/MCE and CST showing 58% and 42% reductions, respectively. There were no differences for all other variables between groups. Regarding pre- to post-comparisons, both groups showed improvements in all dependent variables (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The treatment with PNE/MCE was more effective in improving pain disability and unipodal static and dynamic balance than treatment with CST. Even so, both treatments were shown to be valid and safe in improving all dependent variables analyzed in women with CLBP.MDPIRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de SantarémGorji, Sahar ModaresMohammadi Nia Samakosh, HadiWatt, PeterHenrique Marchetti, PauloOliveira, Rafael2022-03-15T18:06:46Z2022-022022-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/3910eng: Gorji, S.M.; Mohammadi Nia Samakosh, H.; Watt, P.; Henrique Marchetti, P. & Oliveira, R. (2022).Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 2694. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph190526941660-460110.3390/ijerph19052694info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-21T07:36:17Zoai:repositorio.ipsantarem.pt:10400.15/3910Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:55:35.755251Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain
title Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain
spellingShingle Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain
Gorji, Sahar Modares
therapeutic intervention
non-pharmacologic treatment
non-surgical treatment
female
agility
balance
title_short Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain
title_full Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain
title_fullStr Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain
title_sort Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women with chronic low back pain
author Gorji, Sahar Modares
author_facet Gorji, Sahar Modares
Mohammadi Nia Samakosh, Hadi
Watt, Peter
Henrique Marchetti, Paulo
Oliveira, Rafael
author_role author
author2 Mohammadi Nia Samakosh, Hadi
Watt, Peter
Henrique Marchetti, Paulo
Oliveira, Rafael
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gorji, Sahar Modares
Mohammadi Nia Samakosh, Hadi
Watt, Peter
Henrique Marchetti, Paulo
Oliveira, Rafael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv therapeutic intervention
non-pharmacologic treatment
non-surgical treatment
female
agility
balance
topic therapeutic intervention
non-pharmacologic treatment
non-surgical treatment
female
agility
balance
description Background: Several interventions have been used to relieve chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study aimed to compare the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) followed by motor control exercises (MCEs) with core stability training (CST) on pain, disability, and balance in women with CLBP. Methods: Thirty-seven women with CLBP were randomly divided into two groups of PNE/MCE (n = 18, 55.2 ± 2.6 years) or CST (n = 19, 54.6 ± 2.4 years). Eight weeks of PNE/MCE or CST were prescribed for each group, independently. Pain intensity (VAS scale), disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), unipodal static balance, and dynamic balance (time up and go test) were measured at the beginning and 8 weeks after the intervention. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the results with alpha of 5%. Results: After 8 weeks, there was a significant difference in VAS scale between groups (p = 0.024), with both PNE/MCE and CST showing 58% and 42% reductions, respectively. There were no differences for all other variables between groups. Regarding pre- to post-comparisons, both groups showed improvements in all dependent variables (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The treatment with PNE/MCE was more effective in improving pain disability and unipodal static and dynamic balance than treatment with CST. Even so, both treatments were shown to be valid and safe in improving all dependent variables analyzed in women with CLBP.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-15T18:06:46Z
2022-02
2022-02-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/3910
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/3910
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv : Gorji, S.M.; Mohammadi Nia Samakosh, H.; Watt, P.; Henrique Marchetti, P. & Oliveira, R. (2022).Pain neuroscience education and motor control exercises versus core stability exercises on pain, disability, and balance in women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 2694. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052694
1660-4601
10.3390/ijerph19052694
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137045591883776