Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cortizas, Carlos Neira
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Antunes, Sandrina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83570
Resumo: On the 18th of September 2014, Scottish voters have rejected political independence by a margin of 55,3% against 44,7%. Yet during more than 16 weeks, two opposing campaigns - Yes Scotland versus Better Together - have strived to convince Scotland that political independence versus keeping the Union was the best choice for Scotland’s future. Filled with many unexpected moments, the campaign was intense, vibrant and almost breathtaking. The purpose of this article is to deliver a coherent and consistent account of the Scottish campaigns in order to make sense of the “no” vote. In this article, we will proceed in four moments: first, we will put the referendum in context; second, we will highlight major aspects of the campaigns; third, we will bring the political process up to date and will clarify the terms of the agreement reached under the Smith Process. Finally, in the last part, we will summarize the lessons to learn from the political outcome of the referendum.
id RCAP_8ede6fc1696b68e4f814254e61d8f85f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/83570
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?Ciências Sociais::Ciências PolíticasOn the 18th of September 2014, Scottish voters have rejected political independence by a margin of 55,3% against 44,7%. Yet during more than 16 weeks, two opposing campaigns - Yes Scotland versus Better Together - have strived to convince Scotland that political independence versus keeping the Union was the best choice for Scotland’s future. Filled with many unexpected moments, the campaign was intense, vibrant and almost breathtaking. The purpose of this article is to deliver a coherent and consistent account of the Scottish campaigns in order to make sense of the “no” vote. In this article, we will proceed in four moments: first, we will put the referendum in context; second, we will highlight major aspects of the campaigns; third, we will bring the political process up to date and will clarify the terms of the agreement reached under the Smith Process. Finally, in the last part, we will summarize the lessons to learn from the political outcome of the referendum.Universidade do MinhoCortizas, Carlos NeiraAntunes, Sandrina20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/83570enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-23T01:29:04Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/83570Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:02:59.504999Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?
title Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?
spellingShingle Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?
Cortizas, Carlos Neira
Ciências Sociais::Ciências Políticas
title_short Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?
title_full Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?
title_fullStr Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?
title_full_unstemmed Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?
title_sort Yes scotland versus better together: how did it all happen?
author Cortizas, Carlos Neira
author_facet Cortizas, Carlos Neira
Antunes, Sandrina
author_role author
author2 Antunes, Sandrina
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cortizas, Carlos Neira
Antunes, Sandrina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ciências Sociais::Ciências Políticas
topic Ciências Sociais::Ciências Políticas
description On the 18th of September 2014, Scottish voters have rejected political independence by a margin of 55,3% against 44,7%. Yet during more than 16 weeks, two opposing campaigns - Yes Scotland versus Better Together - have strived to convince Scotland that political independence versus keeping the Union was the best choice for Scotland’s future. Filled with many unexpected moments, the campaign was intense, vibrant and almost breathtaking. The purpose of this article is to deliver a coherent and consistent account of the Scottish campaigns in order to make sense of the “no” vote. In this article, we will proceed in four moments: first, we will put the referendum in context; second, we will highlight major aspects of the campaigns; third, we will bring the political process up to date and will clarify the terms of the agreement reached under the Smith Process. Finally, in the last part, we will summarize the lessons to learn from the political outcome of the referendum.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83570
url https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83570
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132434346803200