Promoting youthfulness: the construction of persuasive discourse and argumentation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tuna, Sandra
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/6568
Resumo: Advertising discourse is persuasive by its very nature. Essentially goal-oriented, it is constructed so as to propose a pre-determined view of the world that suits its purposes, by means of a well-defined argumentative pathway that leads up to the proposed most (desired) suitable option. As a discourse that enjoys unparalleled freedom – both in terms of content and form – it has long moved beyond a clear-cut argumentative process based on hard sell versus soft sell, or tickle versus reason approaches (Cook, 2001:15). In their attempts to overcome boredom and scepticism on the part of an ad-literate audience, advertisers resort to different forms of argumentative reasoning: deduction, opposition, analogy or calculation, as proposed by Charaudeau (2008). In addition, as multi-modal texts, they make the most of the different modes available – pictures, text, sound, moving pictures – to build their argument. As claimed by Ripley (2008), an ad is an argument, thus, whichever claims or statements it makes, we are aware of – and suspicious about – its persuasive intent, though we often tend to go along with the worldviews it suggests. In spite of common accusations of stereotyping, segregating, imposing models of beauty, lifestyle among others, overlooking (and blurring) national idiosyncrasies, advertising has somehow managed to build rather convincing arguments that seemingly consider such criticism. In this study, we will look into cosmetics adverts that explicitly and implicitly build their arguments in ways that almost always encourage identical proposals of youthfulness, despite their apparent different claims and argumentative routes and despite their apparent concern for incorporating socially (or politically) correct positions.
id RCAP_9f81ccb9306501aac78e3514f475fe39
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/6568
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Promoting youthfulness: the construction of persuasive discourse and argumentationA promoção de jovialidade: a construção de um discurso e argumentação persuasivosAdvertising discourse is persuasive by its very nature. Essentially goal-oriented, it is constructed so as to propose a pre-determined view of the world that suits its purposes, by means of a well-defined argumentative pathway that leads up to the proposed most (desired) suitable option. As a discourse that enjoys unparalleled freedom – both in terms of content and form – it has long moved beyond a clear-cut argumentative process based on hard sell versus soft sell, or tickle versus reason approaches (Cook, 2001:15). In their attempts to overcome boredom and scepticism on the part of an ad-literate audience, advertisers resort to different forms of argumentative reasoning: deduction, opposition, analogy or calculation, as proposed by Charaudeau (2008). In addition, as multi-modal texts, they make the most of the different modes available – pictures, text, sound, moving pictures – to build their argument. As claimed by Ripley (2008), an ad is an argument, thus, whichever claims or statements it makes, we are aware of – and suspicious about – its persuasive intent, though we often tend to go along with the worldviews it suggests. In spite of common accusations of stereotyping, segregating, imposing models of beauty, lifestyle among others, overlooking (and blurring) national idiosyncrasies, advertising has somehow managed to build rather convincing arguments that seemingly consider such criticism. In this study, we will look into cosmetics adverts that explicitly and implicitly build their arguments in ways that almost always encourage identical proposals of youthfulness, despite their apparent different claims and argumentative routes and despite their apparent concern for incorporating socially (or politically) correct positions.Advertising discourse is persuasive by its very nature. Essentially goal-oriented, it is constructed so as to propose a pre-determined view of the world that suits its purposes, by means of a well-defined argumentative pathway that leads up to the proposed most (desired) suitable option. As a discourse that enjoys unparalleled freedom – both in terms of content and form – it has long moved beyond a clear-cut argumentative process based on hard sell versus soft sell, or tickle versus reason approaches (Cook, 2001:15). In their attempts to overcome boredom and scepticism on the part of an ad-literate audience, advertisers resort to different forms of argumentative reasoning: deduction, opposition, analogy or calculation, as proposed by Charaudeau (2008). In addition, as multi-modal texts, they make the most of the different modes available – pictures, text, sound, moving pictures – to build their argument. As claimed by Ripley (2008), an ad is an argument, thus, whichever claims or statements it makes, we are aware of – and suspicious about – its persuasive intent, though we often tend to go along with the worldviews it suggests. In spite of common accusations of stereotyping, segregating, imposing models of beauty, lifestyle among others, overlooking (and blurring) national idiosyncrasies, advertising has somehow managed to build rather convincing arguments that seemingly consider such criticism. In this study, we will look into cosmetics adverts that explicitly and implicitly build their arguments in ways that almost always encourage identical proposals of youthfulness, despite their apparent different claims and argumentative routes and despite their apparent concern for incorporating socially (or politically) correct positions.Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso2019-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/6568Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; N.º 8 (2019): REDIS: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; 200-2162183-395810.21747/21833958/red8reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/6568https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/6568/6122Direitos de Autor (c) 2020 Redis: Revista de Estudos do discursoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTuna, Sandra2023-11-24T11:15:40Zoai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/6568Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:29:35.443464Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Promoting youthfulness: the construction of persuasive discourse and argumentation
A promoção de jovialidade: a construção de um discurso e argumentação persuasivos
title Promoting youthfulness: the construction of persuasive discourse and argumentation
spellingShingle Promoting youthfulness: the construction of persuasive discourse and argumentation
Tuna, Sandra
title_short Promoting youthfulness: the construction of persuasive discourse and argumentation
title_full Promoting youthfulness: the construction of persuasive discourse and argumentation
title_fullStr Promoting youthfulness: the construction of persuasive discourse and argumentation
title_full_unstemmed Promoting youthfulness: the construction of persuasive discourse and argumentation
title_sort Promoting youthfulness: the construction of persuasive discourse and argumentation
author Tuna, Sandra
author_facet Tuna, Sandra
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tuna, Sandra
description Advertising discourse is persuasive by its very nature. Essentially goal-oriented, it is constructed so as to propose a pre-determined view of the world that suits its purposes, by means of a well-defined argumentative pathway that leads up to the proposed most (desired) suitable option. As a discourse that enjoys unparalleled freedom – both in terms of content and form – it has long moved beyond a clear-cut argumentative process based on hard sell versus soft sell, or tickle versus reason approaches (Cook, 2001:15). In their attempts to overcome boredom and scepticism on the part of an ad-literate audience, advertisers resort to different forms of argumentative reasoning: deduction, opposition, analogy or calculation, as proposed by Charaudeau (2008). In addition, as multi-modal texts, they make the most of the different modes available – pictures, text, sound, moving pictures – to build their argument. As claimed by Ripley (2008), an ad is an argument, thus, whichever claims or statements it makes, we are aware of – and suspicious about – its persuasive intent, though we often tend to go along with the worldviews it suggests. In spite of common accusations of stereotyping, segregating, imposing models of beauty, lifestyle among others, overlooking (and blurring) national idiosyncrasies, advertising has somehow managed to build rather convincing arguments that seemingly consider such criticism. In this study, we will look into cosmetics adverts that explicitly and implicitly build their arguments in ways that almost always encourage identical proposals of youthfulness, despite their apparent different claims and argumentative routes and despite their apparent concern for incorporating socially (or politically) correct positions.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/6568
url https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/6568
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/6568
https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/re/article/view/6568/6122
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2020 Redis: Revista de Estudos do discurso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2020 Redis: Revista de Estudos do discurso
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Redis: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; N.º 8 (2019): REDIS: Revista de Estudos do Discurso; 200-216
2183-3958
10.21747/21833958/red8
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130753182728192