Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Videira, Sara
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Matilde, Silva, Manuela Vieira da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/25172
Resumo: This review aims to identify and analyze the instruments employed for assessing the overall performance of workers exposed to fluoroscopy during surgical procedures and/or interventional procedures, using the PRISMA methodology. The studies were located through searches conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Lilacs, ScienceDirect, B-ON, EBSCOhost, and EBSCO Discovery Service on March 27, 2023. Additional studies were identified using backward and forward citation techniques. The PEO strategic model was followed. The search spanned studies published between 2012 and 2022. The quality of the studies underwent assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Out of the 23 studies identified, encompassing 3604 individuals, 12 (52%) addressed the reliability and/or validity of the instruments, while 3 (13%) focused on the development and psychometric testing of the instruments. Only 5 instruments (23%), validated and reliable, exclusively evaluated occupational radiological protection. The predominant dimension covered was knowledge (82%, n = 19). The population was assessed in 18 studies, pre- and post-intervention in 2 studies, and 21 studies provided recommendations or tools for improvement. Individuals in the studies utilized passive dosimeters (ranging from 5% to 98%), thyroid shields (15% to 98%), and aprons or lead skirts/coats (28% to 99%). The evidence quality was moderate (6/8). This study underscores the imperative to enhance compliance with protective and monitoring equipment. Furthermore, additional information is warranted concerning the validity and reliability of the instruments used, as well as the development of instruments that are both valid and reliable.
id RCAP_98831c3e1f48f4461d4d423138ae7650
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/25172
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature reviewInterventional proceduresOccupationalQuestionnaireRadiation protectionReliabilitySurgical proceduresValidityX-radiationThis review aims to identify and analyze the instruments employed for assessing the overall performance of workers exposed to fluoroscopy during surgical procedures and/or interventional procedures, using the PRISMA methodology. The studies were located through searches conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Lilacs, ScienceDirect, B-ON, EBSCOhost, and EBSCO Discovery Service on March 27, 2023. Additional studies were identified using backward and forward citation techniques. The PEO strategic model was followed. The search spanned studies published between 2012 and 2022. The quality of the studies underwent assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Out of the 23 studies identified, encompassing 3604 individuals, 12 (52%) addressed the reliability and/or validity of the instruments, while 3 (13%) focused on the development and psychometric testing of the instruments. Only 5 instruments (23%), validated and reliable, exclusively evaluated occupational radiological protection. The predominant dimension covered was knowledge (82%, n = 19). The population was assessed in 18 studies, pre- and post-intervention in 2 studies, and 21 studies provided recommendations or tools for improvement. Individuals in the studies utilized passive dosimeters (ranging from 5% to 98%), thyroid shields (15% to 98%), and aprons or lead skirts/coats (28% to 99%). The evidence quality was moderate (6/8). This study underscores the imperative to enhance compliance with protective and monitoring equipment. Furthermore, additional information is warranted concerning the validity and reliability of the instruments used, as well as the development of instruments that are both valid and reliable.ElsevierRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoVideira, SaraRodrigues, MatildeSilva, Manuela Vieira da2024-03-052025-03-05T00:00:00Z2024-03-05T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/25172engVideira, S., Rodrigues, M., & Silva, M. V. (2024). Worker’s exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review. Preventive Medicine, 107913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.1079130091-743510.1016/j.ypmed.2024.1079131096-0260info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-20T01:47:10Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/25172Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:47:10Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review
title Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review
spellingShingle Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review
Videira, Sara
Interventional procedures
Occupational
Questionnaire
Radiation protection
Reliability
Surgical procedures
ValidityX-radiation
title_short Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review
title_full Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review
title_fullStr Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review
title_sort Worker's exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review
author Videira, Sara
author_facet Videira, Sara
Rodrigues, Matilde
Silva, Manuela Vieira da
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Matilde
Silva, Manuela Vieira da
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Videira, Sara
Rodrigues, Matilde
Silva, Manuela Vieira da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Interventional procedures
Occupational
Questionnaire
Radiation protection
Reliability
Surgical procedures
ValidityX-radiation
topic Interventional procedures
Occupational
Questionnaire
Radiation protection
Reliability
Surgical procedures
ValidityX-radiation
description This review aims to identify and analyze the instruments employed for assessing the overall performance of workers exposed to fluoroscopy during surgical procedures and/or interventional procedures, using the PRISMA methodology. The studies were located through searches conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Lilacs, ScienceDirect, B-ON, EBSCOhost, and EBSCO Discovery Service on March 27, 2023. Additional studies were identified using backward and forward citation techniques. The PEO strategic model was followed. The search spanned studies published between 2012 and 2022. The quality of the studies underwent assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Out of the 23 studies identified, encompassing 3604 individuals, 12 (52%) addressed the reliability and/or validity of the instruments, while 3 (13%) focused on the development and psychometric testing of the instruments. Only 5 instruments (23%), validated and reliable, exclusively evaluated occupational radiological protection. The predominant dimension covered was knowledge (82%, n = 19). The population was assessed in 18 studies, pre- and post-intervention in 2 studies, and 21 studies provided recommendations or tools for improvement. Individuals in the studies utilized passive dosimeters (ranging from 5% to 98%), thyroid shields (15% to 98%), and aprons or lead skirts/coats (28% to 99%). The evidence quality was moderate (6/8). This study underscores the imperative to enhance compliance with protective and monitoring equipment. Furthermore, additional information is warranted concerning the validity and reliability of the instruments used, as well as the development of instruments that are both valid and reliable.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-05
2024-03-05T00:00:00Z
2025-03-05T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/25172
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/25172
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Videira, S., Rodrigues, M., & Silva, M. V. (2024). Worker’s exposure to radiation in fluoroscopy, assessing and instruments: A systematic literature review. Preventive Medicine, 107913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107913
0091-7435
10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107913
1096-0260
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817543216050733056