Sexuality, sexual behavior, and relationships of asexual individuals: Differences between aromantic and romantic orientation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, A.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, D. L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/25315
Resumo: Asexuality is a complex construct with a considerable lack of research until recently. Building upon available findings, we examined the extent to which romantic orientation shapes individual and relationship experiences, and expectations of asexual individuals. Specifically, our research focused on the distinction between romantic asexual individuals, who experience romantic attraction, and aromantic asexual individuals, who do not experience romantic attraction. A cross-sectional study with members of different asexual online communities (N = 447, 55.02% women; Mage = 24.77, SD = 7.21) aimed at examining how both groups differ in their identification with the asexuality construct as measured by the Asexuality Identification Scale (Yule et al., 2015), individual perspectives on sexuality, sexual behavior and relationships, concerns about commitment and sexual performance in a relationship, and attachment style. Results showed that aromantic asexual individuals identified more with asexuality, reported a more avoidant attachment style, and were more concerned with relationship commitment. In contrast, romantic asexual individuals reported less sex aversion, more sexual experiences (both past and current), and more sexual partners in the past. These individuals also engaged in romantic relationships more frequently in the past, had a stronger desire to engage in a romantic relationship in the future (either with or without sexual intimacy), and were more concerned with sexual performance. Overall, our findings contribute to the literature by highlighting the need to consider romantic orientation when examining asexuality and its interpersonal outcomes.
id RCAP_9c8a38ecbc94652706e338a259262731
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/25315
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Sexuality, sexual behavior, and relationships of asexual individuals: Differences between aromantic and romantic orientationAsexualityRomantic orientationRomanticSexualityRelationship outcomeAromanticAsexuality is a complex construct with a considerable lack of research until recently. Building upon available findings, we examined the extent to which romantic orientation shapes individual and relationship experiences, and expectations of asexual individuals. Specifically, our research focused on the distinction between romantic asexual individuals, who experience romantic attraction, and aromantic asexual individuals, who do not experience romantic attraction. A cross-sectional study with members of different asexual online communities (N = 447, 55.02% women; Mage = 24.77, SD = 7.21) aimed at examining how both groups differ in their identification with the asexuality construct as measured by the Asexuality Identification Scale (Yule et al., 2015), individual perspectives on sexuality, sexual behavior and relationships, concerns about commitment and sexual performance in a relationship, and attachment style. Results showed that aromantic asexual individuals identified more with asexuality, reported a more avoidant attachment style, and were more concerned with relationship commitment. In contrast, romantic asexual individuals reported less sex aversion, more sexual experiences (both past and current), and more sexual partners in the past. These individuals also engaged in romantic relationships more frequently in the past, had a stronger desire to engage in a romantic relationship in the future (either with or without sexual intimacy), and were more concerned with sexual performance. Overall, our findings contribute to the literature by highlighting the need to consider romantic orientation when examining asexuality and its interpersonal outcomes.Springer2023-03-25T00:00:00Z2022-01-01T00:00:00Z20222023-04-01T14:33:56Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/25315eng0004-000210.1007/s10508-021-02187-2Carvalho, A.Rodrigues, D. L.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:32:21Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/25315Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:14:34.519779Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sexuality, sexual behavior, and relationships of asexual individuals: Differences between aromantic and romantic orientation
title Sexuality, sexual behavior, and relationships of asexual individuals: Differences between aromantic and romantic orientation
spellingShingle Sexuality, sexual behavior, and relationships of asexual individuals: Differences between aromantic and romantic orientation
Carvalho, A.
Asexuality
Romantic orientation
Romantic
Sexuality
Relationship outcome
Aromantic
title_short Sexuality, sexual behavior, and relationships of asexual individuals: Differences between aromantic and romantic orientation
title_full Sexuality, sexual behavior, and relationships of asexual individuals: Differences between aromantic and romantic orientation
title_fullStr Sexuality, sexual behavior, and relationships of asexual individuals: Differences between aromantic and romantic orientation
title_full_unstemmed Sexuality, sexual behavior, and relationships of asexual individuals: Differences between aromantic and romantic orientation
title_sort Sexuality, sexual behavior, and relationships of asexual individuals: Differences between aromantic and romantic orientation
author Carvalho, A.
author_facet Carvalho, A.
Rodrigues, D. L.
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, D. L.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, A.
Rodrigues, D. L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Asexuality
Romantic orientation
Romantic
Sexuality
Relationship outcome
Aromantic
topic Asexuality
Romantic orientation
Romantic
Sexuality
Relationship outcome
Aromantic
description Asexuality is a complex construct with a considerable lack of research until recently. Building upon available findings, we examined the extent to which romantic orientation shapes individual and relationship experiences, and expectations of asexual individuals. Specifically, our research focused on the distinction between romantic asexual individuals, who experience romantic attraction, and aromantic asexual individuals, who do not experience romantic attraction. A cross-sectional study with members of different asexual online communities (N = 447, 55.02% women; Mage = 24.77, SD = 7.21) aimed at examining how both groups differ in their identification with the asexuality construct as measured by the Asexuality Identification Scale (Yule et al., 2015), individual perspectives on sexuality, sexual behavior and relationships, concerns about commitment and sexual performance in a relationship, and attachment style. Results showed that aromantic asexual individuals identified more with asexuality, reported a more avoidant attachment style, and were more concerned with relationship commitment. In contrast, romantic asexual individuals reported less sex aversion, more sexual experiences (both past and current), and more sexual partners in the past. These individuals also engaged in romantic relationships more frequently in the past, had a stronger desire to engage in a romantic relationship in the future (either with or without sexual intimacy), and were more concerned with sexual performance. Overall, our findings contribute to the literature by highlighting the need to consider romantic orientation when examining asexuality and its interpersonal outcomes.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022
2023-03-25T00:00:00Z
2023-04-01T14:33:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/25315
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/25315
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0004-0002
10.1007/s10508-021-02187-2
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134702891696128