Reciprocity or equity?analyzing the drivers of punishment and reward in a public good game. Evidence from rural Rwanda.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schenker, Xaver
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/32554
Resumo: This paper uses Public Good Games conducted in rural Rwanda to analyze the impact of rewards and penalties on the level of cooperation. Furthermore, this work elaborates whether the decisions to punish and reward are triggered equally. The results provide evidence, that the possibilities of rewarding and punishing a partner successfully increase cooperation levels. Moreover, evidence suggests, that reward and punishment decisions are based on di↵erent motivations. Sanctioning shows signs of being motivated by outcome preferences and perceived intentionality of a participant’s action. Results for reward suggest, that reciprocity based on intentionality and kindness of an action is the significant driver.
id RCAP_9fbdaca89c3b18d2ab0269b15c118614
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/32554
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Reciprocity or equity?analyzing the drivers of punishment and reward in a public good game. Evidence from rural Rwanda.Public good gamesRwandaField experimentInequity aversionReciprocityPunishmentRewardDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoThis paper uses Public Good Games conducted in rural Rwanda to analyze the impact of rewards and penalties on the level of cooperation. Furthermore, this work elaborates whether the decisions to punish and reward are triggered equally. The results provide evidence, that the possibilities of rewarding and punishing a partner successfully increase cooperation levels. Moreover, evidence suggests, that reward and punishment decisions are based on di↵erent motivations. Sanctioning shows signs of being motivated by outcome preferences and perceived intentionality of a participant’s action. Results for reward suggest, that reciprocity based on intentionality and kindness of an action is the significant driver.Coutts, AlexanderRUNSchenker, Xaver2018-03-15T15:53:56Z2018-01-202018-01-20T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/32554TID:201861275enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:18:07Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/32554Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:29:53.961378Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reciprocity or equity?analyzing the drivers of punishment and reward in a public good game. Evidence from rural Rwanda.
title Reciprocity or equity?analyzing the drivers of punishment and reward in a public good game. Evidence from rural Rwanda.
spellingShingle Reciprocity or equity?analyzing the drivers of punishment and reward in a public good game. Evidence from rural Rwanda.
Schenker, Xaver
Public good games
Rwanda
Field experiment
Inequity aversion
Reciprocity
Punishment
Reward
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short Reciprocity or equity?analyzing the drivers of punishment and reward in a public good game. Evidence from rural Rwanda.
title_full Reciprocity or equity?analyzing the drivers of punishment and reward in a public good game. Evidence from rural Rwanda.
title_fullStr Reciprocity or equity?analyzing the drivers of punishment and reward in a public good game. Evidence from rural Rwanda.
title_full_unstemmed Reciprocity or equity?analyzing the drivers of punishment and reward in a public good game. Evidence from rural Rwanda.
title_sort Reciprocity or equity?analyzing the drivers of punishment and reward in a public good game. Evidence from rural Rwanda.
author Schenker, Xaver
author_facet Schenker, Xaver
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Coutts, Alexander
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schenker, Xaver
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Public good games
Rwanda
Field experiment
Inequity aversion
Reciprocity
Punishment
Reward
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Public good games
Rwanda
Field experiment
Inequity aversion
Reciprocity
Punishment
Reward
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description This paper uses Public Good Games conducted in rural Rwanda to analyze the impact of rewards and penalties on the level of cooperation. Furthermore, this work elaborates whether the decisions to punish and reward are triggered equally. The results provide evidence, that the possibilities of rewarding and punishing a partner successfully increase cooperation levels. Moreover, evidence suggests, that reward and punishment decisions are based on di↵erent motivations. Sanctioning shows signs of being motivated by outcome preferences and perceived intentionality of a participant’s action. Results for reward suggest, that reciprocity based on intentionality and kindness of an action is the significant driver.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-15T15:53:56Z
2018-01-20
2018-01-20T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/32554
TID:201861275
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/32554
identifier_str_mv TID:201861275
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137923911647232