Tools to evaluate potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly: a systematic review.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Maria A
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando, Cabrita, José, Morais, José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/509
Resumo: Prescription of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in the elderly has gained growing attention from healthcare professionals, researchers, healthcare providers and politicians worldwide for safety issues. Taking into consideration the increased susceptibility of elderly patients to certain medicines, criteria to identify PIM and to alert professionals to prevent their prescription have been created.To gather published evidence regarding the characteristics and use of criteria to identify PIM.systematic review of studies published between 1990 and 2007. A literature retrieval using Pubmed and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was performed followed by a manual search of cited references. Cross-sectional studies using the most recent version of PIM criteria in patients aged 65 years or more were included. Studies which analyzed PIM in a single clinical condition of therapeutic class exclusively or those not attaining 75% of the quality score were excluded.the search retrieved 124 studies, being 10 of them selected for inclusion in the systematic review. The studies selected were conducted in Europe and the United States and the Beers criteria updated in 2003 were the most frequently used. Some authors, adapted PIM criteria according to differences in authorized medicines in their respective countries. Studies revealed a high prevalence of PIM, especially those using the 2003 Beers criteria. Most articles suggested strategies to reduce the PIM prevalence in the elderly such as: pre- and post-graduate education, the use of computerized systems to alert healthcare professionals, and creating restrictive policies by means of formularies.The Beers criteria were the most commonly used criteria to identify PIM in the elderly, revealing a high prevalence of inappropriate prescription in this population. Criteria were adapted to country specific needs when used outside the United States. Different strategies to reduce PIM prevalence in the elderly have been suggested.
id RCAP_a13877b8b504ae6fb84680261fa11301
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/509
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Tools to evaluate potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly: a systematic review.Critérios de avaliação de prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados: uma revisão sistemática.Prescription of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in the elderly has gained growing attention from healthcare professionals, researchers, healthcare providers and politicians worldwide for safety issues. Taking into consideration the increased susceptibility of elderly patients to certain medicines, criteria to identify PIM and to alert professionals to prevent their prescription have been created.To gather published evidence regarding the characteristics and use of criteria to identify PIM.systematic review of studies published between 1990 and 2007. A literature retrieval using Pubmed and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was performed followed by a manual search of cited references. Cross-sectional studies using the most recent version of PIM criteria in patients aged 65 years or more were included. Studies which analyzed PIM in a single clinical condition of therapeutic class exclusively or those not attaining 75% of the quality score were excluded.the search retrieved 124 studies, being 10 of them selected for inclusion in the systematic review. The studies selected were conducted in Europe and the United States and the Beers criteria updated in 2003 were the most frequently used. Some authors, adapted PIM criteria according to differences in authorized medicines in their respective countries. Studies revealed a high prevalence of PIM, especially those using the 2003 Beers criteria. Most articles suggested strategies to reduce the PIM prevalence in the elderly such as: pre- and post-graduate education, the use of computerized systems to alert healthcare professionals, and creating restrictive policies by means of formularies.The Beers criteria were the most commonly used criteria to identify PIM in the elderly, revealing a high prevalence of inappropriate prescription in this population. Criteria were adapted to country specific needs when used outside the United States. Different strategies to reduce PIM prevalence in the elderly have been suggested.Prescription of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in the elderly has gained growing attention from healthcare professionals, researchers, healthcare providers and politicians worldwide for safety issues. Taking into consideration the increased susceptibility of elderly patients to certain medicines, criteria to identify PIM and to alert professionals to prevent their prescription have been created.To gather published evidence regarding the characteristics and use of criteria to identify PIM.systematic review of studies published between 1990 and 2007. A literature retrieval using Pubmed and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was performed followed by a manual search of cited references. Cross-sectional studies using the most recent version of PIM criteria in patients aged 65 years or more were included. Studies which analyzed PIM in a single clinical condition of therapeutic class exclusively or those not attaining 75% of the quality score were excluded.the search retrieved 124 studies, being 10 of them selected for inclusion in the systematic review. The studies selected were conducted in Europe and the United States and the Beers criteria updated in 2003 were the most frequently used. Some authors, adapted PIM criteria according to differences in authorized medicines in their respective countries. Studies revealed a high prevalence of PIM, especially those using the 2003 Beers criteria. Most articles suggested strategies to reduce the PIM prevalence in the elderly such as: pre- and post-graduate education, the use of computerized systems to alert healthcare professionals, and creating restrictive policies by means of formularies.The Beers criteria were the most commonly used criteria to identify PIM in the elderly, revealing a high prevalence of inappropriate prescription in this population. Criteria were adapted to country specific needs when used outside the United States. Different strategies to reduce PIM prevalence in the elderly have been suggested.Ordem dos Médicos2011-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/509oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/509Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 24 No. 5 (2011): Setembro-Outubro; 775-84Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 24 N.º 5 (2011): Setembro-Outubro; 775-841646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/509https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/509/217Soares, Maria AFernandez-Llimos, FernandoCabrita, JoséMorais, Joséinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T10:56:26Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/509Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:16:33.987343Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tools to evaluate potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly: a systematic review.
Critérios de avaliação de prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados: uma revisão sistemática.
title Tools to evaluate potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly: a systematic review.
spellingShingle Tools to evaluate potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly: a systematic review.
Soares, Maria A
title_short Tools to evaluate potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly: a systematic review.
title_full Tools to evaluate potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly: a systematic review.
title_fullStr Tools to evaluate potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly: a systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Tools to evaluate potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly: a systematic review.
title_sort Tools to evaluate potentially inappropriate prescription in the elderly: a systematic review.
author Soares, Maria A
author_facet Soares, Maria A
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Cabrita, José
Morais, José
author_role author
author2 Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Cabrita, José
Morais, José
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Maria A
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Cabrita, José
Morais, José
description Prescription of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in the elderly has gained growing attention from healthcare professionals, researchers, healthcare providers and politicians worldwide for safety issues. Taking into consideration the increased susceptibility of elderly patients to certain medicines, criteria to identify PIM and to alert professionals to prevent their prescription have been created.To gather published evidence regarding the characteristics and use of criteria to identify PIM.systematic review of studies published between 1990 and 2007. A literature retrieval using Pubmed and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was performed followed by a manual search of cited references. Cross-sectional studies using the most recent version of PIM criteria in patients aged 65 years or more were included. Studies which analyzed PIM in a single clinical condition of therapeutic class exclusively or those not attaining 75% of the quality score were excluded.the search retrieved 124 studies, being 10 of them selected for inclusion in the systematic review. The studies selected were conducted in Europe and the United States and the Beers criteria updated in 2003 were the most frequently used. Some authors, adapted PIM criteria according to differences in authorized medicines in their respective countries. Studies revealed a high prevalence of PIM, especially those using the 2003 Beers criteria. Most articles suggested strategies to reduce the PIM prevalence in the elderly such as: pre- and post-graduate education, the use of computerized systems to alert healthcare professionals, and creating restrictive policies by means of formularies.The Beers criteria were the most commonly used criteria to identify PIM in the elderly, revealing a high prevalence of inappropriate prescription in this population. Criteria were adapted to country specific needs when used outside the United States. Different strategies to reduce PIM prevalence in the elderly have been suggested.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/509
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/509
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/509
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/509
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/509
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/509/217
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 24 No. 5 (2011): Setembro-Outubro; 775-84
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 24 N.º 5 (2011): Setembro-Outubro; 775-84
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130619238678528