On the analysis of masonry structures without box behavior
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/14786 |
Resumo: | Assessment of the seismic performance of structures is still challenge. Historic masonry structures exhibit peculiar properties (low tensile strength and lack of box behavior) that make the task of the analyst even more difficult. It seems that traditional design and assessment methods, similar to the ones currently used for reinforced concrete structures, are not applicable. This paper provides a review of the seismic analysis of masonry structures without box behavior. Different methods of structural analysis are discussed and a comparison is made between pushover methods and non-linear dynamic analysis with time integration. Three cases studies (S. Torcato church, Qutb Minar and “Gaioleiros” buildings) were used and the results show that traditional, adaptive or modal pushover analyses are not totally in agreement with non-linear dynamic analysis or experimental observations, namely cycle and rigid block behavior (rocking) and the out-of-plane behavior. |
id |
RCAP_8e0d000ca7ab1ea64e51345f87fb9c49 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/14786 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
On the analysis of masonry structures without box behaviorMasonry structuresBox behaviorSeismic performanceStatic and dynamic non-linear analysispushover analysisdynamic non-linear analysisArts & HumanitiesScience & TechnologyAssessment of the seismic performance of structures is still challenge. Historic masonry structures exhibit peculiar properties (low tensile strength and lack of box behavior) that make the task of the analyst even more difficult. It seems that traditional design and assessment methods, similar to the ones currently used for reinforced concrete structures, are not applicable. This paper provides a review of the seismic analysis of masonry structures without box behavior. Different methods of structural analysis are discussed and a comparison is made between pushover methods and non-linear dynamic analysis with time integration. Three cases studies (S. Torcato church, Qutb Minar and “Gaioleiros” buildings) were used and the results show that traditional, adaptive or modal pushover analyses are not totally in agreement with non-linear dynamic analysis or experimental observations, namely cycle and rigid block behavior (rocking) and the out-of-plane behavior.The present work is partly funded by FCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology), through project POCI/ECM/61671/2004, "Seismic vulnerability reduction of old masonry buildings" and project PTDC-ECM-68188-2006, "Innovative solutions for non-load bearing masonry infills".Taylor and FrancisUniversidade do MinhoLourenço, Paulo B.Mendes, N.Ramos, Luís F.Oliveira, Daniel V.20112011-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/14786eng1558-305810.1080/15583058.2010.528824http://www.tandfonline.com/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:23:47Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/14786Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:17:36.650617Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On the analysis of masonry structures without box behavior |
title |
On the analysis of masonry structures without box behavior |
spellingShingle |
On the analysis of masonry structures without box behavior Lourenço, Paulo B. Masonry structures Box behavior Seismic performance Static and dynamic non-linear analysis pushover analysis dynamic non-linear analysis Arts & Humanities Science & Technology |
title_short |
On the analysis of masonry structures without box behavior |
title_full |
On the analysis of masonry structures without box behavior |
title_fullStr |
On the analysis of masonry structures without box behavior |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the analysis of masonry structures without box behavior |
title_sort |
On the analysis of masonry structures without box behavior |
author |
Lourenço, Paulo B. |
author_facet |
Lourenço, Paulo B. Mendes, N. Ramos, Luís F. Oliveira, Daniel V. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mendes, N. Ramos, Luís F. Oliveira, Daniel V. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lourenço, Paulo B. Mendes, N. Ramos, Luís F. Oliveira, Daniel V. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Masonry structures Box behavior Seismic performance Static and dynamic non-linear analysis pushover analysis dynamic non-linear analysis Arts & Humanities Science & Technology |
topic |
Masonry structures Box behavior Seismic performance Static and dynamic non-linear analysis pushover analysis dynamic non-linear analysis Arts & Humanities Science & Technology |
description |
Assessment of the seismic performance of structures is still challenge. Historic masonry structures exhibit peculiar properties (low tensile strength and lack of box behavior) that make the task of the analyst even more difficult. It seems that traditional design and assessment methods, similar to the ones currently used for reinforced concrete structures, are not applicable. This paper provides a review of the seismic analysis of masonry structures without box behavior. Different methods of structural analysis are discussed and a comparison is made between pushover methods and non-linear dynamic analysis with time integration. Three cases studies (S. Torcato church, Qutb Minar and “Gaioleiros” buildings) were used and the results show that traditional, adaptive or modal pushover analyses are not totally in agreement with non-linear dynamic analysis or experimental observations, namely cycle and rigid block behavior (rocking) and the out-of-plane behavior. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/14786 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/14786 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1558-3058 10.1080/15583058.2010.528824 http://www.tandfonline.com/ |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor and Francis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor and Francis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132628655276032 |