Opportunities for linking research to policy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7 |
Resumo: | Background: The uptake of findings from sexual and reproductive health and rights research into policy-making remains a complex and non-linear process. Different models of research utilisation and guidelines to maximise this in policy-making exist, however, challenges still remain for researchers to improve uptake of their research findings and for policy-makers to use research evidence in their work. Methods: A participatory workshop with researchers was organised in November 2017 by the Academic Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Policy (ANSER) to address this gap. ANSER is a consortium of experienced researchers, some of whom have policy-making experience, working on sexual and reproductive health and rights issues across 16 countries and 5 continents. The experiential learning cycle was used to guide the workshop discussions based on case studies and to encourage participants to focus on key lessons learned. Workshop findings were thematically analysed using specific stages from Hanney et al.'s (Health Res Policy Syst 1:2, 2003) framework on the place of policy-making in the stages of assessment of research utilisation and outcomes. Results: The workshop identified key strategies for translating research into policy, including joint agenda-setting between researchers and policy-makers, as well as building trust and partnerships with different stakeholders. These were linked to stages within Hanney et al.'s framework as opportunities for engaging with policy-makers to ensure uptake of research findings. Conclusion: The engagement of stakeholders during the research development and implementation phases, especially at strategic moments, has a positive impact on uptake of research findings. The strategies and stages described in this paper can be applied to improve utilisation of research findings into policy development and implementation globally. |
id |
RCAP_9f4a69db8b1c8b02bc81e1e52c9a7e28 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/62707 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Opportunities for linking research to policylessons learned from implementation research in sexual and reproductive health within the ANSER networkANSERglobal healthhealth policyresearchSexual and reproductive healthHealth PolicySDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingBackground: The uptake of findings from sexual and reproductive health and rights research into policy-making remains a complex and non-linear process. Different models of research utilisation and guidelines to maximise this in policy-making exist, however, challenges still remain for researchers to improve uptake of their research findings and for policy-makers to use research evidence in their work. Methods: A participatory workshop with researchers was organised in November 2017 by the Academic Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Policy (ANSER) to address this gap. ANSER is a consortium of experienced researchers, some of whom have policy-making experience, working on sexual and reproductive health and rights issues across 16 countries and 5 continents. The experiential learning cycle was used to guide the workshop discussions based on case studies and to encourage participants to focus on key lessons learned. Workshop findings were thematically analysed using specific stages from Hanney et al.'s (Health Res Policy Syst 1:2, 2003) framework on the place of policy-making in the stages of assessment of research utilisation and outcomes. Results: The workshop identified key strategies for translating research into policy, including joint agenda-setting between researchers and policy-makers, as well as building trust and partnerships with different stakeholders. These were linked to stages within Hanney et al.'s framework as opportunities for engaging with policy-makers to ensure uptake of research findings. Conclusion: The engagement of stakeholders during the research development and implementation phases, especially at strategic moments, has a positive impact on uptake of research findings. The strategies and stages described in this paper can be applied to improve utilisation of research findings into policy development and implementation globally.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)RUNOgbe, EmilomoVan Braeckel, DirkTemmerman, MarleenLarsson, Elin C.Keygnaert, InesDe Los Reyes Aragón, WilsonCheng, FengLazdane, GuntaCooper, DianeShamu, SimukaiGichangi, PeterDias, SóniaBarrett, HazelNobels, AnnePei, KaiyanGalle, AnnaEsho, TammaryKnight, LuciaTabana, HananiDegomme, Olivier2019-03-08T23:18:03Z2018-12-172018-12-17T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7eng1478-4505PURE: 11928363http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058660790&partnerID=8YFLogxKhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:29:39Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/62707Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:33:47.911966Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Opportunities for linking research to policy lessons learned from implementation research in sexual and reproductive health within the ANSER network |
title |
Opportunities for linking research to policy |
spellingShingle |
Opportunities for linking research to policy Ogbe, Emilomo ANSER global health health policy research Sexual and reproductive health Health Policy SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being |
title_short |
Opportunities for linking research to policy |
title_full |
Opportunities for linking research to policy |
title_fullStr |
Opportunities for linking research to policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Opportunities for linking research to policy |
title_sort |
Opportunities for linking research to policy |
author |
Ogbe, Emilomo |
author_facet |
Ogbe, Emilomo Van Braeckel, Dirk Temmerman, Marleen Larsson, Elin C. Keygnaert, Ines De Los Reyes Aragón, Wilson Cheng, Feng Lazdane, Gunta Cooper, Diane Shamu, Simukai Gichangi, Peter Dias, Sónia Barrett, Hazel Nobels, Anne Pei, Kaiyan Galle, Anna Esho, Tammary Knight, Lucia Tabana, Hanani Degomme, Olivier |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Van Braeckel, Dirk Temmerman, Marleen Larsson, Elin C. Keygnaert, Ines De Los Reyes Aragón, Wilson Cheng, Feng Lazdane, Gunta Cooper, Diane Shamu, Simukai Gichangi, Peter Dias, Sónia Barrett, Hazel Nobels, Anne Pei, Kaiyan Galle, Anna Esho, Tammary Knight, Lucia Tabana, Hanani Degomme, Olivier |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP) Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC) RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ogbe, Emilomo Van Braeckel, Dirk Temmerman, Marleen Larsson, Elin C. Keygnaert, Ines De Los Reyes Aragón, Wilson Cheng, Feng Lazdane, Gunta Cooper, Diane Shamu, Simukai Gichangi, Peter Dias, Sónia Barrett, Hazel Nobels, Anne Pei, Kaiyan Galle, Anna Esho, Tammary Knight, Lucia Tabana, Hanani Degomme, Olivier |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ANSER global health health policy research Sexual and reproductive health Health Policy SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being |
topic |
ANSER global health health policy research Sexual and reproductive health Health Policy SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being |
description |
Background: The uptake of findings from sexual and reproductive health and rights research into policy-making remains a complex and non-linear process. Different models of research utilisation and guidelines to maximise this in policy-making exist, however, challenges still remain for researchers to improve uptake of their research findings and for policy-makers to use research evidence in their work. Methods: A participatory workshop with researchers was organised in November 2017 by the Academic Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Policy (ANSER) to address this gap. ANSER is a consortium of experienced researchers, some of whom have policy-making experience, working on sexual and reproductive health and rights issues across 16 countries and 5 continents. The experiential learning cycle was used to guide the workshop discussions based on case studies and to encourage participants to focus on key lessons learned. Workshop findings were thematically analysed using specific stages from Hanney et al.'s (Health Res Policy Syst 1:2, 2003) framework on the place of policy-making in the stages of assessment of research utilisation and outcomes. Results: The workshop identified key strategies for translating research into policy, including joint agenda-setting between researchers and policy-makers, as well as building trust and partnerships with different stakeholders. These were linked to stages within Hanney et al.'s framework as opportunities for engaging with policy-makers to ensure uptake of research findings. Conclusion: The engagement of stakeholders during the research development and implementation phases, especially at strategic moments, has a positive impact on uptake of research findings. The strategies and stages described in this paper can be applied to improve utilisation of research findings into policy development and implementation globally. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-17 2018-12-17T00:00:00Z 2019-03-08T23:18:03Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1478-4505 PURE: 11928363 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058660790&partnerID=8YFLogxK https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137960017264640 |