Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34904 |
Resumo: | The perceived offset of a moving target has been shown to be displaced forward, in the direction of motion (Representational Momentum; RM) and downward, in the direction of gravity (Representational Gravity; RG). Regarding RG, available evidence suggests that the ‘downward’ direction is chiefly determined by the orientation of the body’s main axis (idiotropic vector). However, a previous study reports increased displacements along gravity’s direction irrespective of the participants’ body orientation. These disparate reports might be accounted for by several differences between the methodologies used, prominently the type of motion displays – smooth or apparent motion –, known to significantly modulate spatial localization judgements. To clarify this issue, we report the outcomes of one experiment where strength of the motion signal (smooth vs apparent) was factorially crossed with participants’ body position relative to the vertical (upright vs left lateral decubitus) with a standard spatial localization task (using a trackball). Results reveal RG to be attached to the idiotropic vector and to be unaffected by vestibular signals, with motion type affecting the magnitude, but not the direction, of spatial displacements. |
id |
RCAP_980db18a094ca2d642e3c95ba600a0b5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/34904 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?Spatial orientationRepresentational gravityRepresentational momentumIdiotropic vectorStrength of the motion signalThe perceived offset of a moving target has been shown to be displaced forward, in the direction of motion (Representational Momentum; RM) and downward, in the direction of gravity (Representational Gravity; RG). Regarding RG, available evidence suggests that the ‘downward’ direction is chiefly determined by the orientation of the body’s main axis (idiotropic vector). However, a previous study reports increased displacements along gravity’s direction irrespective of the participants’ body orientation. These disparate reports might be accounted for by several differences between the methodologies used, prominently the type of motion displays – smooth or apparent motion –, known to significantly modulate spatial localization judgements. To clarify this issue, we report the outcomes of one experiment where strength of the motion signal (smooth vs apparent) was factorially crossed with participants’ body position relative to the vertical (upright vs left lateral decubitus) with a standard spatial localization task (using a trackball). Results reveal RG to be attached to the idiotropic vector and to be unaffected by vestibular signals, with motion type affecting the magnitude, but not the direction, of spatial displacements.A localização onde um objecto em movimento desaparece é percebida como desfasada para diante, na direcção do movimento (Momento Representacional; MR) e para baixo, na direcção da gravidade (Gravidade Representacional; RG). No que se refere à GR, estudos prévios sugerem que a direcção ‘para baixo’ é essencialmente determinada pela orientação do corpo do observador (vector idiotrópico). Contudo, um estudo prévio reportou resultados contrários, com maiores desfasamentos percebidos na direcção da gravidade, independentemente da posição do observador. Estes resultados opostos podem dever-se a várias diferenças metodológicas nas experiências conduzidas até ao momento, em particular o tipo de movimento do alvo – fluído ou aparente –, factor que se sabe afectar significativamente juízos de localizações espaciais. Por forma a clarificar este assunto, são aqui relatados os resultados de uma experiência em que a força do sinal de movimento (fluído vs aparente) foi factorialmente cruzado com a orientação do corpo dos observadores relativamente à vertical (sentados vs decúbito lateral) numa tarefa típica de localização espacial (usando uma trackball). Os resultados revelam que a GR depende do vector idiotrópico e não é modulada por sinais vestibulares, sendo que o tipo de movimento do alvo modula a magnitude, mas não a direcção, dos desfasamentos espaciais.2022-10-17T14:09:26Z2022-07-21T00:00:00Z2022-07-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/34904engLoureiro, Ana Raquel Pereirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-05-06T04:39:46Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/34904Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-05-06T04:39:46Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity? |
title |
Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity? |
spellingShingle |
Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity? Loureiro, Ana Raquel Pereira Spatial orientation Representational gravity Representational momentum Idiotropic vector Strength of the motion signal |
title_short |
Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity? |
title_full |
Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity? |
title_fullStr |
Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity? |
title_sort |
Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity? |
author |
Loureiro, Ana Raquel Pereira |
author_facet |
Loureiro, Ana Raquel Pereira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Loureiro, Ana Raquel Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Spatial orientation Representational gravity Representational momentum Idiotropic vector Strength of the motion signal |
topic |
Spatial orientation Representational gravity Representational momentum Idiotropic vector Strength of the motion signal |
description |
The perceived offset of a moving target has been shown to be displaced forward, in the direction of motion (Representational Momentum; RM) and downward, in the direction of gravity (Representational Gravity; RG). Regarding RG, available evidence suggests that the ‘downward’ direction is chiefly determined by the orientation of the body’s main axis (idiotropic vector). However, a previous study reports increased displacements along gravity’s direction irrespective of the participants’ body orientation. These disparate reports might be accounted for by several differences between the methodologies used, prominently the type of motion displays – smooth or apparent motion –, known to significantly modulate spatial localization judgements. To clarify this issue, we report the outcomes of one experiment where strength of the motion signal (smooth vs apparent) was factorially crossed with participants’ body position relative to the vertical (upright vs left lateral decubitus) with a standard spatial localization task (using a trackball). Results reveal RG to be attached to the idiotropic vector and to be unaffected by vestibular signals, with motion type affecting the magnitude, but not the direction, of spatial displacements. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-17T14:09:26Z 2022-07-21T00:00:00Z 2022-07-21 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34904 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34904 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817543824418799616 |