Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
DOI: | 10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51 |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage for Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage for |
id |
RCAP_943cab8476e12b9c20b4a2ded97221f3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/51 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo RandomizadoTransrectal Prostate Biopsy After Prophylatic Preparation of the Rectum with Povidone-Iodine: A Prospective Randomized TrialAntibiotic ProphylaxisBiopsyEndoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine Needle AspirationIodo-PovidonaPovidone- IodineProstateAspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom EndoscópicoBiópsiaProfilaxia AntibióticaPróstataIntroduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage for Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage forIntrodução: A biópsia prostática transrectal (BPTR) ecoguiada, de acordo com a literatura actual, pode causar infecções do trato urinário em até 11% e sepsis em até 2% dos pacientes. Avaliamos a capacidade de uma forma original de preparação retal com iodo-povidona peri-procedimento (BPTR ecoguiada) poder reduzir complicações infecciosas. Material e Métodos: Entre janeiro de 2014 e setembro de 2016, num estudo prospetivo e randomizado realizado num consultório privado, 94 homens foram divididos em dois grupos, antes da BPTR ecoguiada: • Com preparação rectal (uma original massagem prostática transrectal por cerca de meio minuto com 2,5 mL de betadina dérmica 100 mg/mL) (n=47) • Sem preparação (n=47). Todos os doentes receberam antibiótico profiláctico: levofloxacina 500 mg PO durante sete dias, iniciado no dia anterior ao procedimento. Os pacientes completaram uma entrevista por telefone quatro dias após a realização da biópsia e foram ao consultório médico duas semanas após a biópsia. O objectivo primário foi a comparação da taxa de complicações infecciosas Foi considerada complicação infecciosa a ocorrência de um ou mais dos seguintes eventos: 1) febre superior a 38,0ºC, 2) infecção do trato urinário ou 3) sépsis (definição padronizada). Foi utilizado o teste t de Student e a análise de regressão multivariada no estudo dos dados. Resultados: No grupo sem preparação rectal, seis pacientes (12,7%) tiveram complicações infecciosas: cinco apresentaram febre sem sépsis (11%) e um evoluiu com sépsis (2%). No grupo da preparação rectal com iodo-povidona solução dérmica não se registaram complicações infecciosas (0,0%). A análise multivariada não identificou nenhum subgrupo de pacientes com risco significativamente maior de infecção após a biópsia da próstata. Dos 94 homens que foram submetidos a BPTR ecoguiada, 45 (47,9%) foram diagnosticados com cancro da próstata e 3 (3,2%) apresentaram ASAP no resultado. A taxa de admissão hospitalar por complicações urológicas no prazo de 30 dias do procedimento foi de 1%, e apenas por razões relacionadas com infecção (sépsis). Conclusão: A administração de antibióticos profiláticos à base de quinolonas e a simples aplicação de 2,5 mL de solução de iodo-povidona através de uma massagem transrectal da próstata por cerca de meio minuto proporcionaram um excelente protocolo para reduzir as complicações infecciosas da BPTR ecoguiada.Associação Portuguesa de Urologia2018-07-24T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/51Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 35 No. 1-2 (2018): January-March; April-June; 28-31Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 35 n. 1-2 (2018): janeiro-março; abril-junho; 28-312387-04192341-4022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/51https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/51/33Copyright (c) 2018 Portuguese Association of Urologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCadilhe, José Pedro2022-09-21T09:04:46Zoai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/51Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:55:53.193279Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado Transrectal Prostate Biopsy After Prophylatic Preparation of the Rectum with Povidone-Iodine: A Prospective Randomized Trial |
title |
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado |
spellingShingle |
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado Cadilhe, José Pedro Antibiotic Prophylaxis Biopsy Endoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Iodo-Povidona Povidone- Iodine Prostate Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico Biópsia Profilaxia Antibiótica Próstata Cadilhe, José Pedro Antibiotic Prophylaxis Biopsy Endoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Iodo-Povidona Povidone- Iodine Prostate Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico Biópsia Profilaxia Antibiótica Próstata |
title_short |
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado |
title_full |
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado |
title_fullStr |
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado |
title_sort |
Biópsia Prostática Transretal Após Preparação Profilática do Recto com Iodo-Povidona: Estudo Prospectivo Randomizado |
author |
Cadilhe, José Pedro |
author_facet |
Cadilhe, José Pedro Cadilhe, José Pedro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cadilhe, José Pedro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antibiotic Prophylaxis Biopsy Endoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Iodo-Povidona Povidone- Iodine Prostate Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico Biópsia Profilaxia Antibiótica Próstata |
topic |
Antibiotic Prophylaxis Biopsy Endoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Iodo-Povidona Povidone- Iodine Prostate Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico Biópsia Profilaxia Antibiótica Próstata |
description |
Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage for Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx), according to the literature, can lead to urinary tract infections in up to 11% and sepsis in up to 2% of patients. We evaluate whether an original way to apply povidone-iodine rectal preparation just prior to TRUS-Bx can reduce infectious complications. Material and Methods: Between January 2014 and September 2016, 94 men in private office were prospectively randomized to two groups, before TRUS-Bx: • Rectal cleansing (an original transrectal “prostate massage” for about half a minute with 2.5 mL of betadine dermic solution 100 mg/mL) (n=47) or • No cleansing (n=47). All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics: levofloxacin 500 mg PO for 7 days, beginning the day before procedure. Patients completed a telephone interview 4 days after undergoing the biopsy and went to the office 2 weeks after biopsy. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications. An infectious complication when one or more of the following events occurred: 1) fever greater than 38.0Cº, 2) urinary tract infection or 3) sepsis (standardized definition). Student t test and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Infectious complications developed in 6 cases (12.7%) in the non-rectal preparation group: five patients had fever without sepsis (11%) and one had sepsis (2%). In the povidone-iodine rectal preparation group there were no infectious complications (0.0%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at significantly higher risk of infection after prostate biopsy. Of the 94 men who underwent TRUS-Bx 45 (47.9%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3 (3.2%) had ASAP in the result. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure was 1%, and only for infection related reasons (sepsis). Conclusion: The administration of quinolone-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of 2.5 mL of povidone-iodine dermic solution in a transrectal prostate massage for |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-24T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51 oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/51 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/51 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/51 https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51 http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/51/33 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Portuguese Association of Urology info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Portuguese Association of Urology |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 35 No. 1-2 (2018): January-March; April-June; 28-31 Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 35 n. 1-2 (2018): janeiro-março; abril-junho; 28-31 2387-0419 2341-4022 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822242158492516352 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.24915/aup.35.1-2.51 |