Could alarmingly high rates of negative diagnoses in remote rural areas be minimized with liquid-based citology? preliminary results from the RODEO study team

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fregnani, José Humberto
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Neto, Cristovam Scapulatempo, Haikel Junior, Raphael L., Saccheto, T., Campacci, N., Mauad, Edmund C., Longatto Filho, Adhemar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/25113
Resumo: Objective: It was the aim of this study to compare diagnostic performances of the BD SurePath (TM) liquid-based Papanicolaou test (LBC) and the conventional Papanicolaou test (CPT) in cervical samples of women from remote rural areas of Brazil. Study Design: Specimens were collected by mobile units provided by Barretos Cancer Hospital. This report evaluates the manual screening arm of the RODEO study. Of 12,048 women seen between May and December 2010, 6,001 were examined using LBC and 6,047 using CPT. Results: Comparative (LBC vs. CPT) outcomes were: all abnormal tests, 2.1 versus 1.0%; ASC-US (atypical squannous cells of unknown significance), 0.7 versus 0.1%; ASC-H (atypical squamous cells with possible high-grade squannous intraepithelial lesions) and AGC (atypical glandular cells), 0.4 versus 0.3%; LSIL (low-grade squannous intraepithelial lesions), 0.7 versus 0.3%; HSIL (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions), 0.4 versus 0.2%, and unsatisfactory, 0.03 versus 0.08%. The LBC arm detected significantly more lesions (ASC-US+) than CPT (p < 0.001); however, when we divided the diagnoses into two groups, ASC-H (negative/ASC-US/LSIL) and ASC-H+ (ASC-H/AGC/HSIL), the difference was not statistically important (p = 0.213). Conclusions: With inherent difficulties in patient recruitment and patient compliance with cancer screening, best test performance including human papillomavirus test capability are vitally necessary in Brazil's struggle to reduce cervical cancer.
id RCAP_9327f0659d7ff78f99c69207f735b693
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/25113
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Could alarmingly high rates of negative diagnoses in remote rural areas be minimized with liquid-based citology? preliminary results from the RODEO study teamCytologyPapanicolaou testSurePathCytological screeningLiquid-based cytologyScience & TechnologyObjective: It was the aim of this study to compare diagnostic performances of the BD SurePath (TM) liquid-based Papanicolaou test (LBC) and the conventional Papanicolaou test (CPT) in cervical samples of women from remote rural areas of Brazil. Study Design: Specimens were collected by mobile units provided by Barretos Cancer Hospital. This report evaluates the manual screening arm of the RODEO study. Of 12,048 women seen between May and December 2010, 6,001 were examined using LBC and 6,047 using CPT. Results: Comparative (LBC vs. CPT) outcomes were: all abnormal tests, 2.1 versus 1.0%; ASC-US (atypical squannous cells of unknown significance), 0.7 versus 0.1%; ASC-H (atypical squamous cells with possible high-grade squannous intraepithelial lesions) and AGC (atypical glandular cells), 0.4 versus 0.3%; LSIL (low-grade squannous intraepithelial lesions), 0.7 versus 0.3%; HSIL (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions), 0.4 versus 0.2%, and unsatisfactory, 0.03 versus 0.08%. The LBC arm detected significantly more lesions (ASC-US+) than CPT (p < 0.001); however, when we divided the diagnoses into two groups, ASC-H (negative/ASC-US/LSIL) and ASC-H+ (ASC-H/AGC/HSIL), the difference was not statistically important (p = 0.213). Conclusions: With inherent difficulties in patient recruitment and patient compliance with cancer screening, best test performance including human papillomavirus test capability are vitally necessary in Brazil's struggle to reduce cervical cancer.Karger AGUniversidade do MinhoFregnani, José HumbertoNeto, Cristovam ScapulatempoHaikel Junior, Raphael L.Saccheto, T.Campacci, N.Mauad, Edmund C.Longatto Filho, Adhemar2013-01-012013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/25113eng0001-554710.1159/00034304623221353http://www.acta-cytol.cominfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:50:12Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/25113Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:48:52.141680Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Could alarmingly high rates of negative diagnoses in remote rural areas be minimized with liquid-based citology? preliminary results from the RODEO study team
title Could alarmingly high rates of negative diagnoses in remote rural areas be minimized with liquid-based citology? preliminary results from the RODEO study team
spellingShingle Could alarmingly high rates of negative diagnoses in remote rural areas be minimized with liquid-based citology? preliminary results from the RODEO study team
Fregnani, José Humberto
Cytology
Papanicolaou test
SurePath
Cytological screening
Liquid-based cytology
Science & Technology
title_short Could alarmingly high rates of negative diagnoses in remote rural areas be minimized with liquid-based citology? preliminary results from the RODEO study team
title_full Could alarmingly high rates of negative diagnoses in remote rural areas be minimized with liquid-based citology? preliminary results from the RODEO study team
title_fullStr Could alarmingly high rates of negative diagnoses in remote rural areas be minimized with liquid-based citology? preliminary results from the RODEO study team
title_full_unstemmed Could alarmingly high rates of negative diagnoses in remote rural areas be minimized with liquid-based citology? preliminary results from the RODEO study team
title_sort Could alarmingly high rates of negative diagnoses in remote rural areas be minimized with liquid-based citology? preliminary results from the RODEO study team
author Fregnani, José Humberto
author_facet Fregnani, José Humberto
Neto, Cristovam Scapulatempo
Haikel Junior, Raphael L.
Saccheto, T.
Campacci, N.
Mauad, Edmund C.
Longatto Filho, Adhemar
author_role author
author2 Neto, Cristovam Scapulatempo
Haikel Junior, Raphael L.
Saccheto, T.
Campacci, N.
Mauad, Edmund C.
Longatto Filho, Adhemar
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fregnani, José Humberto
Neto, Cristovam Scapulatempo
Haikel Junior, Raphael L.
Saccheto, T.
Campacci, N.
Mauad, Edmund C.
Longatto Filho, Adhemar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cytology
Papanicolaou test
SurePath
Cytological screening
Liquid-based cytology
Science & Technology
topic Cytology
Papanicolaou test
SurePath
Cytological screening
Liquid-based cytology
Science & Technology
description Objective: It was the aim of this study to compare diagnostic performances of the BD SurePath (TM) liquid-based Papanicolaou test (LBC) and the conventional Papanicolaou test (CPT) in cervical samples of women from remote rural areas of Brazil. Study Design: Specimens were collected by mobile units provided by Barretos Cancer Hospital. This report evaluates the manual screening arm of the RODEO study. Of 12,048 women seen between May and December 2010, 6,001 were examined using LBC and 6,047 using CPT. Results: Comparative (LBC vs. CPT) outcomes were: all abnormal tests, 2.1 versus 1.0%; ASC-US (atypical squannous cells of unknown significance), 0.7 versus 0.1%; ASC-H (atypical squamous cells with possible high-grade squannous intraepithelial lesions) and AGC (atypical glandular cells), 0.4 versus 0.3%; LSIL (low-grade squannous intraepithelial lesions), 0.7 versus 0.3%; HSIL (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions), 0.4 versus 0.2%, and unsatisfactory, 0.03 versus 0.08%. The LBC arm detected significantly more lesions (ASC-US+) than CPT (p < 0.001); however, when we divided the diagnoses into two groups, ASC-H (negative/ASC-US/LSIL) and ASC-H+ (ASC-H/AGC/HSIL), the difference was not statistically important (p = 0.213). Conclusions: With inherent difficulties in patient recruitment and patient compliance with cancer screening, best test performance including human papillomavirus test capability are vitally necessary in Brazil's struggle to reduce cervical cancer.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/25113
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/25113
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0001-5547
10.1159/000343046
23221353
http://www.acta-cytol.com
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Karger AG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Karger AG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133068385058816