“Who Are We Writing For?”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lindblad, Sverker
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Pettersson, Daniel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.25749/sis.28905
Resumo: This study is based on an interest in interaction between science and society and how this structures science and society in tandem. In order to capture such interaction, we are analysing statements in scientific publications. The purpose of this study is to analyse relevancing in scientific publications by studying who are addressed by the research contributions and why these are considered to be relevant. Our case is the field of research labelled as International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSA), such as the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), created to analyse relations between educational designs and student performances. We identified a large set of research publications by means of the search engines Web of Science and Scopus. We selected publications that were peer reviewed and based on empirical comparisons between at least two countries. A large majority were only analysing student achievement, and few were researching impacts of educational variations. Relevance statements were mostly addressing policymakers. These findings are indicating strong social structuring of much ILSA research.
id RCAP_9a91f3db5357785d3c9285a831c468da
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/28905
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling “Who Are We Writing For?”“¿Para Quién Escribimos?”“Para Quem Estamos a Escrever?”ArticlesThis study is based on an interest in interaction between science and society and how this structures science and society in tandem. In order to capture such interaction, we are analysing statements in scientific publications. The purpose of this study is to analyse relevancing in scientific publications by studying who are addressed by the research contributions and why these are considered to be relevant. Our case is the field of research labelled as International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSA), such as the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), created to analyse relations between educational designs and student performances. We identified a large set of research publications by means of the search engines Web of Science and Scopus. We selected publications that were peer reviewed and based on empirical comparisons between at least two countries. A large majority were only analysing student achievement, and few were researching impacts of educational variations. Relevance statements were mostly addressing policymakers. These findings are indicating strong social structuring of much ILSA research.Este estudio se basa en un interés por la interacción entre ciencia y sociedad y cómo esto estructura la ciencia y la sociedad en conjunto. Para capturar tal interacción, analizamos declaraciones en publicaciones científicas. El propósito de este estudio es analizar relevancing en las publicaciones científicas estudiando a quiénes se dirigen las contribuciones de investigación y por qué se consideran relevantes. Nuestro caso es el campo de investigación denominado ILSA - Evaluaciones Internacionales a Gran Escala, como el Programa para la Evaluación Internacional de Alumnos (PISA) de la OCDE, diseñado para analizar las relaciones entre los modelos educativos y el desempeño de los estudiantes. Identificamos un gran conjunto de publicaciones de investigación a través de los motores de búsqueda Web of Science y Scopus. Seleccionamos publicaciones revisadas por pares y basadas en comparaciones empíricas entre al menos dos países. Una gran mayoría solo analizaba el rendimiento de los estudiantes, y pocos investigaban los impactos de las variaciones educativas. Las reivindicaciones de relevancia se dirigieron sobre todo a los responsables políticos. Estos hallazgos indican una fuerte estructuración social de gran parte de la investigación de ILSA.Este estudo tem por base um interesse na interação entre ciência e sociedade e como isto estrutura a ciência e a sociedade em conjunto. De modo a captar tais interações, analisamos afirmações em publicações científicas. A finalidade deste estudo consiste em analisar o relevancing em publicações científicas através da análise dos destinatários a quem os contributos da investigação são endereçados e porque estes são considerados relevantes. O nosso caso é a área de investigação chamada ILSA – Avaliações Internacionais em Grande Escala, como o Programa Internacional de Avaliação de Alunos (PISA) da OCDE, concebido para analisar as relações entre modelos educativos e desempenhos dos estudantes. Identificámos um grande grupo de publicações de investigações através dos motores de busca Web of Science e Scopus. Selecionámos publicações revistas por pares e baseadas em comparações empíricas entre pelo menos dois países. Uma grande maioria analisava apenas o aproveitamento dos alunos, havendo poucos a investigar os impactos de variações educativas. As afirmações de relevância eram endereçadas acima de tudo aos decisores políticos. Estes resultados indicam uma estruturação social forte de grande parte da investigação ILSA.Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa (Lisboa, Portugal)2023-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.25749/sis.28905eng2182-96402182-8474Lindblad, SverkerPettersson, Danielinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-07T08:15:26Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/28905Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:02:43.410317Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “Who Are We Writing For?”
“¿Para Quién Escribimos?”
“Para Quem Estamos a Escrever?”
title “Who Are We Writing For?”
spellingShingle “Who Are We Writing For?”
Lindblad, Sverker
Articles
title_short “Who Are We Writing For?”
title_full “Who Are We Writing For?”
title_fullStr “Who Are We Writing For?”
title_full_unstemmed “Who Are We Writing For?”
title_sort “Who Are We Writing For?”
author Lindblad, Sverker
author_facet Lindblad, Sverker
Pettersson, Daniel
author_role author
author2 Pettersson, Daniel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lindblad, Sverker
Pettersson, Daniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Articles
topic Articles
description This study is based on an interest in interaction between science and society and how this structures science and society in tandem. In order to capture such interaction, we are analysing statements in scientific publications. The purpose of this study is to analyse relevancing in scientific publications by studying who are addressed by the research contributions and why these are considered to be relevant. Our case is the field of research labelled as International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSA), such as the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), created to analyse relations between educational designs and student performances. We identified a large set of research publications by means of the search engines Web of Science and Scopus. We selected publications that were peer reviewed and based on empirical comparisons between at least two countries. A large majority were only analysing student achievement, and few were researching impacts of educational variations. Relevance statements were mostly addressing policymakers. These findings are indicating strong social structuring of much ILSA research.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.25749/sis.28905
url https://doi.org/10.25749/sis.28905
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2182-9640
2182-8474
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa (Lisboa, Portugal)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa (Lisboa, Portugal)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131692220284928