Going beyond classic echo in aortic stenosis: left atrial mechanics, a new marker of severity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques-Alves, Patricia
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Marinho, Ana Vera, Teixeira, Rogério, Baptista, Rui, Castro, Graça, Martins, Rui, Gonçalves, Lino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106831
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1204-2
Resumo: Background: There is limited information regarding left atrial (LA) mechanics in aortic valve stenosis (AS). We assessed LA mechanics in AS through speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) according to severity and prognosis. Methods: We included 102 patients diagnosed with severe AS (sAS) and 80 patients with moderate AS (mAS), all with preserved ejection fraction and no coronary artery disease. LA mechanics and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) were assessed by STE. The cohort was followed-up for a median of 30 (IQR 12.6–50) months, and outcomes were determined (combined outcome of HF, death, and aortic valve replacement). Results: In our sample set, values of LV-GLS (− 18.5% vs − 17.1, p = 0.025), E/e’ ratio (15.8 vs 18.4, p = 0.03), and global LA mechanics (LA ɛsys, 23% vs 13.8%, p < 0.001) were worse for sAS compared to those for mAS. However, LA ɛsys (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.78–0.90, p < 0.001), ɛe (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.88, p < 0.001), and ɛa (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.84, p < 0.001) were the best discriminators of sAS, with sensitivities higher than 85%. LA ɛsys showed a stronger correlation with both aortic valve area (r2 = 0.6, p < 0.001) and mean LV/aortic gradient (r2 = 0.55, p < 0.001) than LV-GLS (r2 = 0.3 and r2 = 0.25, p = 0.01). Either LV-GLS or LA ɛsys, but not the E/e’ ratio, TAPSE, or RV/RA gradient, were a significant predictors of the combined outcome. Conclusions: LA global strain was the best discriminator of severity, surpassing E/e’ ratio and LV-GLS, and a significant predictor of prognosis in AS.
id RCAP_8d57c248aaafacc3c1f56856f653917b
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/106831
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Going beyond classic echo in aortic stenosis: left atrial mechanics, a new marker of severityAortic stenosisatrial mechanicstwo-dimensional speckle-tracking strainBackground: There is limited information regarding left atrial (LA) mechanics in aortic valve stenosis (AS). We assessed LA mechanics in AS through speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) according to severity and prognosis. Methods: We included 102 patients diagnosed with severe AS (sAS) and 80 patients with moderate AS (mAS), all with preserved ejection fraction and no coronary artery disease. LA mechanics and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) were assessed by STE. The cohort was followed-up for a median of 30 (IQR 12.6–50) months, and outcomes were determined (combined outcome of HF, death, and aortic valve replacement). Results: In our sample set, values of LV-GLS (− 18.5% vs − 17.1, p = 0.025), E/e’ ratio (15.8 vs 18.4, p = 0.03), and global LA mechanics (LA ɛsys, 23% vs 13.8%, p < 0.001) were worse for sAS compared to those for mAS. However, LA ɛsys (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.78–0.90, p < 0.001), ɛe (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.88, p < 0.001), and ɛa (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.84, p < 0.001) were the best discriminators of sAS, with sensitivities higher than 85%. LA ɛsys showed a stronger correlation with both aortic valve area (r2 = 0.6, p < 0.001) and mean LV/aortic gradient (r2 = 0.55, p < 0.001) than LV-GLS (r2 = 0.3 and r2 = 0.25, p = 0.01). Either LV-GLS or LA ɛsys, but not the E/e’ ratio, TAPSE, or RV/RA gradient, were a significant predictors of the combined outcome. Conclusions: LA global strain was the best discriminator of severity, surpassing E/e’ ratio and LV-GLS, and a significant predictor of prognosis in AS.Springer Nature2019-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/106831http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106831https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1204-2eng1471-2261316011851471-2261Marques-Alves, PatriciaMarinho, Ana VeraTeixeira, RogérioBaptista, RuiCastro, GraçaMartins, RuiGonçalves, Linoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-04-26T09:04:47Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/106831Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:23:13.754800Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Going beyond classic echo in aortic stenosis: left atrial mechanics, a new marker of severity
title Going beyond classic echo in aortic stenosis: left atrial mechanics, a new marker of severity
spellingShingle Going beyond classic echo in aortic stenosis: left atrial mechanics, a new marker of severity
Marques-Alves, Patricia
Aortic stenosis
atrial mechanics
two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain
title_short Going beyond classic echo in aortic stenosis: left atrial mechanics, a new marker of severity
title_full Going beyond classic echo in aortic stenosis: left atrial mechanics, a new marker of severity
title_fullStr Going beyond classic echo in aortic stenosis: left atrial mechanics, a new marker of severity
title_full_unstemmed Going beyond classic echo in aortic stenosis: left atrial mechanics, a new marker of severity
title_sort Going beyond classic echo in aortic stenosis: left atrial mechanics, a new marker of severity
author Marques-Alves, Patricia
author_facet Marques-Alves, Patricia
Marinho, Ana Vera
Teixeira, Rogério
Baptista, Rui
Castro, Graça
Martins, Rui
Gonçalves, Lino
author_role author
author2 Marinho, Ana Vera
Teixeira, Rogério
Baptista, Rui
Castro, Graça
Martins, Rui
Gonçalves, Lino
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques-Alves, Patricia
Marinho, Ana Vera
Teixeira, Rogério
Baptista, Rui
Castro, Graça
Martins, Rui
Gonçalves, Lino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aortic stenosis
atrial mechanics
two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain
topic Aortic stenosis
atrial mechanics
two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain
description Background: There is limited information regarding left atrial (LA) mechanics in aortic valve stenosis (AS). We assessed LA mechanics in AS through speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) according to severity and prognosis. Methods: We included 102 patients diagnosed with severe AS (sAS) and 80 patients with moderate AS (mAS), all with preserved ejection fraction and no coronary artery disease. LA mechanics and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) were assessed by STE. The cohort was followed-up for a median of 30 (IQR 12.6–50) months, and outcomes were determined (combined outcome of HF, death, and aortic valve replacement). Results: In our sample set, values of LV-GLS (− 18.5% vs − 17.1, p = 0.025), E/e’ ratio (15.8 vs 18.4, p = 0.03), and global LA mechanics (LA ɛsys, 23% vs 13.8%, p < 0.001) were worse for sAS compared to those for mAS. However, LA ɛsys (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.78–0.90, p < 0.001), ɛe (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.88, p < 0.001), and ɛa (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.84, p < 0.001) were the best discriminators of sAS, with sensitivities higher than 85%. LA ɛsys showed a stronger correlation with both aortic valve area (r2 = 0.6, p < 0.001) and mean LV/aortic gradient (r2 = 0.55, p < 0.001) than LV-GLS (r2 = 0.3 and r2 = 0.25, p = 0.01). Either LV-GLS or LA ɛsys, but not the E/e’ ratio, TAPSE, or RV/RA gradient, were a significant predictors of the combined outcome. Conclusions: LA global strain was the best discriminator of severity, surpassing E/e’ ratio and LV-GLS, and a significant predictor of prognosis in AS.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-10
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106831
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106831
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1204-2
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106831
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1204-2
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1471-2261
31601185
1471-2261
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134120124612608