The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tavares, J. B.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Leite, Ema Sacadura, Matoso, T., Neto, L. L., Biscoito, L., Campos, Jorge Guedes, Sousa-Uva, A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019916628322
Resumo: Background In interventional neuroradiology, few operators routinely use radiation protection glasses. Moreover, in most centers, radiation dose data only accounts for whole body dose without specific information on lens dose. In 2012, the International Commission on Radiological Protection advised that the threshold limit value for the lens should be 20 mSv/year instead of the previous 150 mSv/year limit. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose in the operator's lens during real diagnostic and interventional neuroangiographies, either using or without lead protection glasses. Methods Using the Educational Direct Dosimeter (EDD30 dosimeter), accumulated radiation dose in the lens was measured in 13 neuroangiographies: seven diagnostic and six interventional. Operators with and without radiation protection glasses were included and the sensor was placed near their left eye, closest to the radiation beam. Results Without glasses, the corrected mean dose of radiation in the lens was 8.02 μSv for diagnostic procedures and 168.57 μSv for interventional procedures. Using glasses, these values were reduced to 1.74 μSv and 33.24 μSv, respectively. Conclusion Considering 20 mSv as the suggested annual limit of equivalent dose in the lens, neuroradiologists may perform up to 2,494 diagnostic procedures per year without protecting glasses, a number that increases to 11,494 when glasses are used consistently. Regarding intervention, a maximum of 119 procedures per year is advised if glasses are not used, whereas up to 602 procedures/year may be performed using this protection. Therefore, neuroradiologists should always wear radiation protection glasses.
id RCAP_98d6b8dbd0b9ca19a7268e0d52fe8774
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/31499
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographiesA study on radiation exposure at the lens of the primary operatorlead protection glasseslens radiation exposureRadiation protectionRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingClinical NeurologyCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineBackground In interventional neuroradiology, few operators routinely use radiation protection glasses. Moreover, in most centers, radiation dose data only accounts for whole body dose without specific information on lens dose. In 2012, the International Commission on Radiological Protection advised that the threshold limit value for the lens should be 20 mSv/year instead of the previous 150 mSv/year limit. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose in the operator's lens during real diagnostic and interventional neuroangiographies, either using or without lead protection glasses. Methods Using the Educational Direct Dosimeter (EDD30 dosimeter), accumulated radiation dose in the lens was measured in 13 neuroangiographies: seven diagnostic and six interventional. Operators with and without radiation protection glasses were included and the sensor was placed near their left eye, closest to the radiation beam. Results Without glasses, the corrected mean dose of radiation in the lens was 8.02 μSv for diagnostic procedures and 168.57 μSv for interventional procedures. Using glasses, these values were reduced to 1.74 μSv and 33.24 μSv, respectively. Conclusion Considering 20 mSv as the suggested annual limit of equivalent dose in the lens, neuroradiologists may perform up to 2,494 diagnostic procedures per year without protecting glasses, a number that increases to 11,494 when glasses are used consistently. Regarding intervention, a maximum of 119 procedures per year is advised if glasses are not used, whereas up to 602 procedures/year may be performed using this protection. Therefore, neuroradiologists should always wear radiation protection glasses.Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)RUNTavares, J. B.Leite, Ema SacaduraMatoso, T.Neto, L. L.Biscoito, L.Campos, Jorge GuedesSousa-Uva, A.2018-03-01T23:05:08Z20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article4application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1591019916628322eng1591-0199PURE: 2038765http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966577668&partnerID=8YFLogxKhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1591019916628322info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-10T15:42:51ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies
A study on radiation exposure at the lens of the primary operator
title The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies
spellingShingle The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies
Tavares, J. B.
lead protection glasses
lens radiation exposure
Radiation protection
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Clinical Neurology
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
title_short The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies
title_full The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies
title_fullStr The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies
title_full_unstemmed The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies
title_sort The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies
author Tavares, J. B.
author_facet Tavares, J. B.
Leite, Ema Sacadura
Matoso, T.
Neto, L. L.
Biscoito, L.
Campos, Jorge Guedes
Sousa-Uva, A.
author_role author
author2 Leite, Ema Sacadura
Matoso, T.
Neto, L. L.
Biscoito, L.
Campos, Jorge Guedes
Sousa-Uva, A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tavares, J. B.
Leite, Ema Sacadura
Matoso, T.
Neto, L. L.
Biscoito, L.
Campos, Jorge Guedes
Sousa-Uva, A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv lead protection glasses
lens radiation exposure
Radiation protection
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Clinical Neurology
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
topic lead protection glasses
lens radiation exposure
Radiation protection
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Clinical Neurology
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
description Background In interventional neuroradiology, few operators routinely use radiation protection glasses. Moreover, in most centers, radiation dose data only accounts for whole body dose without specific information on lens dose. In 2012, the International Commission on Radiological Protection advised that the threshold limit value for the lens should be 20 mSv/year instead of the previous 150 mSv/year limit. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose in the operator's lens during real diagnostic and interventional neuroangiographies, either using or without lead protection glasses. Methods Using the Educational Direct Dosimeter (EDD30 dosimeter), accumulated radiation dose in the lens was measured in 13 neuroangiographies: seven diagnostic and six interventional. Operators with and without radiation protection glasses were included and the sensor was placed near their left eye, closest to the radiation beam. Results Without glasses, the corrected mean dose of radiation in the lens was 8.02 μSv for diagnostic procedures and 168.57 μSv for interventional procedures. Using glasses, these values were reduced to 1.74 μSv and 33.24 μSv, respectively. Conclusion Considering 20 mSv as the suggested annual limit of equivalent dose in the lens, neuroradiologists may perform up to 2,494 diagnostic procedures per year without protecting glasses, a number that increases to 11,494 when glasses are used consistently. Regarding intervention, a maximum of 119 procedures per year is advised if glasses are not used, whereas up to 602 procedures/year may be performed using this protection. Therefore, neuroradiologists should always wear radiation protection glasses.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-03-01T23:05:08Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019916628322
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019916628322
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1591-0199
PURE: 2038765
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966577668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019916628322
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 4
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777302959381544960