Opportunities for linking research to policy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ogbe, Emilomo
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Van Braeckel, Dirk, Temmerman, Marleen, Larsson, Elin C., Keygnaert, Ines, De Los Reyes Aragón, Wilson, Cheng, Feng, Lazdane, Gunta, Cooper, Diane, Shamu, Simukai, Gichangi, Peter, Dias, Sónia, Barrett, Hazel, Nobels, Anne, Pei, Kaiyan, Galle, Anna, Esho, Tammary, Knight, Lucia, Tabana, Hanani, Degomme, Olivier
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7
Resumo: Background: The uptake of findings from sexual and reproductive health and rights research into policy-making remains a complex and non-linear process. Different models of research utilisation and guidelines to maximise this in policy-making exist, however, challenges still remain for researchers to improve uptake of their research findings and for policy-makers to use research evidence in their work. Methods: A participatory workshop with researchers was organised in November 2017 by the Academic Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Policy (ANSER) to address this gap. ANSER is a consortium of experienced researchers, some of whom have policy-making experience, working on sexual and reproductive health and rights issues across 16 countries and 5 continents. The experiential learning cycle was used to guide the workshop discussions based on case studies and to encourage participants to focus on key lessons learned. Workshop findings were thematically analysed using specific stages from Hanney et al.'s (Health Res Policy Syst 1:2, 2003) framework on the place of policy-making in the stages of assessment of research utilisation and outcomes. Results: The workshop identified key strategies for translating research into policy, including joint agenda-setting between researchers and policy-makers, as well as building trust and partnerships with different stakeholders. These were linked to stages within Hanney et al.'s framework as opportunities for engaging with policy-makers to ensure uptake of research findings. Conclusion: The engagement of stakeholders during the research development and implementation phases, especially at strategic moments, has a positive impact on uptake of research findings. The strategies and stages described in this paper can be applied to improve utilisation of research findings into policy development and implementation globally.
id RCAP_9f4a69db8b1c8b02bc81e1e52c9a7e28
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/62707
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Opportunities for linking research to policylessons learned from implementation research in sexual and reproductive health within the ANSER networkANSERglobal healthhealth policyresearchSexual and reproductive healthHealth PolicySDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingBackground: The uptake of findings from sexual and reproductive health and rights research into policy-making remains a complex and non-linear process. Different models of research utilisation and guidelines to maximise this in policy-making exist, however, challenges still remain for researchers to improve uptake of their research findings and for policy-makers to use research evidence in their work. Methods: A participatory workshop with researchers was organised in November 2017 by the Academic Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Policy (ANSER) to address this gap. ANSER is a consortium of experienced researchers, some of whom have policy-making experience, working on sexual and reproductive health and rights issues across 16 countries and 5 continents. The experiential learning cycle was used to guide the workshop discussions based on case studies and to encourage participants to focus on key lessons learned. Workshop findings were thematically analysed using specific stages from Hanney et al.'s (Health Res Policy Syst 1:2, 2003) framework on the place of policy-making in the stages of assessment of research utilisation and outcomes. Results: The workshop identified key strategies for translating research into policy, including joint agenda-setting between researchers and policy-makers, as well as building trust and partnerships with different stakeholders. These were linked to stages within Hanney et al.'s framework as opportunities for engaging with policy-makers to ensure uptake of research findings. Conclusion: The engagement of stakeholders during the research development and implementation phases, especially at strategic moments, has a positive impact on uptake of research findings. The strategies and stages described in this paper can be applied to improve utilisation of research findings into policy development and implementation globally.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)RUNOgbe, EmilomoVan Braeckel, DirkTemmerman, MarleenLarsson, Elin C.Keygnaert, InesDe Los Reyes Aragón, WilsonCheng, FengLazdane, GuntaCooper, DianeShamu, SimukaiGichangi, PeterDias, SóniaBarrett, HazelNobels, AnnePei, KaiyanGalle, AnnaEsho, TammaryKnight, LuciaTabana, HananiDegomme, Olivier2019-03-08T23:18:03Z2018-12-172018-12-17T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7eng1478-4505PURE: 11928363http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058660790&partnerID=8YFLogxKhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:29:39Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/62707Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:33:47.911966Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Opportunities for linking research to policy
lessons learned from implementation research in sexual and reproductive health within the ANSER network
title Opportunities for linking research to policy
spellingShingle Opportunities for linking research to policy
Ogbe, Emilomo
ANSER
global health
health policy
research
Sexual and reproductive health
Health Policy
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
title_short Opportunities for linking research to policy
title_full Opportunities for linking research to policy
title_fullStr Opportunities for linking research to policy
title_full_unstemmed Opportunities for linking research to policy
title_sort Opportunities for linking research to policy
author Ogbe, Emilomo
author_facet Ogbe, Emilomo
Van Braeckel, Dirk
Temmerman, Marleen
Larsson, Elin C.
Keygnaert, Ines
De Los Reyes Aragón, Wilson
Cheng, Feng
Lazdane, Gunta
Cooper, Diane
Shamu, Simukai
Gichangi, Peter
Dias, Sónia
Barrett, Hazel
Nobels, Anne
Pei, Kaiyan
Galle, Anna
Esho, Tammary
Knight, Lucia
Tabana, Hanani
Degomme, Olivier
author_role author
author2 Van Braeckel, Dirk
Temmerman, Marleen
Larsson, Elin C.
Keygnaert, Ines
De Los Reyes Aragón, Wilson
Cheng, Feng
Lazdane, Gunta
Cooper, Diane
Shamu, Simukai
Gichangi, Peter
Dias, Sónia
Barrett, Hazel
Nobels, Anne
Pei, Kaiyan
Galle, Anna
Esho, Tammary
Knight, Lucia
Tabana, Hanani
Degomme, Olivier
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)
Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ogbe, Emilomo
Van Braeckel, Dirk
Temmerman, Marleen
Larsson, Elin C.
Keygnaert, Ines
De Los Reyes Aragón, Wilson
Cheng, Feng
Lazdane, Gunta
Cooper, Diane
Shamu, Simukai
Gichangi, Peter
Dias, Sónia
Barrett, Hazel
Nobels, Anne
Pei, Kaiyan
Galle, Anna
Esho, Tammary
Knight, Lucia
Tabana, Hanani
Degomme, Olivier
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ANSER
global health
health policy
research
Sexual and reproductive health
Health Policy
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
topic ANSER
global health
health policy
research
Sexual and reproductive health
Health Policy
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
description Background: The uptake of findings from sexual and reproductive health and rights research into policy-making remains a complex and non-linear process. Different models of research utilisation and guidelines to maximise this in policy-making exist, however, challenges still remain for researchers to improve uptake of their research findings and for policy-makers to use research evidence in their work. Methods: A participatory workshop with researchers was organised in November 2017 by the Academic Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Policy (ANSER) to address this gap. ANSER is a consortium of experienced researchers, some of whom have policy-making experience, working on sexual and reproductive health and rights issues across 16 countries and 5 continents. The experiential learning cycle was used to guide the workshop discussions based on case studies and to encourage participants to focus on key lessons learned. Workshop findings were thematically analysed using specific stages from Hanney et al.'s (Health Res Policy Syst 1:2, 2003) framework on the place of policy-making in the stages of assessment of research utilisation and outcomes. Results: The workshop identified key strategies for translating research into policy, including joint agenda-setting between researchers and policy-makers, as well as building trust and partnerships with different stakeholders. These were linked to stages within Hanney et al.'s framework as opportunities for engaging with policy-makers to ensure uptake of research findings. Conclusion: The engagement of stakeholders during the research development and implementation phases, especially at strategic moments, has a positive impact on uptake of research findings. The strategies and stages described in this paper can be applied to improve utilisation of research findings into policy development and implementation globally.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-17
2018-12-17T00:00:00Z
2019-03-08T23:18:03Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1478-4505
PURE: 11928363
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058660790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137960017264640