The structure of non-human animal cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/120833 |
Resumo: | Every scientific practice rests on implicit unrevised theoretical assumptions. Neuroscience, in particular, focuses on a very controversial object of study- the brain- and is therefore prone to tacitly embrace philosophical positions in its everyday workings. It is thus of the utmost importance to develop a critique of the structure of neuroscientific investigation so as to understand what the uncovered pillars of the field are, what pitfalls they may implicate and how we can correct them. In this paper, I gather the first critiques in animal cognitive neuroscience and hope to establish the first step in a continuous process of revision. By applying a conceptual division of neuroscience into cognitive, behavioural and neurobiological theories, I point out the main problems in articulating the three, based on actual scientific practice rather than purely theoretical reasoning. I conclude by proposing developments on behavioural theory and set an initial critique on assumptions on both cognitive and neurobiological theories. |
id |
RCAP_9c9d5492b5197860c8b3fa59854169f9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/120833 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The structure of non-human animal cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critiqueMedicina básicaBasic medicineEvery scientific practice rests on implicit unrevised theoretical assumptions. Neuroscience, in particular, focuses on a very controversial object of study- the brain- and is therefore prone to tacitly embrace philosophical positions in its everyday workings. It is thus of the utmost importance to develop a critique of the structure of neuroscientific investigation so as to understand what the uncovered pillars of the field are, what pitfalls they may implicate and how we can correct them. In this paper, I gather the first critiques in animal cognitive neuroscience and hope to establish the first step in a continuous process of revision. By applying a conceptual division of neuroscience into cognitive, behavioural and neurobiological theories, I point out the main problems in articulating the three, based on actual scientific practice rather than purely theoretical reasoning. I conclude by proposing developments on behavioural theory and set an initial critique on assumptions on both cognitive and neurobiological theories.2019-06-122019-06-12T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/120833TID:202407942engFrancisco José Correia Graça Almeidainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T13:47:33Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/120833Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:47:44.548941Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The structure of non-human animal cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique |
title |
The structure of non-human animal cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique |
spellingShingle |
The structure of non-human animal cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique Francisco José Correia Graça Almeida Medicina básica Basic medicine |
title_short |
The structure of non-human animal cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique |
title_full |
The structure of non-human animal cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique |
title_fullStr |
The structure of non-human animal cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique |
title_full_unstemmed |
The structure of non-human animal cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique |
title_sort |
The structure of non-human animal cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique |
author |
Francisco José Correia Graça Almeida |
author_facet |
Francisco José Correia Graça Almeida |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Francisco José Correia Graça Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Medicina básica Basic medicine |
topic |
Medicina básica Basic medicine |
description |
Every scientific practice rests on implicit unrevised theoretical assumptions. Neuroscience, in particular, focuses on a very controversial object of study- the brain- and is therefore prone to tacitly embrace philosophical positions in its everyday workings. It is thus of the utmost importance to develop a critique of the structure of neuroscientific investigation so as to understand what the uncovered pillars of the field are, what pitfalls they may implicate and how we can correct them. In this paper, I gather the first critiques in animal cognitive neuroscience and hope to establish the first step in a continuous process of revision. By applying a conceptual division of neuroscience into cognitive, behavioural and neurobiological theories, I point out the main problems in articulating the three, based on actual scientific practice rather than purely theoretical reasoning. I conclude by proposing developments on behavioural theory and set an initial critique on assumptions on both cognitive and neurobiological theories. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-12 2019-06-12T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/120833 TID:202407942 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/120833 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202407942 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799135795277201409 |