Mainstreaming sustainable decision-making for ecosystems: integrating ecological and socio-economic targets within a decision support system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/20194 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/9584 |
Resumo: | Ecosystem sustainable management, and the underlying decision-making process, generally requires the analysis of ecological, social and economic information, integrating both value judgements and policy goals. Since this process can be regarded as complex and tricky, natural resource management requires a well-structured and transparent decision-making process. In this regard, it is necessary to search for and implement sets of measures which can effectively solve emerging problems. Based on the assumption that decisions concerning the management of watersheds may imply trade-offs between their different functions, the intent was to test if software tools, such as MULINO, could be used to enhance multi-level governance of ecosystems. To achieve this, the DPSIR andMCAwere incorporated, to analyze and quantify the explicit trade-offs between several types of services provided by estuarine ecosystems and stakeholder objectives. The Mondego Estuary (Portugal) was used as case study. This system is under constant pressure, from both natural and anthropogenic drivers. Urban expansion and tourism were identified as having a strong impact on system development, while agriculture, although declining, had a determinant role in the system’s status. The study evaluated potential alternatives focusing on the water quality improvement goals that could be designed for the system. The MCA ranked several alternatives and pinpointed as the best option the alternative that combines buffer zones, eco-tourism enhancement, wastewater treatment plant development, the Murraceira trademark and bivalves bio-control. This analysis allowed a simplification of several management objectives; nonetheless, further tests are still required to understand the real connection between these outcomes and decision-makers. |
id |
RCAP_9dc949a4ff449ad989b0b5236b9f9496 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/9584 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Mainstreaming sustainable decision-making for ecosystems: integrating ecological and socio-economic targets within a decision support systemWater quality improvementsWFDDPSIR frameworkEcosystem servicesMULINO-MCADecision-support systemEcosystem sustainable management, and the underlying decision-making process, generally requires the analysis of ecological, social and economic information, integrating both value judgements and policy goals. Since this process can be regarded as complex and tricky, natural resource management requires a well-structured and transparent decision-making process. In this regard, it is necessary to search for and implement sets of measures which can effectively solve emerging problems. Based on the assumption that decisions concerning the management of watersheds may imply trade-offs between their different functions, the intent was to test if software tools, such as MULINO, could be used to enhance multi-level governance of ecosystems. To achieve this, the DPSIR andMCAwere incorporated, to analyze and quantify the explicit trade-offs between several types of services provided by estuarine ecosystems and stakeholder objectives. The Mondego Estuary (Portugal) was used as case study. This system is under constant pressure, from both natural and anthropogenic drivers. Urban expansion and tourism were identified as having a strong impact on system development, while agriculture, although declining, had a determinant role in the system’s status. The study evaluated potential alternatives focusing on the water quality improvement goals that could be designed for the system. The MCA ranked several alternatives and pinpointed as the best option the alternative that combines buffer zones, eco-tourism enhancement, wastewater treatment plant development, the Murraceira trademark and bivalves bio-control. This analysis allowed a simplification of several management objectives; nonetheless, further tests are still required to understand the real connection between these outcomes and decision-makers.Springer International Publishing2015-08-05T15:44:58Z2014-01-01T00:00:00Z20142015-08-05T15:43:25Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/20194http://hdl.handle.net/10071/9584eng2198-7491Pinto, R.Cunha, M. C.Roseta-Palma, C.Marques, J. C.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:31:20Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/9584Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:14:04.733644Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Mainstreaming sustainable decision-making for ecosystems: integrating ecological and socio-economic targets within a decision support system |
title |
Mainstreaming sustainable decision-making for ecosystems: integrating ecological and socio-economic targets within a decision support system |
spellingShingle |
Mainstreaming sustainable decision-making for ecosystems: integrating ecological and socio-economic targets within a decision support system Pinto, R. Water quality improvements WFD DPSIR framework Ecosystem services MULINO-MCA Decision-support system |
title_short |
Mainstreaming sustainable decision-making for ecosystems: integrating ecological and socio-economic targets within a decision support system |
title_full |
Mainstreaming sustainable decision-making for ecosystems: integrating ecological and socio-economic targets within a decision support system |
title_fullStr |
Mainstreaming sustainable decision-making for ecosystems: integrating ecological and socio-economic targets within a decision support system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mainstreaming sustainable decision-making for ecosystems: integrating ecological and socio-economic targets within a decision support system |
title_sort |
Mainstreaming sustainable decision-making for ecosystems: integrating ecological and socio-economic targets within a decision support system |
author |
Pinto, R. |
author_facet |
Pinto, R. Cunha, M. C. Roseta-Palma, C. Marques, J. C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cunha, M. C. Roseta-Palma, C. Marques, J. C. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto, R. Cunha, M. C. Roseta-Palma, C. Marques, J. C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Water quality improvements WFD DPSIR framework Ecosystem services MULINO-MCA Decision-support system |
topic |
Water quality improvements WFD DPSIR framework Ecosystem services MULINO-MCA Decision-support system |
description |
Ecosystem sustainable management, and the underlying decision-making process, generally requires the analysis of ecological, social and economic information, integrating both value judgements and policy goals. Since this process can be regarded as complex and tricky, natural resource management requires a well-structured and transparent decision-making process. In this regard, it is necessary to search for and implement sets of measures which can effectively solve emerging problems. Based on the assumption that decisions concerning the management of watersheds may imply trade-offs between their different functions, the intent was to test if software tools, such as MULINO, could be used to enhance multi-level governance of ecosystems. To achieve this, the DPSIR andMCAwere incorporated, to analyze and quantify the explicit trade-offs between several types of services provided by estuarine ecosystems and stakeholder objectives. The Mondego Estuary (Portugal) was used as case study. This system is under constant pressure, from both natural and anthropogenic drivers. Urban expansion and tourism were identified as having a strong impact on system development, while agriculture, although declining, had a determinant role in the system’s status. The study evaluated potential alternatives focusing on the water quality improvement goals that could be designed for the system. The MCA ranked several alternatives and pinpointed as the best option the alternative that combines buffer zones, eco-tourism enhancement, wastewater treatment plant development, the Murraceira trademark and bivalves bio-control. This analysis allowed a simplification of several management objectives; nonetheless, further tests are still required to understand the real connection between these outcomes and decision-makers. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z 2014 2015-08-05T15:44:58Z 2015-08-05T15:43:25Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/20194 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/9584 |
url |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/20194 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/9584 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2198-7491 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer International Publishing |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer International Publishing |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134697583804416 |