The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Benani-Othmani, Iris Sarah Fernanda Malika
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11816/4342
Resumo: Introduction: The sinus lift surgery with simultaneous implant placement (SLWSIP) is in constant evolution. The use of bone grafts in the SLWSIP surgery has long been studied. However, there is now a new scientific technique known as the graftless technique whith good outcomes. Objectives: The aim of the study is to assess the interest and efficiency of the biomaterials used in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement. We want to set by side to side the graftless technique with bones substitutes one in order to compare their efficacity and to identify which one could be the preferable technique to increase the retention of the implant. Material and Methods: A bibliographic search was conducted in the PUBMED database, between the years 2013 and 2023, in English, on human beings, using the following key words: (sinus lift) AND (implant placement) AND (bone substitute). Results: The different search identified 590 studies, of which 38 were considered relevant to this study. Discussion: Atrophy of the posterior maxilla can be successfully rehabilitated using the the SLWSIP with the graftless technique, this technique could offer patients a less invasive surgery compared to traditional surgery, implying a number of advantages such as: less risk of infection, less risk of morbidity, it is cheaper and thus better accepted by the patient. Conclusion: The results of this articles are very promising but its use is still recent in dental surgeries, further studies are needed to improve this surgery technique.
id RCAP_9fe0bd7e1fd2d81c9088eb1e6d1ad052
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cespu.pt:20.500.11816/4342
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placementSinus lift elevationSimultaneous implant placementBone substituteMaxillary sinus floor augmentationGraft biomaterialsBone graftingIntroduction: The sinus lift surgery with simultaneous implant placement (SLWSIP) is in constant evolution. The use of bone grafts in the SLWSIP surgery has long been studied. However, there is now a new scientific technique known as the graftless technique whith good outcomes. Objectives: The aim of the study is to assess the interest and efficiency of the biomaterials used in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement. We want to set by side to side the graftless technique with bones substitutes one in order to compare their efficacity and to identify which one could be the preferable technique to increase the retention of the implant. Material and Methods: A bibliographic search was conducted in the PUBMED database, between the years 2013 and 2023, in English, on human beings, using the following key words: (sinus lift) AND (implant placement) AND (bone substitute). Results: The different search identified 590 studies, of which 38 were considered relevant to this study. Discussion: Atrophy of the posterior maxilla can be successfully rehabilitated using the the SLWSIP with the graftless technique, this technique could offer patients a less invasive surgery compared to traditional surgery, implying a number of advantages such as: less risk of infection, less risk of morbidity, it is cheaper and thus better accepted by the patient. Conclusion: The results of this articles are very promising but its use is still recent in dental surgeries, further studies are needed to improve this surgery technique.Introdução: A cirurgia de elevação do seio maxilar e colocação de implante em simultâneo está em constante evolução. O uso de enxertos ósseo na elevação do seio maxilar já está há muito estudada. Contudo há agora uma nova corrente cientifica onde existem bons resultados com a técnica graftless. Objetivos: Determinar a técnica de eleição entre a técnica graftless sem enxerto ósseo e as técnicas com enxertos ósseos como osso autólogo, Bio-Oss®, ou com biomateriais como Platelet-Rich-Fibrin (PRF), Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate (B-TCP), alloplastic dental putty para a elevação do seio maxilar e colocação de implante em simultâneo. Materiais e Métodos: Pesquisa na base de PUBMED, entre 2013 e 2023, em Inglês, com estudos feitos sobre humanos, com as seguintes palavras-chaves: (sinus lift) AND (implant placement) AND (bone substitute) Resultados: Nas pesquisas foram identificados 590 estudos, dos quais 38 foram considerados relevantes para este estudo. Discussão: A atrofia do sector posterior da maxila pode ser reabilitada com sucesso usando a técnica de elevação do seio maxilar e colocação de implante em simultâneo sem usar enxertos, essa técnica poderia oferecer aos pacientes uma cirurgia menos invasiva comparada à cirurgia tradicional, implicando uma série de vantagens como: menos risco de infeção, menos risco de morbilidade, mais barato e melhor aceite pelo paciente. Conclusão: Os resultados destes artigos são muito promissores, mas a utilização da técnica graftless tem uma utilização recente nas cirurgias dentarias, e são necessários estudos futuros para melhorar esta técnica cirúrgica.2023-11-21T16:12:56Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Z2023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11816/4342TID:203358678engBenani-Othmani, Iris Sarah Fernanda Malikainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-30T03:33:47Zoai:repositorio.cespu.pt:20.500.11816/4342Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:40:07.759230Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement
title The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement
spellingShingle The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement
Benani-Othmani, Iris Sarah Fernanda Malika
Sinus lift elevation
Simultaneous implant placement
Bone substitute
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation
Graft biomaterials
Bone grafting
title_short The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement
title_full The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement
title_fullStr The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement
title_full_unstemmed The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement
title_sort The comparison between conventional grafting materials and the graftless technique in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement
author Benani-Othmani, Iris Sarah Fernanda Malika
author_facet Benani-Othmani, Iris Sarah Fernanda Malika
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Benani-Othmani, Iris Sarah Fernanda Malika
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sinus lift elevation
Simultaneous implant placement
Bone substitute
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation
Graft biomaterials
Bone grafting
topic Sinus lift elevation
Simultaneous implant placement
Bone substitute
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation
Graft biomaterials
Bone grafting
description Introduction: The sinus lift surgery with simultaneous implant placement (SLWSIP) is in constant evolution. The use of bone grafts in the SLWSIP surgery has long been studied. However, there is now a new scientific technique known as the graftless technique whith good outcomes. Objectives: The aim of the study is to assess the interest and efficiency of the biomaterials used in the sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement. We want to set by side to side the graftless technique with bones substitutes one in order to compare their efficacity and to identify which one could be the preferable technique to increase the retention of the implant. Material and Methods: A bibliographic search was conducted in the PUBMED database, between the years 2013 and 2023, in English, on human beings, using the following key words: (sinus lift) AND (implant placement) AND (bone substitute). Results: The different search identified 590 studies, of which 38 were considered relevant to this study. Discussion: Atrophy of the posterior maxilla can be successfully rehabilitated using the the SLWSIP with the graftless technique, this technique could offer patients a less invasive surgery compared to traditional surgery, implying a number of advantages such as: less risk of infection, less risk of morbidity, it is cheaper and thus better accepted by the patient. Conclusion: The results of this articles are very promising but its use is still recent in dental surgeries, further studies are needed to improve this surgery technique.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-21T16:12:56Z
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
2023
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11816/4342
TID:203358678
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11816/4342
identifier_str_mv TID:203358678
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136306977046528