Can Core Flows inferred from Geomagnetic Field Models explain the Earth's Dynamo?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schaeffer, Nathanaël
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/80793
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv488
Resumo: We test the ability of large scale velocity fields inferred from geomagnetic secular variation data to produce the global magnetic field of the Earth.Our kinematic dynamo calculations use quasi-geostrophic (QG) flows inverted from geomagnetic field models which, as such, incorporate flow structures that are Earth-like and may be important for the geodynamo.Furthermore, the QG hypothesis allows straightforward prolongation of the flow from the core surface to the bulk.As expected from previous studies, we check that a simple quasi-geostrophic flow is not able to sustain the magnetic field against ohmic decay.Additional complexity is then introduced in the flow, inspired by the action of the Lorentz force.Indeed, on centenial time-scales, the Lorentz force can balance the Coriolis force and strict quasi-geostrophy may not be the best ansatz.When the columnar flow is modified to account for the action of the Lorentz force, magnetic field is generated for Elsasser numbers larger than 0.25 and magnetic Reynolds numbers larger than 100.This suggests that our large scale flow captures the relevant features for the generation of the Earth's magnetic field and that the invisible small scale flow may not be directly involved in this process.Near the threshold, the resulting magnetic field is dominated by an axial dipole, with some reversed flux patches.Time-dependence is also considered, derived from principal component analysis applied to the inverted flows.We find that time periods from 120 to 50 years do not affect the mean growth rate of the kinematic dynamos.Finally we notice the footprint of the inner-core in the magnetic field generated deep in the bulk of the shell, although we did not include one in our computations.
id RCAP_96969b5597f9ea47cfca5724d8d34d8b
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/80793
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Can Core Flows inferred from Geomagnetic Field Models explain the Earth's Dynamo?Physics - GeophysicsPhysics - GeophysicsWe test the ability of large scale velocity fields inferred from geomagnetic secular variation data to produce the global magnetic field of the Earth.Our kinematic dynamo calculations use quasi-geostrophic (QG) flows inverted from geomagnetic field models which, as such, incorporate flow structures that are Earth-like and may be important for the geodynamo.Furthermore, the QG hypothesis allows straightforward prolongation of the flow from the core surface to the bulk.As expected from previous studies, we check that a simple quasi-geostrophic flow is not able to sustain the magnetic field against ohmic decay.Additional complexity is then introduced in the flow, inspired by the action of the Lorentz force.Indeed, on centenial time-scales, the Lorentz force can balance the Coriolis force and strict quasi-geostrophy may not be the best ansatz.When the columnar flow is modified to account for the action of the Lorentz force, magnetic field is generated for Elsasser numbers larger than 0.25 and magnetic Reynolds numbers larger than 100.This suggests that our large scale flow captures the relevant features for the generation of the Earth's magnetic field and that the invisible small scale flow may not be directly involved in this process.Near the threshold, the resulting magnetic field is dominated by an axial dipole, with some reversed flux patches.Time-dependence is also considered, derived from principal component analysis applied to the inverted flows.We find that time periods from 120 to 50 years do not affect the mean growth rate of the kinematic dynamos.Finally we notice the footprint of the inner-core in the magnetic field generated deep in the bulk of the shell, although we did not include one in our computations.2015-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/80793http://hdl.handle.net/10316/80793https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv488porhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02403v3Schaeffer, Nathanaëlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-01-25T11:48:49Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/80793Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:03:05.230534Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can Core Flows inferred from Geomagnetic Field Models explain the Earth's Dynamo?
title Can Core Flows inferred from Geomagnetic Field Models explain the Earth's Dynamo?
spellingShingle Can Core Flows inferred from Geomagnetic Field Models explain the Earth's Dynamo?
Schaeffer, Nathanaël
Physics - Geophysics
Physics - Geophysics
title_short Can Core Flows inferred from Geomagnetic Field Models explain the Earth's Dynamo?
title_full Can Core Flows inferred from Geomagnetic Field Models explain the Earth's Dynamo?
title_fullStr Can Core Flows inferred from Geomagnetic Field Models explain the Earth's Dynamo?
title_full_unstemmed Can Core Flows inferred from Geomagnetic Field Models explain the Earth's Dynamo?
title_sort Can Core Flows inferred from Geomagnetic Field Models explain the Earth's Dynamo?
author Schaeffer, Nathanaël
author_facet Schaeffer, Nathanaël
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schaeffer, Nathanaël
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Physics - Geophysics
Physics - Geophysics
topic Physics - Geophysics
Physics - Geophysics
description We test the ability of large scale velocity fields inferred from geomagnetic secular variation data to produce the global magnetic field of the Earth.Our kinematic dynamo calculations use quasi-geostrophic (QG) flows inverted from geomagnetic field models which, as such, incorporate flow structures that are Earth-like and may be important for the geodynamo.Furthermore, the QG hypothesis allows straightforward prolongation of the flow from the core surface to the bulk.As expected from previous studies, we check that a simple quasi-geostrophic flow is not able to sustain the magnetic field against ohmic decay.Additional complexity is then introduced in the flow, inspired by the action of the Lorentz force.Indeed, on centenial time-scales, the Lorentz force can balance the Coriolis force and strict quasi-geostrophy may not be the best ansatz.When the columnar flow is modified to account for the action of the Lorentz force, magnetic field is generated for Elsasser numbers larger than 0.25 and magnetic Reynolds numbers larger than 100.This suggests that our large scale flow captures the relevant features for the generation of the Earth's magnetic field and that the invisible small scale flow may not be directly involved in this process.Near the threshold, the resulting magnetic field is dominated by an axial dipole, with some reversed flux patches.Time-dependence is also considered, derived from principal component analysis applied to the inverted flows.We find that time periods from 120 to 50 years do not affect the mean growth rate of the kinematic dynamos.Finally we notice the footprint of the inner-core in the magnetic field generated deep in the bulk of the shell, although we did not include one in our computations.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/80793
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/80793
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv488
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/80793
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv488
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02403v3
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1817553353692938240