The Public–Private Dichotomy in Fascist Corporativism: Discursive Strategies and Models of Legitimization

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cau, Maurizio
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i1.800
Resumo: The twentieth century starts with a rediscovery of the collective dimension that legal modernity had compressed. The vivid debate that came with the fascist corporatist experiment is an interesting observatory that lets us read this process against the light. According to the major part of Italian legal culture the corporatist cultural project seems to forewarn a new framework of the connections between public and private spheres, state and society, law and economics, statism and pluralism. Corporatism, which did not intend to build a non-statual model of authority, was an answer to the need to attribute legal value and legal autonomy to economic and social actors that weren’t adequately represented in the political and normative circuit. The paper is aimed at retracing some of the discursive strategies that characterized the corporatist experiment and the different legitimization models that were proposed by legal theory in order to rebuild the dichotomy between public and private spheres.
id RCAP_9c8f107231126e8801ea977b93d6c950
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/800
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Public–Private Dichotomy in Fascist Corporativism: Discursive Strategies and Models of Legitimizationcorporatism; fascism; legal theory; legitimizationThe twentieth century starts with a rediscovery of the collective dimension that legal modernity had compressed. The vivid debate that came with the fascist corporatist experiment is an interesting observatory that lets us read this process against the light. According to the major part of Italian legal culture the corporatist cultural project seems to forewarn a new framework of the connections between public and private spheres, state and society, law and economics, statism and pluralism. Corporatism, which did not intend to build a non-statual model of authority, was an answer to the need to attribute legal value and legal autonomy to economic and social actors that weren’t adequately represented in the political and normative circuit. The paper is aimed at retracing some of the discursive strategies that characterized the corporatist experiment and the different legitimization models that were proposed by legal theory in order to rebuild the dichotomy between public and private spheres.Cogitatio2017-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i1.800oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/800Politics and Governance; Vol 5, No 1 (2017): Legitimization of Private and Public Regulation: Past and Present; 26-332183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/800https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i1.800https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/800/800Copyright (c) 2017 Maurizio Cauhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCau, Maurizio2022-12-22T15:16:28Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/800Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:24.729537Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Public–Private Dichotomy in Fascist Corporativism: Discursive Strategies and Models of Legitimization
title The Public–Private Dichotomy in Fascist Corporativism: Discursive Strategies and Models of Legitimization
spellingShingle The Public–Private Dichotomy in Fascist Corporativism: Discursive Strategies and Models of Legitimization
Cau, Maurizio
corporatism; fascism; legal theory; legitimization
title_short The Public–Private Dichotomy in Fascist Corporativism: Discursive Strategies and Models of Legitimization
title_full The Public–Private Dichotomy in Fascist Corporativism: Discursive Strategies and Models of Legitimization
title_fullStr The Public–Private Dichotomy in Fascist Corporativism: Discursive Strategies and Models of Legitimization
title_full_unstemmed The Public–Private Dichotomy in Fascist Corporativism: Discursive Strategies and Models of Legitimization
title_sort The Public–Private Dichotomy in Fascist Corporativism: Discursive Strategies and Models of Legitimization
author Cau, Maurizio
author_facet Cau, Maurizio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cau, Maurizio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv corporatism; fascism; legal theory; legitimization
topic corporatism; fascism; legal theory; legitimization
description The twentieth century starts with a rediscovery of the collective dimension that legal modernity had compressed. The vivid debate that came with the fascist corporatist experiment is an interesting observatory that lets us read this process against the light. According to the major part of Italian legal culture the corporatist cultural project seems to forewarn a new framework of the connections between public and private spheres, state and society, law and economics, statism and pluralism. Corporatism, which did not intend to build a non-statual model of authority, was an answer to the need to attribute legal value and legal autonomy to economic and social actors that weren’t adequately represented in the political and normative circuit. The paper is aimed at retracing some of the discursive strategies that characterized the corporatist experiment and the different legitimization models that were proposed by legal theory in order to rebuild the dichotomy between public and private spheres.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i1.800
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/800
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i1.800
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/800
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/800
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i1.800
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/800/800
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Maurizio Cau
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Maurizio Cau
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 5, No 1 (2017): Legitimization of Private and Public Regulation: Past and Present; 26-33
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130669622755328

Registros relacionados