Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83570 |
Resumo: | On the 18th of September 2014, Scottish voters have rejected political independence by a margin of 55,3% against 44,7%. Yet during more than 16 weeks, two opposing campaigns - Yes Scotland versus Better Together - have strived to convince Scotland that political independence versus keeping the Union was the best choice for Scotland’s future. Filled with many unexpected moments, the campaign was intense, vibrant and almost breathtaking. The purpose of this article is to deliver a coherent and consistent account of the Scottish campaigns in order to make sense of the “no” vote. In this article, we will proceed in four moments: first, we will put the referendum in context; second, we will highlight major aspects of the campaigns; third, we will bring the political process up to date and will clarify the terms of the agreement reached under the Smith Process. Finally, in the last part, we will summarize the lessons to learn from the political outcome of the referendum. |
id |
RCAP_8ede6fc1696b68e4f814254e61d8f85f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/83570 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?Ciências Sociais::Ciências PolíticasOn the 18th of September 2014, Scottish voters have rejected political independence by a margin of 55,3% against 44,7%. Yet during more than 16 weeks, two opposing campaigns - Yes Scotland versus Better Together - have strived to convince Scotland that political independence versus keeping the Union was the best choice for Scotland’s future. Filled with many unexpected moments, the campaign was intense, vibrant and almost breathtaking. The purpose of this article is to deliver a coherent and consistent account of the Scottish campaigns in order to make sense of the “no” vote. In this article, we will proceed in four moments: first, we will put the referendum in context; second, we will highlight major aspects of the campaigns; third, we will bring the political process up to date and will clarify the terms of the agreement reached under the Smith Process. Finally, in the last part, we will summarize the lessons to learn from the political outcome of the referendum.Universidade do MinhoCortizas, Carlos NeiraAntunes, Sandrina20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/83570enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-23T01:29:04Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/83570Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:02:59.504999Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen? |
title |
Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen? |
spellingShingle |
Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen? Cortizas, Carlos Neira Ciências Sociais::Ciências Políticas |
title_short |
Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen? |
title_full |
Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen? |
title_fullStr |
Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen? |
title_sort |
Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen? |
author |
Cortizas, Carlos Neira |
author_facet |
Cortizas, Carlos Neira Antunes, Sandrina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Antunes, Sandrina |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cortizas, Carlos Neira Antunes, Sandrina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ciências Sociais::Ciências Políticas |
topic |
Ciências Sociais::Ciências Políticas |
description |
On the 18th of September 2014, Scottish voters have rejected political independence by a margin of 55,3% against 44,7%. Yet during more than 16 weeks, two opposing campaigns - Yes Scotland versus Better Together - have strived to convince Scotland that political independence versus keeping the Union was the best choice for Scotland’s future. Filled with many unexpected moments, the campaign was intense, vibrant and almost breathtaking. The purpose of this article is to deliver a coherent and consistent account of the Scottish campaigns in order to make sense of the “no” vote. In this article, we will proceed in four moments: first, we will put the referendum in context; second, we will highlight major aspects of the campaigns; third, we will bring the political process up to date and will clarify the terms of the agreement reached under the Smith Process. Finally, in the last part, we will summarize the lessons to learn from the political outcome of the referendum. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83570 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83570 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132434346803200 |