Computerised respiratory sounds in infants with lower respiratory tract infections : a comparative study

• Autor(a) principal: Regêncio, Maria Manuel Almeida
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/14582
• topic: Fisioterapia; Aparelho respiratório - Infecções - Crianças; Diagnóstico

Background: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are the main cause of health burden in the first years of age. To enhance the diagnosis and monitoring of infants with LRTI, researchers have been trying to use the large advantages of conventional auscultation. Computerised respiratory sound analysis (CORSA) is a simple method to detect and characterise Normal Respiratory Sounds (NRS) and Adventitious Respiratory Sounds (ARS). However, if this measure is to be used in the paediatric population, reference values have to be established first. Aim: To compare and characterise NRS and ARS in healthy infants and infants with LRTI. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive-comparative study was conducted in three institutions. Infants were diagnosed by the paediatrician as presenting or not presenting an LRTI, healthy volunteers were recruited from the institutions. Socio-demographic, anthropometric and cardio-respiratory parameters were collected. Respiratory sounds were recorded with a digital stethoscope. Frequency at maximum intensity (Fmax), maximum intensity (Imax) and mean intensity (Imean) over the whole frequency range were collected to characterise NRS. Location, mean number, type, duration and frequency were collected to characterise ARS. All analysis was performed per breathing phase (i.e., inspiration and expiration). Results: Forty nine infants enrolled in this study: 25 healthy infants (G1) and 24 infants with LRTI. Inspiratory Fmax (G1: M 116.1 Hz IQR [107.2-132.4] vs G2: M 118.9Hz IQR [113.2-128.7], p=0.244) and expiratory frequencies (G1: M 107.3Hz IQR [102.9-116.9] vs G2: M 112.6Hz IQR [106.6-122.6], p= 0.083) slightly higher than their healthy peers. Wheeze occupation rate was statistically significantly different between groups in inspiration (G1: M 0 IQR [0-0.1] vs G2: M 0.2 IQR [0-5.2] p= 0.032) and expiration (G1: M 0 IQR [0-1.9] vs G2: M 1.5 IQR [0.2-6.7] p= 0.015), being the infants with LRTI the ones presenting more wheezes. Conclusion: Computerised respiratory sounds in healthy infants and infants with LRTI presented differences. The main findings indicated that NRS have Fmax higher in infants with LRTI than in healthy infant and Wh% was the characteristic that differ the most between infant with LRTI and healthy infant.