Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270 https://doi.org/10.33155/j.ramd.2020.03.004 |
Resumo: | Objective: To quantify and compare the electromyographic activity of 10 muscles in three pullover exercises. Methods: 15 healthy men, with at least two years of experience in resistance training, executed in random order six repetitions with 60% of 1 Maximum Repetition for three different pullover exercises: lying on a step with a barbell, grip 100% biacromial (E1); lying on a step with a barbell, grip 150% (E2); lying on a Swiss ball with a barbell, grip 100% (E3). Surface electromyography was recorded from the Deltoideus (Clavicular and Spinalis Pars), Pectoralis Major (Clavicular and Sternocostalis Pars), Serratus Anterior, Triceps Brachii (Long Head), Latissimus Dorsi, Infraspinatus, Rectus Abdominis, Obliquus Internus Abdominis and Transversus Abdominis. The normalized Maximum Repetition electromyographyc of each muscle was calculated for each exercise. Results: The most engaged muscles were Infraspinatus (51-53%) and Posterior Deltoid (49-51%). Surface electromyography activity was similar between the E1, E2 and E3 exercises. Conclusions: This study quantified muscular solicitation during pullover exercises performed with 60% Maximum Repetition. The muscles with higher level of activation were the Posterior Deltoid and the Infraspinatus, suggesting that pullover may be a valid option for strengthening the dynamic stabilizing muscles of shoulder joint in trained individuals. No significant differences in muscle electromyography intensity were observed when grip distance and trunk stabilization were altered, showing that these conditions do not influence muscle activation levels. However, the 1 Maximum Repetition was lower when the pullover was performed on a Swiss ball, suggesting that it is possible to obtain higher level of muscle recruitment with lower weights in unstable exercises. |
id |
RCAP_9a21e8e65d57dd9a926fe177e769763c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/34270 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercisestrunk muscleshoulder musclesmuscle activationEMGpullover exercisesObjective: To quantify and compare the electromyographic activity of 10 muscles in three pullover exercises. Methods: 15 healthy men, with at least two years of experience in resistance training, executed in random order six repetitions with 60% of 1 Maximum Repetition for three different pullover exercises: lying on a step with a barbell, grip 100% biacromial (E1); lying on a step with a barbell, grip 150% (E2); lying on a Swiss ball with a barbell, grip 100% (E3). Surface electromyography was recorded from the Deltoideus (Clavicular and Spinalis Pars), Pectoralis Major (Clavicular and Sternocostalis Pars), Serratus Anterior, Triceps Brachii (Long Head), Latissimus Dorsi, Infraspinatus, Rectus Abdominis, Obliquus Internus Abdominis and Transversus Abdominis. The normalized Maximum Repetition electromyographyc of each muscle was calculated for each exercise. Results: The most engaged muscles were Infraspinatus (51-53%) and Posterior Deltoid (49-51%). Surface electromyography activity was similar between the E1, E2 and E3 exercises. Conclusions: This study quantified muscular solicitation during pullover exercises performed with 60% Maximum Repetition. The muscles with higher level of activation were the Posterior Deltoid and the Infraspinatus, suggesting that pullover may be a valid option for strengthening the dynamic stabilizing muscles of shoulder joint in trained individuals. No significant differences in muscle electromyography intensity were observed when grip distance and trunk stabilization were altered, showing that these conditions do not influence muscle activation levels. However, the 1 Maximum Repetition was lower when the pullover was performed on a Swiss ball, suggesting that it is possible to obtain higher level of muscle recruitment with lower weights in unstable exercises.Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte2023-02-13T17:35:26Z2023-02-132020-03-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270https://doi.org/10.33155/j.ramd.2020.03.004por127-133https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365578638_Comparison_of_shoulder_and_trunk_muscle_activation_between_different_pullover_exercises13(3)Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deportendndorlandoj@uevora.ptndndnd251Pezarat-Correia, PedroMedeiros, PedroFernandes, OrlandoVaz, JoãoSilva, LuísMoraes, Antónioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:36:45Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/34270Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:22:54.852065Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises |
title |
Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises Pezarat-Correia, Pedro trunk muscle shoulder muscles muscle activation EMG pullover exercises |
title_short |
Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises |
title_full |
Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises |
title_sort |
Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises |
author |
Pezarat-Correia, Pedro |
author_facet |
Pezarat-Correia, Pedro Medeiros, Pedro Fernandes, Orlando Vaz, João Silva, Luís Moraes, António |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Medeiros, Pedro Fernandes, Orlando Vaz, João Silva, Luís Moraes, António |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pezarat-Correia, Pedro Medeiros, Pedro Fernandes, Orlando Vaz, João Silva, Luís Moraes, António |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
trunk muscle shoulder muscles muscle activation EMG pullover exercises |
topic |
trunk muscle shoulder muscles muscle activation EMG pullover exercises |
description |
Objective: To quantify and compare the electromyographic activity of 10 muscles in three pullover exercises. Methods: 15 healthy men, with at least two years of experience in resistance training, executed in random order six repetitions with 60% of 1 Maximum Repetition for three different pullover exercises: lying on a step with a barbell, grip 100% biacromial (E1); lying on a step with a barbell, grip 150% (E2); lying on a Swiss ball with a barbell, grip 100% (E3). Surface electromyography was recorded from the Deltoideus (Clavicular and Spinalis Pars), Pectoralis Major (Clavicular and Sternocostalis Pars), Serratus Anterior, Triceps Brachii (Long Head), Latissimus Dorsi, Infraspinatus, Rectus Abdominis, Obliquus Internus Abdominis and Transversus Abdominis. The normalized Maximum Repetition electromyographyc of each muscle was calculated for each exercise. Results: The most engaged muscles were Infraspinatus (51-53%) and Posterior Deltoid (49-51%). Surface electromyography activity was similar between the E1, E2 and E3 exercises. Conclusions: This study quantified muscular solicitation during pullover exercises performed with 60% Maximum Repetition. The muscles with higher level of activation were the Posterior Deltoid and the Infraspinatus, suggesting that pullover may be a valid option for strengthening the dynamic stabilizing muscles of shoulder joint in trained individuals. No significant differences in muscle electromyography intensity were observed when grip distance and trunk stabilization were altered, showing that these conditions do not influence muscle activation levels. However, the 1 Maximum Repetition was lower when the pullover was performed on a Swiss ball, suggesting that it is possible to obtain higher level of muscle recruitment with lower weights in unstable exercises. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-01T00:00:00Z 2023-02-13T17:35:26Z 2023-02-13 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270 https://doi.org/10.33155/j.ramd.2020.03.004 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270 https://doi.org/10.33155/j.ramd.2020.03.004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
127-133 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365578638_Comparison_of_shoulder_and_trunk_muscle_activation_between_different_pullover_exercises 13(3) Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte nd nd orlandoj@uevora.pt nd nd nd 251 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136711284883456 |