Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710 https://doi.org/Almeida G, Bravo J, Folgado H, Rosado H, Mendes F, Pereira C (2019) Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. PLoS ONE 14 (11): e0225118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0225118 https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225118 |
Resumo: | Thus far, few studies have examined the estimation and actual performance of locomotor ability in older adults. To our knowledge, there are no studies examining the relationship between stepping-forward estimation versus ability and fall occurrence. The aim of this study was to develop and assess the reliability and validity of a new test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. In total, 347 participants (73.1 ± 6.2 years; 266 women) were assessed for their perception of maximum distance for the stepping-forward and action boundary. The test was developed following the existing literature and expert opinions. The task showed strong internal consistency. Intraclass correlation ranged from 0.99 to 1 for intrarater agreement and from 0.83 to 0.97 for interrater agreement. Multivariate binary regression analysis models revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.665 (95% CI: 0.608–0.723) for fallers and 0.728 (95% CI: 0.655–0.797) for recurrent fallers. The stepping-forward affordance perception test (SF-APT) was demonstrated to be accurate, reliable and valid for fall risk assessment. The results showed that a large estimated stepping-forward associated with an underestimated absolute error works as a protective mechanism for fallers and recurrent fallers in community-dwelling older adults. SF-APT is safe, quick, easy to administer, well accepted and reproducible for application in community or clinical settings by either clinical or nonclinical care professionals. |
id |
RCAP_96a9f6b8aa02840aa02dfcb24d10edd4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/26710 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adultsAgingFalling;action boundaryValidationjudgment biasThus far, few studies have examined the estimation and actual performance of locomotor ability in older adults. To our knowledge, there are no studies examining the relationship between stepping-forward estimation versus ability and fall occurrence. The aim of this study was to develop and assess the reliability and validity of a new test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. In total, 347 participants (73.1 ± 6.2 years; 266 women) were assessed for their perception of maximum distance for the stepping-forward and action boundary. The test was developed following the existing literature and expert opinions. The task showed strong internal consistency. Intraclass correlation ranged from 0.99 to 1 for intrarater agreement and from 0.83 to 0.97 for interrater agreement. Multivariate binary regression analysis models revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.665 (95% CI: 0.608–0.723) for fallers and 0.728 (95% CI: 0.655–0.797) for recurrent fallers. The stepping-forward affordance perception test (SF-APT) was demonstrated to be accurate, reliable and valid for fall risk assessment. The results showed that a large estimated stepping-forward associated with an underestimated absolute error works as a protective mechanism for fallers and recurrent fallers in community-dwelling older adults. SF-APT is safe, quick, easy to administer, well accepted and reproducible for application in community or clinical settings by either clinical or nonclinical care professionals.2020-02-03T09:13:50Z2020-02-032019-11-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710https://doi.org/Almeida G, Bravo J, Folgado H, Rosado H, Mendes F, Pereira C (2019) Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. PLoS ONE 14 (11): e0225118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0225118http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225118porgsna@uevora.ptjorgebravo@uevora.pthfolgado@uevora.pthrosado@uevora.ptfm@uevora.ptclnp@uevora.ptAlmeida, GabrielaBravo, JorgeFolgado, HugoRosado, HugoMendes, FelisminaPereira, Catarinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:20:29Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/26710Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:16:24.672243Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults |
title |
Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults |
spellingShingle |
Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults Almeida, Gabriela Aging Falling; action boundary Validation judgment bias |
title_short |
Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults |
title_full |
Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults |
title_fullStr |
Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults |
title_sort |
Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults |
author |
Almeida, Gabriela |
author_facet |
Almeida, Gabriela Bravo, Jorge Folgado, Hugo Rosado, Hugo Mendes, Felismina Pereira, Catarina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bravo, Jorge Folgado, Hugo Rosado, Hugo Mendes, Felismina Pereira, Catarina |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, Gabriela Bravo, Jorge Folgado, Hugo Rosado, Hugo Mendes, Felismina Pereira, Catarina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aging Falling; action boundary Validation judgment bias |
topic |
Aging Falling; action boundary Validation judgment bias |
description |
Thus far, few studies have examined the estimation and actual performance of locomotor ability in older adults. To our knowledge, there are no studies examining the relationship between stepping-forward estimation versus ability and fall occurrence. The aim of this study was to develop and assess the reliability and validity of a new test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. In total, 347 participants (73.1 ± 6.2 years; 266 women) were assessed for their perception of maximum distance for the stepping-forward and action boundary. The test was developed following the existing literature and expert opinions. The task showed strong internal consistency. Intraclass correlation ranged from 0.99 to 1 for intrarater agreement and from 0.83 to 0.97 for interrater agreement. Multivariate binary regression analysis models revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.665 (95% CI: 0.608–0.723) for fallers and 0.728 (95% CI: 0.655–0.797) for recurrent fallers. The stepping-forward affordance perception test (SF-APT) was demonstrated to be accurate, reliable and valid for fall risk assessment. The results showed that a large estimated stepping-forward associated with an underestimated absolute error works as a protective mechanism for fallers and recurrent fallers in community-dwelling older adults. SF-APT is safe, quick, easy to administer, well accepted and reproducible for application in community or clinical settings by either clinical or nonclinical care professionals. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-01T00:00:00Z 2020-02-03T09:13:50Z 2020-02-03 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710 https://doi.org/Almeida G, Bravo J, Folgado H, Rosado H, Mendes F, Pereira C (2019) Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. PLoS ONE 14 (11): e0225118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0225118 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710 https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225118 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/26710 https://doi.org/Almeida G, Bravo J, Folgado H, Rosado H, Mendes F, Pereira C (2019) Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults. PLoS ONE 14 (11): e0225118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0225118 https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225118 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
gsna@uevora.pt jorgebravo@uevora.pt hfolgado@uevora.pt hrosado@uevora.pt fm@uevora.pt clnp@uevora.pt |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136646200819712 |