Membranous nephropathy successfully treated with a Ponticelli regimen in a patient with HIV: do not assume that a well-known secondary cause is the real cause!

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Meng,C
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Pereira,L, Guedes,L, Nunes,A, Pereira,P, Frazão,JM, Pestana,M
Tipo de documento: Relatório
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000400009
Resumo: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy with high-risk criteria for renal disease progression is considered an indication for immunosuppressive treatment. HIV infection has been associated with membranous nephropathy in a minority of patients. A 44-year-old female diagnosed with HIV infection 11 years ago was referred for a nephrology consultation due to nephrotic syndrome. She presented with peripheral edema for 2 months and normal blood pressure. Serum creatinine was 0.74 mg/dL, total cholesterol 490 mg/dL, albumin 2.0 g/dL; urinary examination revealed leukoerythrocyturia and 24h proteinuria was 4.5g. Renal ultrasound showed normal-sized kidneys with preserved corticomedullary differentiation. Kidney biopsy showed thickening of the glomerular basal membrane and staining with Masson trichrome showed sub-epithelial humps. Immunofluorescence was negative except for IgA (+), C3c (+) and IgG (+). A diagnosis of membranous nephropathy was made. Secondary causes, such as neoplasic, infectious and autoimmune, were ruled out. Despite 6 months of conservative measures, proteinuria increased to 11 g/day. Since HIV viral load had been undetectable for several years, along with a CD4+ T cell count persistently above 400/mm3, a modified Ponticelli regimen was started: 3 pulses of methylprednisolone (1g/day), followed by 60 mg of prednisolone/day at months 1, 3 and 5, and cyclophosphamide 200mg/day at months 2, 4 and 6. At the end of the treatment, there was a partial response with proteinuria 3.94 g/day, albumin 3.2 g/dL, and creatinine 0.8 mg/dL. At 48 months of follow-up, the patient is asymptomatic, with creatinine 0.84 mg/dL and proteinuria 0.97 g/day. Conclusion: Membranous nephropathy should be considered in the differential diagnosis in patients with HIV infection complicated by nephrotic syndrome even in the absence of other coinfections and comorbidities typically associated with membranous nephropathy. In patients with sustained negative viral loads and at high risk of progression to end-stage renal disease, in whom secondary causes have been excluded, immunosuppressive therapy might be considered.
id RCAP_a14749ffc13b6bb0ec73ef9c9c758d67
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0872-01692018000400009
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Membranous nephropathy successfully treated with a Ponticelli regimen in a patient with HIV: do not assume that a well-known secondary cause is the real cause!HIVMembranous nephropathyPonticelliIdiopathic membranous nephropathy with high-risk criteria for renal disease progression is considered an indication for immunosuppressive treatment. HIV infection has been associated with membranous nephropathy in a minority of patients. A 44-year-old female diagnosed with HIV infection 11 years ago was referred for a nephrology consultation due to nephrotic syndrome. She presented with peripheral edema for 2 months and normal blood pressure. Serum creatinine was 0.74 mg/dL, total cholesterol 490 mg/dL, albumin 2.0 g/dL; urinary examination revealed leukoerythrocyturia and 24h proteinuria was 4.5g. Renal ultrasound showed normal-sized kidneys with preserved corticomedullary differentiation. Kidney biopsy showed thickening of the glomerular basal membrane and staining with Masson trichrome showed sub-epithelial humps. Immunofluorescence was negative except for IgA (+), C3c (+) and IgG (+). A diagnosis of membranous nephropathy was made. Secondary causes, such as neoplasic, infectious and autoimmune, were ruled out. Despite 6 months of conservative measures, proteinuria increased to 11 g/day. Since HIV viral load had been undetectable for several years, along with a CD4+ T cell count persistently above 400/mm3, a modified Ponticelli regimen was started: 3 pulses of methylprednisolone (1g/day), followed by 60 mg of prednisolone/day at months 1, 3 and 5, and cyclophosphamide 200mg/day at months 2, 4 and 6. At the end of the treatment, there was a partial response with proteinuria 3.94 g/day, albumin 3.2 g/dL, and creatinine 0.8 mg/dL. At 48 months of follow-up, the patient is asymptomatic, with creatinine 0.84 mg/dL and proteinuria 0.97 g/day. Conclusion: Membranous nephropathy should be considered in the differential diagnosis in patients with HIV infection complicated by nephrotic syndrome even in the absence of other coinfections and comorbidities typically associated with membranous nephropathy. In patients with sustained negative viral loads and at high risk of progression to end-stage renal disease, in whom secondary causes have been excluded, immunosuppressive therapy might be considered.Sociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/reporttext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000400009Portuguese Journal of Nephrology & Hypertension v.32 n.4 2018reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000400009Meng,CPereira,LGuedes,LNunes,APereira,PFrazão,JMPestana,Minfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:05:00Zoai:scielo:S0872-01692018000400009Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:19:01.569423Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Membranous nephropathy successfully treated with a Ponticelli regimen in a patient with HIV: do not assume that a well-known secondary cause is the real cause!
title Membranous nephropathy successfully treated with a Ponticelli regimen in a patient with HIV: do not assume that a well-known secondary cause is the real cause!
spellingShingle Membranous nephropathy successfully treated with a Ponticelli regimen in a patient with HIV: do not assume that a well-known secondary cause is the real cause!
Meng,C
HIV
Membranous nephropathy
Ponticelli
title_short Membranous nephropathy successfully treated with a Ponticelli regimen in a patient with HIV: do not assume that a well-known secondary cause is the real cause!
title_full Membranous nephropathy successfully treated with a Ponticelli regimen in a patient with HIV: do not assume that a well-known secondary cause is the real cause!
title_fullStr Membranous nephropathy successfully treated with a Ponticelli regimen in a patient with HIV: do not assume that a well-known secondary cause is the real cause!
title_full_unstemmed Membranous nephropathy successfully treated with a Ponticelli regimen in a patient with HIV: do not assume that a well-known secondary cause is the real cause!
title_sort Membranous nephropathy successfully treated with a Ponticelli regimen in a patient with HIV: do not assume that a well-known secondary cause is the real cause!
author Meng,C
author_facet Meng,C
Pereira,L
Guedes,L
Nunes,A
Pereira,P
Frazão,JM
Pestana,M
author_role author
author2 Pereira,L
Guedes,L
Nunes,A
Pereira,P
Frazão,JM
Pestana,M
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Meng,C
Pereira,L
Guedes,L
Nunes,A
Pereira,P
Frazão,JM
Pestana,M
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv HIV
Membranous nephropathy
Ponticelli
topic HIV
Membranous nephropathy
Ponticelli
description Idiopathic membranous nephropathy with high-risk criteria for renal disease progression is considered an indication for immunosuppressive treatment. HIV infection has been associated with membranous nephropathy in a minority of patients. A 44-year-old female diagnosed with HIV infection 11 years ago was referred for a nephrology consultation due to nephrotic syndrome. She presented with peripheral edema for 2 months and normal blood pressure. Serum creatinine was 0.74 mg/dL, total cholesterol 490 mg/dL, albumin 2.0 g/dL; urinary examination revealed leukoerythrocyturia and 24h proteinuria was 4.5g. Renal ultrasound showed normal-sized kidneys with preserved corticomedullary differentiation. Kidney biopsy showed thickening of the glomerular basal membrane and staining with Masson trichrome showed sub-epithelial humps. Immunofluorescence was negative except for IgA (+), C3c (+) and IgG (+). A diagnosis of membranous nephropathy was made. Secondary causes, such as neoplasic, infectious and autoimmune, were ruled out. Despite 6 months of conservative measures, proteinuria increased to 11 g/day. Since HIV viral load had been undetectable for several years, along with a CD4+ T cell count persistently above 400/mm3, a modified Ponticelli regimen was started: 3 pulses of methylprednisolone (1g/day), followed by 60 mg of prednisolone/day at months 1, 3 and 5, and cyclophosphamide 200mg/day at months 2, 4 and 6. At the end of the treatment, there was a partial response with proteinuria 3.94 g/day, albumin 3.2 g/dL, and creatinine 0.8 mg/dL. At 48 months of follow-up, the patient is asymptomatic, with creatinine 0.84 mg/dL and proteinuria 0.97 g/day. Conclusion: Membranous nephropathy should be considered in the differential diagnosis in patients with HIV infection complicated by nephrotic syndrome even in the absence of other coinfections and comorbidities typically associated with membranous nephropathy. In patients with sustained negative viral loads and at high risk of progression to end-stage renal disease, in whom secondary causes have been excluded, immunosuppressive therapy might be considered.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
format report
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000400009
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000400009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692018000400009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Nephrology & Hypertension v.32 n.4 2018
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1817553720951439360