Argumento(s) de projecto: possibilidade(s) de um atlas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Daniel Filipe Torres Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/116777
Resumo: This dissertation had its origin on the unrest that has been growing around the consciousness of the end of this cycle, of learning the architecture's operative tools, based on principles, methodologies of a particular school. And so, it assumes itself as a step back, a distance, a transition to the next moment - the confrontation to the real conditions of making architecture. In this student-architect condition, this document symbolizes/configurates the (possible) search on the (re)foundation of my own sense of project, of an autonomy. Without dogmas or paradigms, we try to identify the fundamentals or arguments of the creation of (our/a) project. In the set of sections here gathered we try to give notice to the movements, incurses or approaches that have been carried out, both on the projects-of-architecture of the masters as well on our own essay circumstances - to recognize an inherited body with a future purpose, at the fair distance. Admitting the arbitrariness of the architectural form, that provides from the liberty associated to its creation, and the unrest that this consciousness generates against the infinite panorama of possibilities of giving a form to the form, we seek for instruments, strategies, procedures, anchors or valid arguments to the project - we look for our own law in that freedom. Recognizing the complementary sense of every construction, we project in the task of drawing the space of "we", the reason of (our own) architecture. In order to be timely to architecture and to be a participant in the right tone, we attribute the project a procedural sense (as a resilience to the method idea) and explore the look, distance and limit as a way of building that adequacy problem; of building a posture, a certain way to look and intersect the world, of (re)concile what, at the start, wasn't (re)conciable.
id RCAP_96ee67187010d450768f3a5bdc102732
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/116777
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Argumento(s) de projecto: possibilidade(s) de um atlasArtesArtsThis dissertation had its origin on the unrest that has been growing around the consciousness of the end of this cycle, of learning the architecture's operative tools, based on principles, methodologies of a particular school. And so, it assumes itself as a step back, a distance, a transition to the next moment - the confrontation to the real conditions of making architecture. In this student-architect condition, this document symbolizes/configurates the (possible) search on the (re)foundation of my own sense of project, of an autonomy. Without dogmas or paradigms, we try to identify the fundamentals or arguments of the creation of (our/a) project. In the set of sections here gathered we try to give notice to the movements, incurses or approaches that have been carried out, both on the projects-of-architecture of the masters as well on our own essay circumstances - to recognize an inherited body with a future purpose, at the fair distance. Admitting the arbitrariness of the architectural form, that provides from the liberty associated to its creation, and the unrest that this consciousness generates against the infinite panorama of possibilities of giving a form to the form, we seek for instruments, strategies, procedures, anchors or valid arguments to the project - we look for our own law in that freedom. Recognizing the complementary sense of every construction, we project in the task of drawing the space of "we", the reason of (our own) architecture. In order to be timely to architecture and to be a participant in the right tone, we attribute the project a procedural sense (as a resilience to the method idea) and explore the look, distance and limit as a way of building that adequacy problem; of building a posture, a certain way to look and intersect the world, of (re)concile what, at the start, wasn't (re)conciable.2018-11-072018-11-07T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/116777TID:202376680porDaniel Filipe Torres Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T15:06:23Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/116777Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:15:44.728836Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Argumento(s) de projecto: possibilidade(s) de um atlas
title Argumento(s) de projecto: possibilidade(s) de um atlas
spellingShingle Argumento(s) de projecto: possibilidade(s) de um atlas
Daniel Filipe Torres Ferreira
Artes
Arts
title_short Argumento(s) de projecto: possibilidade(s) de um atlas
title_full Argumento(s) de projecto: possibilidade(s) de um atlas
title_fullStr Argumento(s) de projecto: possibilidade(s) de um atlas
title_full_unstemmed Argumento(s) de projecto: possibilidade(s) de um atlas
title_sort Argumento(s) de projecto: possibilidade(s) de um atlas
author Daniel Filipe Torres Ferreira
author_facet Daniel Filipe Torres Ferreira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Daniel Filipe Torres Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artes
Arts
topic Artes
Arts
description This dissertation had its origin on the unrest that has been growing around the consciousness of the end of this cycle, of learning the architecture's operative tools, based on principles, methodologies of a particular school. And so, it assumes itself as a step back, a distance, a transition to the next moment - the confrontation to the real conditions of making architecture. In this student-architect condition, this document symbolizes/configurates the (possible) search on the (re)foundation of my own sense of project, of an autonomy. Without dogmas or paradigms, we try to identify the fundamentals or arguments of the creation of (our/a) project. In the set of sections here gathered we try to give notice to the movements, incurses or approaches that have been carried out, both on the projects-of-architecture of the masters as well on our own essay circumstances - to recognize an inherited body with a future purpose, at the fair distance. Admitting the arbitrariness of the architectural form, that provides from the liberty associated to its creation, and the unrest that this consciousness generates against the infinite panorama of possibilities of giving a form to the form, we seek for instruments, strategies, procedures, anchors or valid arguments to the project - we look for our own law in that freedom. Recognizing the complementary sense of every construction, we project in the task of drawing the space of "we", the reason of (our own) architecture. In order to be timely to architecture and to be a participant in the right tone, we attribute the project a procedural sense (as a resilience to the method idea) and explore the look, distance and limit as a way of building that adequacy problem; of building a posture, a certain way to look and intersect the world, of (re)concile what, at the start, wasn't (re)conciable.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-07
2018-11-07T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/116777
TID:202376680
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/116777
identifier_str_mv TID:202376680
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136077897793536