Valence Secession? Voting Shocks and Independence Support in Scotland
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4571 |
Resumo: | National identifications, cues from political actors, and cost-benefit calculations have been pointed as the main determinants of secession preferences. However, a recent surge in independence support in Scotland suggests that abrupt political changes may also affect these preferences: Brexit and the differentiated management of the Covid-19 pandemic by the UK and the Scottish governments are named as causes of the first independence sustained majority registered by polling in Scotland. In this article, I discuss how voting shocks may affect the levels of support for independence, revise the evidence that sustains these claims, and analyse how they have changed the profile of the pro-independence voter. The effect of these questions has substantial implications for a possible second independence referendum in Scotland, as well as for the broader debate on the sources of secession support. |
id |
RCAP_93842fcc61eff62423d0b244cc006a8c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4571 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Valence Secession? Voting Shocks and Independence Support in ScotlandBrexit; Covid-19; pandemic; independence referendums; ScotlandNational identifications, cues from political actors, and cost-benefit calculations have been pointed as the main determinants of secession preferences. However, a recent surge in independence support in Scotland suggests that abrupt political changes may also affect these preferences: Brexit and the differentiated management of the Covid-19 pandemic by the UK and the Scottish governments are named as causes of the first independence sustained majority registered by polling in Scotland. In this article, I discuss how voting shocks may affect the levels of support for independence, revise the evidence that sustains these claims, and analyse how they have changed the profile of the pro-independence voter. The effect of these questions has substantial implications for a possible second independence referendum in Scotland, as well as for the broader debate on the sources of secession support.Cogitatio2021-12-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4571oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4571Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Secessionism in Liberal Democracies: What Do We Really Know About the Explanations of Secessionism?; 399-4112183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4571https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4571https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4571/4571Copyright (c) 2021 Robert Liñeirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLiñeira, Robert2022-10-21T16:03:56Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4571Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:13:48.686319Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Valence Secession? Voting Shocks and Independence Support in Scotland |
title |
Valence Secession? Voting Shocks and Independence Support in Scotland |
spellingShingle |
Valence Secession? Voting Shocks and Independence Support in Scotland Liñeira, Robert Brexit; Covid-19; pandemic; independence referendums; Scotland |
title_short |
Valence Secession? Voting Shocks and Independence Support in Scotland |
title_full |
Valence Secession? Voting Shocks and Independence Support in Scotland |
title_fullStr |
Valence Secession? Voting Shocks and Independence Support in Scotland |
title_full_unstemmed |
Valence Secession? Voting Shocks and Independence Support in Scotland |
title_sort |
Valence Secession? Voting Shocks and Independence Support in Scotland |
author |
Liñeira, Robert |
author_facet |
Liñeira, Robert |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Liñeira, Robert |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brexit; Covid-19; pandemic; independence referendums; Scotland |
topic |
Brexit; Covid-19; pandemic; independence referendums; Scotland |
description |
National identifications, cues from political actors, and cost-benefit calculations have been pointed as the main determinants of secession preferences. However, a recent surge in independence support in Scotland suggests that abrupt political changes may also affect these preferences: Brexit and the differentiated management of the Covid-19 pandemic by the UK and the Scottish governments are named as causes of the first independence sustained majority registered by polling in Scotland. In this article, I discuss how voting shocks may affect the levels of support for independence, revise the evidence that sustains these claims, and analyse how they have changed the profile of the pro-independence voter. The effect of these questions has substantial implications for a possible second independence referendum in Scotland, as well as for the broader debate on the sources of secession support. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-10 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4571 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4571 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4571 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4571 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4571 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4571 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4571/4571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Robert Liñeira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Robert Liñeira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Secessionism in Liberal Democracies: What Do We Really Know About the Explanations of Secessionism?; 399-411 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130591302516736 |