Privacy and Surveillance Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the laws in the USA and India.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11144/5668 |
Resumo: | The Right to Privacy and the need for Surveillance has always remained a contentious issue between citizens and law enforcement agencies. This paper attempts to analyse the various laws relating to Surveillance in the largest and oldest democracies of the world, India and the United States of America. Regardless of vast variances in socio-economic and political realities, these two countries qualify as intriguing focuses for study. Though the Rig ht to Privacy is generally accepted as a fundamental right throughout the nations of the world, the primacy given to ‘National Security’ and simultaneously balancing it with individual liberties seems to be a recognised phenomenon in both these jurisdictions. |
id |
RCAP_94ca5ccec47b575270cdbd83d76304ed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ual.pt:11144/5668 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Privacy and Surveillance Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the laws in the USA and India.PrivacySurveillanceUnlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967National SecurityKharak Singh v. State of Uttar PradeshTelegraph ActTerrorism and PATRIOT Act.The Right to Privacy and the need for Surveillance has always remained a contentious issue between citizens and law enforcement agencies. This paper attempts to analyse the various laws relating to Surveillance in the largest and oldest democracies of the world, India and the United States of America. Regardless of vast variances in socio-economic and political realities, these two countries qualify as intriguing focuses for study. Though the Rig ht to Privacy is generally accepted as a fundamental right throughout the nations of the world, the primacy given to ‘National Security’ and simultaneously balancing it with individual liberties seems to be a recognised phenomenon in both these jurisdictions.OBERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa2022-11-14T12:48:47Z2022-11-01T00:00:00Z2022-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://hdl.handle.net/11144/5668eng1647-7251https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.13.2.8Chadha, VaibhavBalasubramanian, Thajaswini CoimbatoreBhuwalka, Anshulinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-11T02:15:38Zoai:repositorio.ual.pt:11144/5668Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:33:02.519049Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Privacy and Surveillance Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the laws in the USA and India. |
title |
Privacy and Surveillance Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the laws in the USA and India. |
spellingShingle |
Privacy and Surveillance Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the laws in the USA and India. Chadha, Vaibhav Privacy Surveillance Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 National Security Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh Telegraph Act Terrorism and PATRIOT Act. |
title_short |
Privacy and Surveillance Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the laws in the USA and India. |
title_full |
Privacy and Surveillance Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the laws in the USA and India. |
title_fullStr |
Privacy and Surveillance Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the laws in the USA and India. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Privacy and Surveillance Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the laws in the USA and India. |
title_sort |
Privacy and Surveillance Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the laws in the USA and India. |
author |
Chadha, Vaibhav |
author_facet |
Chadha, Vaibhav Balasubramanian, Thajaswini Coimbatore Bhuwalka, Anshul |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Balasubramanian, Thajaswini Coimbatore Bhuwalka, Anshul |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Chadha, Vaibhav Balasubramanian, Thajaswini Coimbatore Bhuwalka, Anshul |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Privacy Surveillance Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 National Security Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh Telegraph Act Terrorism and PATRIOT Act. |
topic |
Privacy Surveillance Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 National Security Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh Telegraph Act Terrorism and PATRIOT Act. |
description |
The Right to Privacy and the need for Surveillance has always remained a contentious issue between citizens and law enforcement agencies. This paper attempts to analyse the various laws relating to Surveillance in the largest and oldest democracies of the world, India and the United States of America. Regardless of vast variances in socio-economic and political realities, these two countries qualify as intriguing focuses for study. Though the Rig ht to Privacy is generally accepted as a fundamental right throughout the nations of the world, the primacy given to ‘National Security’ and simultaneously balancing it with individual liberties seems to be a recognised phenomenon in both these jurisdictions. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-14T12:48:47Z 2022-11-01T00:00:00Z 2022-11 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11144/5668 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11144/5668 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1647-7251 https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.13.2.8 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
OBERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
OBERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136809568960512 |