Why cultural landscapes have different values? Thinking about heritage landscape evaluation and monitoring tools
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3764 |
Resumo: | The subject of this paper aims to contribute for the management of heritage landscapes. Among others, this approach it’s quite important when we intend to establish a priority scale concerning indicators monitoring criteria. The authors want to emphasized and remember the fact that many cultural landscapes present a high heritage value; if everybody agree upon that, they must be submitted to heritage science criteria and good practices goals. It means we care about preservation and conservation policies and evaluation methods. So, this approach obliged us also to perceive the link between the actual cultural landscape and the people history that interact with this specific area. We can put it in an interrogative way: is it possible to reach all cultural landscape values if we don’t know how people have built up each landscape for centuries? Nevertheless, our objective now is just to identify some criteria or parameters that we should take care and account when we are defining the heritage landscape values. This is quite important when we try to intervene in land management to valorise countryside and give a change to rural development. |
id |
RCAP_9472410db5d2aac897d96b16cefa01d5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/3764 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Why cultural landscapes have different values? Thinking about heritage landscape evaluation and monitoring toolslandscapeheritageevaluation criteriamonitoring indicatorsThe subject of this paper aims to contribute for the management of heritage landscapes. Among others, this approach it’s quite important when we intend to establish a priority scale concerning indicators monitoring criteria. The authors want to emphasized and remember the fact that many cultural landscapes present a high heritage value; if everybody agree upon that, they must be submitted to heritage science criteria and good practices goals. It means we care about preservation and conservation policies and evaluation methods. So, this approach obliged us also to perceive the link between the actual cultural landscape and the people history that interact with this specific area. We can put it in an interrogative way: is it possible to reach all cultural landscape values if we don’t know how people have built up each landscape for centuries? Nevertheless, our objective now is just to identify some criteria or parameters that we should take care and account when we are defining the heritage landscape values. This is quite important when we try to intervene in land management to valorise countryside and give a change to rural development.Czech society for Landscape Ecology (CZ - IALE)2012-01-18T12:46:49Z2012-01-182011-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/3764http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3764eng1803-2427Journal of Landscape Ecology - Prague, Czech Republicscapelo@uevora.ptndjmm@uevora.pt597Capelo, SofiaBarata, Filipe ThemudoMascarenhas, José Manuelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T18:41:14Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/3764Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:59:11.431848Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Why cultural landscapes have different values? Thinking about heritage landscape evaluation and monitoring tools |
title |
Why cultural landscapes have different values? Thinking about heritage landscape evaluation and monitoring tools |
spellingShingle |
Why cultural landscapes have different values? Thinking about heritage landscape evaluation and monitoring tools Capelo, Sofia landscape heritage evaluation criteria monitoring indicators |
title_short |
Why cultural landscapes have different values? Thinking about heritage landscape evaluation and monitoring tools |
title_full |
Why cultural landscapes have different values? Thinking about heritage landscape evaluation and monitoring tools |
title_fullStr |
Why cultural landscapes have different values? Thinking about heritage landscape evaluation and monitoring tools |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why cultural landscapes have different values? Thinking about heritage landscape evaluation and monitoring tools |
title_sort |
Why cultural landscapes have different values? Thinking about heritage landscape evaluation and monitoring tools |
author |
Capelo, Sofia |
author_facet |
Capelo, Sofia Barata, Filipe Themudo Mascarenhas, José Manuel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barata, Filipe Themudo Mascarenhas, José Manuel |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Capelo, Sofia Barata, Filipe Themudo Mascarenhas, José Manuel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
landscape heritage evaluation criteria monitoring indicators |
topic |
landscape heritage evaluation criteria monitoring indicators |
description |
The subject of this paper aims to contribute for the management of heritage landscapes. Among others, this approach it’s quite important when we intend to establish a priority scale concerning indicators monitoring criteria. The authors want to emphasized and remember the fact that many cultural landscapes present a high heritage value; if everybody agree upon that, they must be submitted to heritage science criteria and good practices goals. It means we care about preservation and conservation policies and evaluation methods. So, this approach obliged us also to perceive the link between the actual cultural landscape and the people history that interact with this specific area. We can put it in an interrogative way: is it possible to reach all cultural landscape values if we don’t know how people have built up each landscape for centuries? Nevertheless, our objective now is just to identify some criteria or parameters that we should take care and account when we are defining the heritage landscape values. This is quite important when we try to intervene in land management to valorise countryside and give a change to rural development. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z 2012-01-18T12:46:49Z 2012-01-18 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3764 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3764 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/3764 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1803-2427 Journal of Landscape Ecology - Prague, Czech Republic scapelo@uevora.pt nd jmm@uevora.pt 597 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Czech society for Landscape Ecology (CZ - IALE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Czech society for Landscape Ecology (CZ - IALE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136474490208256 |