Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9741 |
Resumo: | Topic map constraint language (TMCL) provides a means to express constraints on topic maps conforming to ISO/IEC 13250. In this article, we will use a test suite and show, step-by-step, the way we handled several kinds of topic maps constraints in many different instances in order to answer questions like: Do they do the same job? Are there some kinds of topic maps constraints that are easier to specify with one of them? Do you need different background to use the tools? Is it possible to use them in similar situations (the same topic maps instances)? May we use them to produce an equal result? How do AsTMa!, OSL, Toma and XTche relate to TMCL? What kind of constraints each one of these three cannot specify? We will conclude this paper with a summary of the comparisons accomplished between those topic maps constraint languages over the use case proposed. |
id |
RCAP_a1929422452af966a0dce8def44c41e7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/9741 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparingKnowledge representationTopic mapsConstraint languagesXMLIntelligent systemsTopic map constraint language (TMCL) provides a means to express constraints on topic maps conforming to ISO/IEC 13250. In this article, we will use a test suite and show, step-by-step, the way we handled several kinds of topic maps constraints in many different instances in order to answer questions like: Do they do the same job? Are there some kinds of topic maps constraints that are easier to specify with one of them? Do you need different background to use the tools? Is it possible to use them in similar situations (the same topic maps instances)? May we use them to produce an equal result? How do AsTMa!, OSL, Toma and XTche relate to TMCL? What kind of constraints each one of these three cannot specify? We will conclude this paper with a summary of the comparisons accomplished between those topic maps constraint languages over the use case proposed.(undefined)InderscienceUniversidade do MinhoLibrelotto, Giovani RubertAzevedo, Renato Preigschadt deRamalho, José CarlosHenriques, Pedro Rangel20092009-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/9741eng"International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems". ISSN 1755-0556. 1:3-4 (2009) 173 - 181.1755-055610.1504/IJRIS.2009.028016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:31:55ZPortal AgregadorONG |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing |
title |
Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing |
spellingShingle |
Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing Librelotto, Giovani Rubert Knowledge representation Topic maps Constraint languages XML Intelligent systems |
title_short |
Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing |
title_full |
Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing |
title_fullStr |
Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing |
title_sort |
Topic maps constraint languages : understanding and comparing |
author |
Librelotto, Giovani Rubert |
author_facet |
Librelotto, Giovani Rubert Azevedo, Renato Preigschadt de Ramalho, José Carlos Henriques, Pedro Rangel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Azevedo, Renato Preigschadt de Ramalho, José Carlos Henriques, Pedro Rangel |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Librelotto, Giovani Rubert Azevedo, Renato Preigschadt de Ramalho, José Carlos Henriques, Pedro Rangel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Knowledge representation Topic maps Constraint languages XML Intelligent systems |
topic |
Knowledge representation Topic maps Constraint languages XML Intelligent systems |
description |
Topic map constraint language (TMCL) provides a means to express constraints on topic maps conforming to ISO/IEC 13250. In this article, we will use a test suite and show, step-by-step, the way we handled several kinds of topic maps constraints in many different instances in order to answer questions like: Do they do the same job? Are there some kinds of topic maps constraints that are easier to specify with one of them? Do you need different background to use the tools? Is it possible to use them in similar situations (the same topic maps instances)? May we use them to produce an equal result? How do AsTMa!, OSL, Toma and XTche relate to TMCL? What kind of constraints each one of these three cannot specify? We will conclude this paper with a summary of the comparisons accomplished between those topic maps constraint languages over the use case proposed. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9741 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9741 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
"International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems". ISSN 1755-0556. 1:3-4 (2009) 173 - 181. 1755-0556 10.1504/IJRIS.2009.028016 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Inderscience |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Inderscience |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1777303779955179520 |