Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cadilhe, José Pedro
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
DOI: 10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51
Resumo: Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage for Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage for
id RCAP_943cab8476e12b9c20b4a2ded97221f3
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/51
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo RandomizadoTransrectal Prostate Biopsy After Prophylatic Preparation of the Rectum with Povidone-Iodine: A Prospective Randomized TrialAntibiotic ProphylaxisBiopsyEndoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine Needle AspirationIodo-PovidonaPovidone- IodineProstateAspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom EndoscópicoBiópsiaProfilaxia AntibióticaPróstataIntroduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage for Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage forIntrodução: A biópsia prostática transrectal (BPTR) ecoguiada, de acordo com a literatura actual, pode causar infecções do trato urinário em até 11% e sepsis em até 2% dos pacientes. Avaliamos a capacidade de uma forma original de preparação retal com iodo-povidona peri-procedimento (BPTR ecoguiada) poder reduzir complicações infecciosas. Material e Métodos: Entre janeiro de 2014 e setembro de 2016, num estudo prospetivo e randomizado realizado num consultório privado, 94 homens foram divididos em dois grupos, antes da BPTR ecoguiada: • Com preparação rectal (uma original massagem prostática transrectal por cerca de meio minuto com 2,5 mL de betadina dérmica 100 mg/mL) (n=47) • Sem preparação (n=47). Todos os doentes receberam antibiótico profiláctico: levofloxacina 500 mg PO durante sete dias, iniciado no dia anterior ao procedimento. Os pacientes completaram uma entrevista por telefone quatro dias após a realização da biópsia e foram ao consultório médico duas semanas após a biópsia. O objectivo primário foi a comparação da taxa de complicações infecciosas Foi considerada complicação infecciosa a ocorrência de um ou mais dos seguintes eventos: 1) febre superior a 38,0ºC, 2) infecção do trato urinário ou 3) sépsis (definição padronizada). Foi utilizado o teste t de Student e a análise de regressão multivariada no estudo dos dados. Resultados: No grupo sem preparação rectal, seis pacientes (12,7%) tiveram complicações infecciosas: cinco apresentaram febre sem sépsis (11%) e um evoluiu com sépsis (2%). No grupo da preparação rectal com iodo-povidona solução dérmica não se registaram complicações infecciosas (0,0%). A análise multivariada não identificou nenhum subgrupo de pacientes com risco significativamente maior de infecção após a biópsia da próstata. Dos 94 homens que foram submetidos a BPTR ecoguiada, 45 (47,9%) foram diagnosticados com cancro da próstata e 3 (3,2%) apresentaram ASAP no resultado. A taxa de admissão hospitalar por complicações urológicas no prazo de 30 dias do procedimento foi de 1%, e apenas por razões relacionadas com infecção (sépsis). Conclusão: A administração de antibióticos profiláticos à base de quinolonas e a simples aplicação de 2,5 mL de solução de iodo-povidona através de uma massagem transrectal da próstata por cerca de meio minuto proporcionaram um excelente protocolo para reduzir as complicações infecciosas da BPTR ecoguiada.Associação Portuguesa de Urologia2018-07-24T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/51Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 35 No. 1-2 (2018): January-March; April-June; 28-31Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 35 n. 1-2 (2018): janeiro-março; abril-junho; 28-312387-04192341-4022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/51https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/51/33Copyright (c) 2018 Portuguese Association of Urologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCadilhe, José Pedro2022-09-21T09:04:46Zoai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/51Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:55:53.193279Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
Transrectal Prostate Biopsy After Prophylatic Preparation of the Rectum with Povidone-Iodine: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
spellingShingle Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
Cadilhe, José Pedro
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Biopsy
Endoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Iodo-Povidona
Povidone- Iodine
Prostate
Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico
Biópsia
Profilaxia Antibiótica
Próstata
Cadilhe, José Pedro
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Biopsy
Endoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Iodo-Povidona
Povidone- Iodine
Prostate
Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico
Biópsia
Profilaxia Antibiótica
Próstata
title_short Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
title_full Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
title_fullStr Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
title_full_unstemmed Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
title_sort Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
author Cadilhe, José Pedro
author_facet Cadilhe, José Pedro
Cadilhe, José Pedro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cadilhe, José Pedro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Biopsy
Endoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Iodo-Povidona
Povidone- Iodine
Prostate
Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico
Biópsia
Profilaxia Antibiótica
Próstata
topic Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Biopsy
Endoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Iodo-Povidona
Povidone- Iodine
Prostate
Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico
Biópsia
Profilaxia Antibiótica
Próstata
description Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage for Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage for
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-24T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51
oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/51
url https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51
identifier_str_mv oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/51
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/51
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51
http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/51/33
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Portuguese Association of Urology
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Portuguese Association of Urology
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 35 No. 1-2 (2018): January-March; April-June; 28-31
Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 35 n. 1-2 (2018): janeiro-março; abril-junho; 28-31
2387-0419
2341-4022
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822242158492516352
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51