Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rast, Erich Herrmann
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/61852
Resumo: UID/FIL/00183/2013
id RCAP_9eff36f509011ffd4d4e889e3c397f9b
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/61852
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation GraphsArgument strengthConductive argumentArgumentation theoryBalance of consideration argumentArgument structureGraph theoryDecision Sciences(all)Computer Science(all)Social Sciences(all)UID/FIL/00183/2013Bipolar argument graphs represent the structure of complex pro and contra arguments for one or more standpoints. In this article, ampliative and exclusionary principles of evaluating argument strength in bipolar acyclic argumentation graphs are laid out and compared to each other. Argument chains, linked arguments, link attackers and supporters, and convergent arguments are discussed. The strength of conductive arguments is also addressed but it is argued that more work on this type of argument is needed to properly distinguish argument strength from more general value-based components of such argu- ments. The overall conclusion of the article is that there is no justifiably unique solution to the problem of argument strength outside of a particular epistemological framework.Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA)RUNRast, Erich Herrmann2019-02-27T23:16:09Z20182018-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article31application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/61852eng0860-150XPURE: 11748518https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0027info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:29:23Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/61852Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:33:42.016929Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
title Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
spellingShingle Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
Rast, Erich Herrmann
Argument strength
Conductive argument
Argumentation theory
Balance of consideration argument
Argument structure
Graph theory
Decision Sciences(all)
Computer Science(all)
Social Sciences(all)
title_short Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
title_full Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
title_fullStr Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
title_full_unstemmed Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
title_sort Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
author Rast, Erich Herrmann
author_facet Rast, Erich Herrmann
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rast, Erich Herrmann
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Argument strength
Conductive argument
Argumentation theory
Balance of consideration argument
Argument structure
Graph theory
Decision Sciences(all)
Computer Science(all)
Social Sciences(all)
topic Argument strength
Conductive argument
Argumentation theory
Balance of consideration argument
Argument structure
Graph theory
Decision Sciences(all)
Computer Science(all)
Social Sciences(all)
description UID/FIL/00183/2013
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-02-27T23:16:09Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/61852
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/61852
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0860-150X
PURE: 11748518
https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0027
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 31
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137959225589760