Mapping and explaining the use of the left-right divide

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Freire, A.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Kivistik, K.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://www.bpsr.org.br/index.php/bpsr/article/view/178
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/14301
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7477
Resumo: This study is about mapping and explaining the use of the Left-Right divide across 14 countries from 5 Continents and relies on the richness of the post electoral mass surveys from the Comparative National Election Project: 14 countries and 18 elections spread over 5 continents. The paper shows not only how extensively the LR divide is used in these 14 countries, but also explains variation across both individuals and countries in terms of the factors determining LR recognition and use. Overall, it is shown that, although seen world-wide, the LR divide (both for self-placement and party placement) is more present in long consolidated and middle-aged democracies and countries with freer media systems than in new democracies and societies with less free media systems. In the case of parties LR placement, party size also counts: larger parties are more easily placed. Additionally, we also show that LR recognition is more socially and politically determined in long consolidated and middle-aged democracies and in countries with more freedom of the press than in new democracies and in systems with less free media system. These findings add to the existing knowledge about these topics because previous studies were either country/Continent specific, or, if global in nature, never invested in explaining individual and system variation across 14 from 5 Continents. Besides, these findings mean that in the long term probably the new democracies will converge with the long consolidated or middle-aged ones, but this is an empirical question to be researched in future studies.
id RCAP_93aa63862ced82260a1371cec22ab3a9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/7477
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Mapping and explaining the use of the left-right divideLeft-rightAmericaEuropeÁfricaÁsiaThis study is about mapping and explaining the use of the Left-Right divide across 14 countries from 5 Continents and relies on the richness of the post electoral mass surveys from the Comparative National Election Project: 14 countries and 18 elections spread over 5 continents. The paper shows not only how extensively the LR divide is used in these 14 countries, but also explains variation across both individuals and countries in terms of the factors determining LR recognition and use. Overall, it is shown that, although seen world-wide, the LR divide (both for self-placement and party placement) is more present in long consolidated and middle-aged democracies and countries with freer media systems than in new democracies and societies with less free media systems. In the case of parties LR placement, party size also counts: larger parties are more easily placed. Additionally, we also show that LR recognition is more socially and politically determined in long consolidated and middle-aged democracies and in countries with more freedom of the press than in new democracies and in systems with less free media system. These findings add to the existing knowledge about these topics because previous studies were either country/Continent specific, or, if global in nature, never invested in explaining individual and system variation across 14 from 5 Continents. Besides, these findings mean that in the long term probably the new democracies will converge with the long consolidated or middle-aged ones, but this is an empirical question to be researched in future studies.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2014-06-06T13:41:11Z2013-01-01T00:00:00Z20132014-05-22T10:47:55Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://www.bpsr.org.br/index.php/bpsr/article/view/178https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/14301http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7477eng1981-3821Freire, A.Kivistik, K.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:54:13Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/7477Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:27:16.740341Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mapping and explaining the use of the left-right divide
title Mapping and explaining the use of the left-right divide
spellingShingle Mapping and explaining the use of the left-right divide
Freire, A.
Left-right
America
Europe
África
Ásia
title_short Mapping and explaining the use of the left-right divide
title_full Mapping and explaining the use of the left-right divide
title_fullStr Mapping and explaining the use of the left-right divide
title_full_unstemmed Mapping and explaining the use of the left-right divide
title_sort Mapping and explaining the use of the left-right divide
author Freire, A.
author_facet Freire, A.
Kivistik, K.
author_role author
author2 Kivistik, K.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freire, A.
Kivistik, K.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Left-right
America
Europe
África
Ásia
topic Left-right
America
Europe
África
Ásia
description This study is about mapping and explaining the use of the Left-Right divide across 14 countries from 5 Continents and relies on the richness of the post electoral mass surveys from the Comparative National Election Project: 14 countries and 18 elections spread over 5 continents. The paper shows not only how extensively the LR divide is used in these 14 countries, but also explains variation across both individuals and countries in terms of the factors determining LR recognition and use. Overall, it is shown that, although seen world-wide, the LR divide (both for self-placement and party placement) is more present in long consolidated and middle-aged democracies and countries with freer media systems than in new democracies and societies with less free media systems. In the case of parties LR placement, party size also counts: larger parties are more easily placed. Additionally, we also show that LR recognition is more socially and politically determined in long consolidated and middle-aged democracies and in countries with more freedom of the press than in new democracies and in systems with less free media system. These findings add to the existing knowledge about these topics because previous studies were either country/Continent specific, or, if global in nature, never invested in explaining individual and system variation across 14 from 5 Continents. Besides, these findings mean that in the long term probably the new democracies will converge with the long consolidated or middle-aged ones, but this is an empirical question to be researched in future studies.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
2013
2014-06-06T13:41:11Z
2014-05-22T10:47:55Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.bpsr.org.br/index.php/bpsr/article/view/178
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/14301
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7477
url http://www.bpsr.org.br/index.php/bpsr/article/view/178
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/14301
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7477
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1981-3821
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134836041973760