Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pezarat-Correia, Pedro
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Medeiros, Pedro, Fernandes, Orlando, Vaz, João, Silva, Luís, Moraes, António
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270
https://doi.org/10.33155/j.ramd.2020.03.004
Resumo: Objective: To quantify and compare the electromyographic activity of 10 muscles in three pullover exercises. Methods: 15 healthy men, with at least two years of experience in resistance training, executed in random order six repetitions with 60% of 1 Maximum Repetition for three different pullover exercises: lying on a step with a barbell, grip 100% biacromial (E1); lying on a step with a barbell, grip 150% (E2); lying on a Swiss ball with a barbell, grip 100% (E3). Surface electromyography was recorded from the Deltoideus (Clavicular and Spinalis Pars), Pectoralis Major (Clavicular and Sternocostalis Pars), Serratus Anterior, Triceps Brachii (Long Head), Latissimus Dorsi, Infraspinatus, Rectus Abdominis, Obliquus Internus Abdominis and Transversus Abdominis. The normalized Maximum Repetition electromyographyc of each muscle was calculated for each exercise. Results: The most engaged muscles were Infraspinatus (51-53%) and Posterior Deltoid (49-51%). Surface electromyography activity was similar between the E1, E2 and E3 exercises. Conclusions: This study quantified muscular solicitation during pullover exercises performed with 60% Maximum Repetition. The muscles with higher level of activation were the Posterior Deltoid and the Infraspinatus, suggesting that pullover may be a valid option for strengthening the dynamic stabilizing muscles of shoulder joint in trained individuals. No significant differences in muscle electromyography intensity were observed when grip distance and trunk stabilization were altered, showing that these conditions do not influence muscle activation levels. However, the 1 Maximum Repetition was lower when the pullover was performed on a Swiss ball, suggesting that it is possible to obtain higher level of muscle recruitment with lower weights in unstable exercises.
id RCAP_9a21e8e65d57dd9a926fe177e769763c
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/34270
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercisestrunk muscleshoulder musclesmuscle activationEMGpullover exercisesObjective: To quantify and compare the electromyographic activity of 10 muscles in three pullover exercises. Methods: 15 healthy men, with at least two years of experience in resistance training, executed in random order six repetitions with 60% of 1 Maximum Repetition for three different pullover exercises: lying on a step with a barbell, grip 100% biacromial (E1); lying on a step with a barbell, grip 150% (E2); lying on a Swiss ball with a barbell, grip 100% (E3). Surface electromyography was recorded from the Deltoideus (Clavicular and Spinalis Pars), Pectoralis Major (Clavicular and Sternocostalis Pars), Serratus Anterior, Triceps Brachii (Long Head), Latissimus Dorsi, Infraspinatus, Rectus Abdominis, Obliquus Internus Abdominis and Transversus Abdominis. The normalized Maximum Repetition electromyographyc of each muscle was calculated for each exercise. Results: The most engaged muscles were Infraspinatus (51-53%) and Posterior Deltoid (49-51%). Surface electromyography activity was similar between the E1, E2 and E3 exercises. Conclusions: This study quantified muscular solicitation during pullover exercises performed with 60% Maximum Repetition. The muscles with higher level of activation were the Posterior Deltoid and the Infraspinatus, suggesting that pullover may be a valid option for strengthening the dynamic stabilizing muscles of shoulder joint in trained individuals. No significant differences in muscle electromyography intensity were observed when grip distance and trunk stabilization were altered, showing that these conditions do not influence muscle activation levels. However, the 1 Maximum Repetition was lower when the pullover was performed on a Swiss ball, suggesting that it is possible to obtain higher level of muscle recruitment with lower weights in unstable exercises.Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte2023-02-13T17:35:26Z2023-02-132020-03-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270https://doi.org/10.33155/j.ramd.2020.03.004por127-133https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365578638_Comparison_of_shoulder_and_trunk_muscle_activation_between_different_pullover_exercises13(3)Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deportendndorlandoj@uevora.ptndndnd251Pezarat-Correia, PedroMedeiros, PedroFernandes, OrlandoVaz, JoãoSilva, LuísMoraes, Antónioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:36:45Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/34270Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:22:54.852065Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises
title Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises
spellingShingle Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises
Pezarat-Correia, Pedro
trunk muscle
shoulder muscles
muscle activation
EMG
pullover exercises
title_short Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises
title_full Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises
title_fullStr Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises
title_sort Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises
author Pezarat-Correia, Pedro
author_facet Pezarat-Correia, Pedro
Medeiros, Pedro
Fernandes, Orlando
Vaz, João
Silva, Luís
Moraes, António
author_role author
author2 Medeiros, Pedro
Fernandes, Orlando
Vaz, João
Silva, Luís
Moraes, António
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pezarat-Correia, Pedro
Medeiros, Pedro
Fernandes, Orlando
Vaz, João
Silva, Luís
Moraes, António
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv trunk muscle
shoulder muscles
muscle activation
EMG
pullover exercises
topic trunk muscle
shoulder muscles
muscle activation
EMG
pullover exercises
description Objective: To quantify and compare the electromyographic activity of 10 muscles in three pullover exercises. Methods: 15 healthy men, with at least two years of experience in resistance training, executed in random order six repetitions with 60% of 1 Maximum Repetition for three different pullover exercises: lying on a step with a barbell, grip 100% biacromial (E1); lying on a step with a barbell, grip 150% (E2); lying on a Swiss ball with a barbell, grip 100% (E3). Surface electromyography was recorded from the Deltoideus (Clavicular and Spinalis Pars), Pectoralis Major (Clavicular and Sternocostalis Pars), Serratus Anterior, Triceps Brachii (Long Head), Latissimus Dorsi, Infraspinatus, Rectus Abdominis, Obliquus Internus Abdominis and Transversus Abdominis. The normalized Maximum Repetition electromyographyc of each muscle was calculated for each exercise. Results: The most engaged muscles were Infraspinatus (51-53%) and Posterior Deltoid (49-51%). Surface electromyography activity was similar between the E1, E2 and E3 exercises. Conclusions: This study quantified muscular solicitation during pullover exercises performed with 60% Maximum Repetition. The muscles with higher level of activation were the Posterior Deltoid and the Infraspinatus, suggesting that pullover may be a valid option for strengthening the dynamic stabilizing muscles of shoulder joint in trained individuals. No significant differences in muscle electromyography intensity were observed when grip distance and trunk stabilization were altered, showing that these conditions do not influence muscle activation levels. However, the 1 Maximum Repetition was lower when the pullover was performed on a Swiss ball, suggesting that it is possible to obtain higher level of muscle recruitment with lower weights in unstable exercises.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-01T00:00:00Z
2023-02-13T17:35:26Z
2023-02-13
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270
https://doi.org/10.33155/j.ramd.2020.03.004
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270
https://doi.org/10.33155/j.ramd.2020.03.004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 127-133
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365578638_Comparison_of_shoulder_and_trunk_muscle_activation_between_different_pullover_exercises
13(3)
Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte
nd
nd
orlandoj@uevora.pt
nd
nd
nd
251
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136711284883456