Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Gabriela
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Bravo, Jorge, Folgado, Hugo, Rosado, Hugo, Mendes, Felismina, Pereira, Catarina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710
https://doi.org/Almeida G, Bravo J, Folgado H, Rosado H, Mendes F, Pereira C (2019) Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. PLoS ONE 14 (11): e0225118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0225118
https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225118
Resumo: Thus far, few studies have examined the estimation and actual performance of locomotor ability in older adults. To our knowledge, there are no studies examining the relationship between stepping-forward estimation versus ability and fall occurrence. The aim of this study was to develop and assess the reliability and validity of a new test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. In total, 347 participants (73.1 ± 6.2 years; 266 women) were assessed for their perception of maximum distance for the stepping-forward and action boundary. The test was developed following the existing literature and expert opinions. The task showed strong internal consistency. Intraclass correlation ranged from 0.99 to 1 for intrarater agreement and from 0.83 to 0.97 for interrater agreement. Multivariate binary regression analysis models revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.665 (95% CI: 0.608–0.723) for fallers and 0.728 (95% CI: 0.655–0.797) for recurrent fallers. The stepping-forward affordance perception test (SF-APT) was demonstrated to be accurate, reliable and valid for fall risk assessment. The results showed that a large estimated stepping-forward associated with an underestimated absolute error works as a protective mechanism for fallers and recurrent fallers in community-dwelling older adults. SF-APT is safe, quick, easy to administer, well accepted and reproducible for application in community or clinical settings by either clinical or nonclinical care professionals.
id RCAP_96a9f6b8aa02840aa02dfcb24d10edd4
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/26710
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adultsAgingFalling;action boundaryValidationjudgment biasThus far, few studies have examined the estimation and actual performance of locomotor ability in older adults. To our knowledge, there are no studies examining the relationship between stepping-forward estimation versus ability and fall occurrence. The aim of this study was to develop and assess the reliability and validity of a new test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. In total, 347 participants (73.1 ± 6.2 years; 266 women) were assessed for their perception of maximum distance for the stepping-forward and action boundary. The test was developed following the existing literature and expert opinions. The task showed strong internal consistency. Intraclass correlation ranged from 0.99 to 1 for intrarater agreement and from 0.83 to 0.97 for interrater agreement. Multivariate binary regression analysis models revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.665 (95% CI: 0.608–0.723) for fallers and 0.728 (95% CI: 0.655–0.797) for recurrent fallers. The stepping-forward affordance perception test (SF-APT) was demonstrated to be accurate, reliable and valid for fall risk assessment. The results showed that a large estimated stepping-forward associated with an underestimated absolute error works as a protective mechanism for fallers and recurrent fallers in community-dwelling older adults. SF-APT is safe, quick, easy to administer, well accepted and reproducible for application in community or clinical settings by either clinical or nonclinical care professionals.2020-02-03T09:13:50Z2020-02-032019-11-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710https://doi.org/Almeida G, Bravo J, Folgado H, Rosado H, Mendes F, Pereira C (2019) Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. PLoS ONE 14 (11): e0225118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0225118http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225118porgsna@uevora.ptjorgebravo@uevora.pthfolgado@uevora.pthrosado@uevora.ptfm@uevora.ptclnp@uevora.ptAlmeida, GabrielaBravo, JorgeFolgado, HugoRosado, HugoMendes, FelisminaPereira, Catarinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:20:29Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/26710Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:16:24.672243Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults
title Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults
spellingShingle Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults
Almeida, Gabriela
Aging
Falling;
action boundary
Validation
judgment bias
title_short Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults
title_full Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults
title_fullStr Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults
title_sort Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults
author Almeida, Gabriela
author_facet Almeida, Gabriela
Bravo, Jorge
Folgado, Hugo
Rosado, Hugo
Mendes, Felismina
Pereira, Catarina
author_role author
author2 Bravo, Jorge
Folgado, Hugo
Rosado, Hugo
Mendes, Felismina
Pereira, Catarina
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Gabriela
Bravo, Jorge
Folgado, Hugo
Rosado, Hugo
Mendes, Felismina
Pereira, Catarina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aging
Falling;
action boundary
Validation
judgment bias
topic Aging
Falling;
action boundary
Validation
judgment bias
description Thus far, few studies have examined the estimation and actual performance of locomotor ability in older adults. To our knowledge, there are no studies examining the relationship between stepping-forward estimation versus ability and fall occurrence. The aim of this study was to develop and assess the reliability and validity of a new test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. In total, 347 participants (73.1 ± 6.2 years; 266 women) were assessed for their perception of maximum distance for the stepping-forward and action boundary. The test was developed following the existing literature and expert opinions. The task showed strong internal consistency. Intraclass correlation ranged from 0.99 to 1 for intrarater agreement and from 0.83 to 0.97 for interrater agreement. Multivariate binary regression analysis models revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.665 (95% CI: 0.608–0.723) for fallers and 0.728 (95% CI: 0.655–0.797) for recurrent fallers. The stepping-forward affordance perception test (SF-APT) was demonstrated to be accurate, reliable and valid for fall risk assessment. The results showed that a large estimated stepping-forward associated with an underestimated absolute error works as a protective mechanism for fallers and recurrent fallers in community-dwelling older adults. SF-APT is safe, quick, easy to administer, well accepted and reproducible for application in community or clinical settings by either clinical or nonclinical care professionals.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-01T00:00:00Z
2020-02-03T09:13:50Z
2020-02-03
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710
https://doi.org/Almeida G, Bravo J, Folgado H, Rosado H, Mendes F, Pereira C (2019) Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. PLoS ONE 14 (11): e0225118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0225118
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710
https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225118
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710
https://doi.org/Almeida G, Bravo J, Folgado H, Rosado H, Mendes F, Pereira C (2019) Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. PLoS ONE 14 (11): e0225118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0225118
https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225118
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv gsna@uevora.pt
jorgebravo@uevora.pt
hfolgado@uevora.pt
hrosado@uevora.pt
fm@uevora.pt
clnp@uevora.pt
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136646200819712