The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11816/4342 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The sinus lift surgery with simultaneous implant placement (SLWSIP) is in constant evolution. The use of bone grafts in the SLWSIP surgery has long been studied. However, there is now a new scientific technique known as the graftless technique whith good outcomes. Objectives: The aim of the study is to assess the interest and efficiency of the biomaterials used in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement. We want to set by side to side the graftless technique with bones substitutes one in order to compare their efficacity and to identify which one could be the preferable technique to increase the retention of the implant. Material and Methods: A bibliographic search was conducted in the PUBMED database, between the years 2013 and 2023, in English, on human beings, using the following key words: (sinus lift) AND (implant placement) AND (bone substitute). Results: The different search identified 590 studies, of which 38 were considered relevant to this study. Discussion: Atrophy of the posterior maxilla can be successfully rehabilitated using the the SLWSIP with the graftless technique, this technique could offer patients a less invasive surgery compared to traditional surgery, implying a number of advantages such as: less risk of infection, less risk of morbidity, it is cheaper and thus better accepted by the patient. Conclusion: The results of this articles are very promising but its use is still recent in dental surgeries, further studies are needed to improve this surgery technique. |
id |
RCAP_9fe0bd7e1fd2d81c9088eb1e6d1ad052 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.cespu.pt:20.500.11816/4342 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placementSinus lift elevationSimultaneous implant placementBone substituteMaxillary sinus floor augmentationGraft biomaterialsBone graftingIntroduction: The sinus lift surgery with simultaneous implant placement (SLWSIP) is in constant evolution. The use of bone grafts in the SLWSIP surgery has long been studied. However, there is now a new scientific technique known as the graftless technique whith good outcomes. Objectives: The aim of the study is to assess the interest and efficiency of the biomaterials used in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement. We want to set by side to side the graftless technique with bones substitutes one in order to compare their efficacity and to identify which one could be the preferable technique to increase the retention of the implant. Material and Methods: A bibliographic search was conducted in the PUBMED database, between the years 2013 and 2023, in English, on human beings, using the following key words: (sinus lift) AND (implant placement) AND (bone substitute). Results: The different search identified 590 studies, of which 38 were considered relevant to this study. Discussion: Atrophy of the posterior maxilla can be successfully rehabilitated using the the SLWSIP with the graftless technique, this technique could offer patients a less invasive surgery compared to traditional surgery, implying a number of advantages such as: less risk of infection, less risk of morbidity, it is cheaper and thus better accepted by the patient. Conclusion: The results of this articles are very promising but its use is still recent in dental surgeries, further studies are needed to improve this surgery technique.Introdução: A cirurgia de elevação do seio maxilar e colocação de implante em simultâneo está em constante evolução. O uso de enxertos ósseo na elevação do seio maxilar já está há muito estudada. Contudo há agora uma nova corrente cientifica onde existem bons resultados com a técnica graftless. Objetivos: Determinar a técnica de eleição entre a técnica graftless sem enxerto ósseo e as técnicas com enxertos ósseos como osso autólogo, Bio-Oss®, ou com biomateriais como Platelet-Rich-Fibrin (PRF), Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate (B-TCP), alloplastic dental putty para a elevação do seio maxilar e colocação de implante em simultâneo. Materiais e Métodos: Pesquisa na base de PUBMED, entre 2013 e 2023, em Inglês, com estudos feitos sobre humanos, com as seguintes palavras-chaves: (sinus lift) AND (implant placement) AND (bone substitute) Resultados: Nas pesquisas foram identificados 590 estudos, dos quais 38 foram considerados relevantes para este estudo. Discussão: A atrofia do sector posterior da maxila pode ser reabilitada com sucesso usando a técnica de elevação do seio maxilar e colocação de implante em simultâneo sem usar enxertos, essa técnica poderia oferecer aos pacientes uma cirurgia menos invasiva comparada à cirurgia tradicional, implicando uma série de vantagens como: menos risco de infeção, menos risco de morbilidade, mais barato e melhor aceite pelo paciente. Conclusão: Os resultados destes artigos são muito promissores, mas a utilização da técnica graftless tem uma utilização recente nas cirurgias dentarias, e são necessários estudos futuros para melhorar esta técnica cirúrgica.2023-11-21T16:12:56Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Z2023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11816/4342TID:203358678engBenani-Othmani, Iris Sarah Fernanda Malikainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-30T03:33:47Zoai:repositorio.cespu.pt:20.500.11816/4342Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:40:07.759230Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement |
title |
The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement |
spellingShingle |
The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement Benani-Othmani, Iris Sarah Fernanda Malika Sinus lift elevation Simultaneous implant placement Bone substitute Maxillary sinus floor augmentation Graft biomaterials Bone grafting |
title_short |
The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement |
title_full |
The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement |
title_fullStr |
The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement |
title_full_unstemmed |
The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement |
title_sort |
The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement |
author |
Benani-Othmani, Iris Sarah Fernanda Malika |
author_facet |
Benani-Othmani, Iris Sarah Fernanda Malika |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Benani-Othmani, Iris Sarah Fernanda Malika |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sinus lift elevation Simultaneous implant placement Bone substitute Maxillary sinus floor augmentation Graft biomaterials Bone grafting |
topic |
Sinus lift elevation Simultaneous implant placement Bone substitute Maxillary sinus floor augmentation Graft biomaterials Bone grafting |
description |
Introduction: The sinus lift surgery with simultaneous implant placement (SLWSIP) is in constant evolution. The use of bone grafts in the SLWSIP surgery has long been studied. However, there is now a new scientific technique known as the graftless technique whith good outcomes. Objectives: The aim of the study is to assess the interest and efficiency of the biomaterials used in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement. We want to set by side to side the graftless technique with bones substitutes one in order to compare their efficacity and to identify which one could be the preferable technique to increase the retention of the implant. Material and Methods: A bibliographic search was conducted in the PUBMED database, between the years 2013 and 2023, in English, on human beings, using the following key words: (sinus lift) AND (implant placement) AND (bone substitute). Results: The different search identified 590 studies, of which 38 were considered relevant to this study. Discussion: Atrophy of the posterior maxilla can be successfully rehabilitated using the the SLWSIP with the graftless technique, this technique could offer patients a less invasive surgery compared to traditional surgery, implying a number of advantages such as: less risk of infection, less risk of morbidity, it is cheaper and thus better accepted by the patient. Conclusion: The results of this articles are very promising but its use is still recent in dental surgeries, further studies are needed to improve this surgery technique. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-21T16:12:56Z 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z 2023 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11816/4342 TID:203358678 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11816/4342 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:203358678 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136306977046528 |