Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Loureiro, Ana Raquel Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34904
Resumo: The perceived offset of a moving target has been shown to be displaced forward, in the direction of motion (Representational Momentum; RM) and downward, in the direction of gravity (Representational Gravity; RG). Regarding RG, available evidence suggests that the ‘downward’ direction is chiefly determined by the orientation of the body’s main axis (idiotropic vector). However, a previous study reports increased displacements along gravity’s direction irrespective of the participants’ body orientation. These disparate reports might be accounted for by several differences between the methodologies used, prominently the type of motion displays – smooth or apparent motion –, known to significantly modulate spatial localization judgements. To clarify this issue, we report the outcomes of one experiment where strength of the motion signal (smooth vs apparent) was factorially crossed with participants’ body position relative to the vertical (upright vs left lateral decubitus) with a standard spatial localization task (using a trackball). Results reveal RG to be attached to the idiotropic vector and to be unaffected by vestibular signals, with motion type affecting the magnitude, but not the direction, of spatial displacements.
id RCAP_980db18a094ca2d642e3c95ba600a0b5
oai_identifier_str oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/34904
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?Spatial orientationRepresentational gravityRepresentational momentumIdiotropic vectorStrength of the motion signalThe perceived offset of a moving target has been shown to be displaced forward, in the direction of motion (Representational Momentum; RM) and downward, in the direction of gravity (Representational Gravity; RG). Regarding RG, available evidence suggests that the ‘downward’ direction is chiefly determined by the orientation of the body’s main axis (idiotropic vector). However, a previous study reports increased displacements along gravity’s direction irrespective of the participants’ body orientation. These disparate reports might be accounted for by several differences between the methodologies used, prominently the type of motion displays – smooth or apparent motion –, known to significantly modulate spatial localization judgements. To clarify this issue, we report the outcomes of one experiment where strength of the motion signal (smooth vs apparent) was factorially crossed with participants’ body position relative to the vertical (upright vs left lateral decubitus) with a standard spatial localization task (using a trackball). Results reveal RG to be attached to the idiotropic vector and to be unaffected by vestibular signals, with motion type affecting the magnitude, but not the direction, of spatial displacements.A localização onde um objecto em movimento desaparece é percebida como desfasada para diante, na direcção do movimento (Momento Representacional; MR) e para baixo, na direcção da gravidade (Gravidade Representacional; RG). No que se refere à GR, estudos prévios sugerem que a direcção ‘para baixo’ é essencialmente determinada pela orientação do corpo do observador (vector idiotrópico). Contudo, um estudo prévio reportou resultados contrários, com maiores desfasamentos percebidos na direcção da gravidade, independentemente da posição do observador. Estes resultados opostos podem dever-se a várias diferenças metodológicas nas experiências conduzidas até ao momento, em particular o tipo de movimento do alvo – fluído ou aparente –, factor que se sabe afectar significativamente juízos de localizações espaciais. Por forma a clarificar este assunto, são aqui relatados os resultados de uma experiência em que a força do sinal de movimento (fluído vs aparente) foi factorialmente cruzado com a orientação do corpo dos observadores relativamente à vertical (sentados vs decúbito lateral) numa tarefa típica de localização espacial (usando uma trackball). Os resultados revelam que a GR depende do vector idiotrópico e não é modulada por sinais vestibulares, sendo que o tipo de movimento do alvo modula a magnitude, mas não a direcção, dos desfasamentos espaciais.2022-10-17T14:09:26Z2022-07-21T00:00:00Z2022-07-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/34904engLoureiro, Ana Raquel Pereirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-05-06T04:39:46Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/34904Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-05-06T04:39:46Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?
title Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?
spellingShingle Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?
Loureiro, Ana Raquel Pereira
Spatial orientation
Representational gravity
Representational momentum
Idiotropic vector
Strength of the motion signal
title_short Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?
title_full Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?
title_fullStr Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?
title_full_unstemmed Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?
title_sort Motion signal strength and body orientation: which way is ‘down’ for representational gravity?
author Loureiro, Ana Raquel Pereira
author_facet Loureiro, Ana Raquel Pereira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loureiro, Ana Raquel Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spatial orientation
Representational gravity
Representational momentum
Idiotropic vector
Strength of the motion signal
topic Spatial orientation
Representational gravity
Representational momentum
Idiotropic vector
Strength of the motion signal
description The perceived offset of a moving target has been shown to be displaced forward, in the direction of motion (Representational Momentum; RM) and downward, in the direction of gravity (Representational Gravity; RG). Regarding RG, available evidence suggests that the ‘downward’ direction is chiefly determined by the orientation of the body’s main axis (idiotropic vector). However, a previous study reports increased displacements along gravity’s direction irrespective of the participants’ body orientation. These disparate reports might be accounted for by several differences between the methodologies used, prominently the type of motion displays – smooth or apparent motion –, known to significantly modulate spatial localization judgements. To clarify this issue, we report the outcomes of one experiment where strength of the motion signal (smooth vs apparent) was factorially crossed with participants’ body position relative to the vertical (upright vs left lateral decubitus) with a standard spatial localization task (using a trackball). Results reveal RG to be attached to the idiotropic vector and to be unaffected by vestibular signals, with motion type affecting the magnitude, but not the direction, of spatial displacements.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-17T14:09:26Z
2022-07-21T00:00:00Z
2022-07-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34904
url http://hdl.handle.net/10773/34904
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817543824418799616