Recycling organic wastes to agricultural land as a way to improve its quality: A field study to evaluate benefits and risks.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alvarenga, Paula
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Palma, Patrícia, Mourinha, C., Farto, M., Dôres, J., Patanita, Manuel, Sousa, J. P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/4506
Resumo: A field study was established to assess the effects of a sewage sludge (SS), a mixed municipal solid waste compost (MMSWC) and a compost produced from agricultural wastes (AWC), in a Vertisol, using Lolium multiflorum L. The amendments were applied for two consecutive years: 6, 12 and 24 t dry matter ha−1 for SS, and the amendment doses for MMSWC and AWC were calculated to deliver the same amount of organic matter (OM) per unit area. The amendments had significant beneficial effects on some soil properties (e.g. soil OM, NKjeldahl, extractable P and K), and on plant productivity parameters (e.g. biomass yield, chlorophyll, foliar area). For instance, soil OM increased from 0.78% to 1.71, 2.48 and 2.51%, after two consecutive years of application of 24 t dry matter ha−1 of SS, MMSWC and AWC, respectively, while the plant biomass obtained increased from 7.75 t ha−1 to 152.41, 78.14 and 29.26 t ha−1, for the same amendments. On the plant, effects were more pronounced for SS than for both compost applications, a consequence of its higher capacity to provide N to the plant in a readily available form. However, after two years of application, the effects on soil properties were more noticeable for both composts, as their OM is more resistant to mineralization, which endures their beneficial effects on soil. Cadmium, Cr, Ni and Pb pseudo-total concentrations, were not affected significantly by the application of the organic wastes to soil, in all tested doses, neither their extractability by 0.01 M CaCl2. On the contrary, Cu and Zn pseudo-total concentrations increased significantly in the second year of the experiment, following the application of the higher rate of MMSWC and AWC, although their extractability remained very low (<0.5% of their pseudo-total fraction). Trace elements concentrations in the aboveground plant material were lower than their maximum tolerable levels for cattle, used as an indicator of risk of their entry into the human food chain. Despite these results, it is interesting to note that the SS promoted a significant increase in the foliar concentrations of Cu, Ni and Zn that did not happen in composts application, which can be explained by the reduction of the soil pH, as a consequence of SS degradation in soil. Concluding, if this type of organic wastes were to be used in a single application, the rate could be as high as 12 or even 24 t ha−1, however, if they are to be applied in an annual basis, the application rates should be lowered to assure their safe application (e.g. to 6 t ha−1). Moreover, it is advisable to use more stable and mature organic wastes, which have longer lasting positive effects on soil characteristics.
id RCAP_a21ce8000de22bf5f6713f8717441e42
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipbeja.pt:20.500.12207/4506
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Recycling organic wastes to agricultural land as a way to improve its quality: A field study to evaluate benefits and risks.Agricultural wastesAgricultureBiomassLeadMunicipal solid wasteNickelRecyclingSewage sludgeSoil surveysSoilsTrace elementsWastesZincA field study was established to assess the effects of a sewage sludge (SS), a mixed municipal solid waste compost (MMSWC) and a compost produced from agricultural wastes (AWC), in a Vertisol, using Lolium multiflorum L. The amendments were applied for two consecutive years: 6, 12 and 24 t dry matter ha−1 for SS, and the amendment doses for MMSWC and AWC were calculated to deliver the same amount of organic matter (OM) per unit area. The amendments had significant beneficial effects on some soil properties (e.g. soil OM, NKjeldahl, extractable P and K), and on plant productivity parameters (e.g. biomass yield, chlorophyll, foliar area). For instance, soil OM increased from 0.78% to 1.71, 2.48 and 2.51%, after two consecutive years of application of 24 t dry matter ha−1 of SS, MMSWC and AWC, respectively, while the plant biomass obtained increased from 7.75 t ha−1 to 152.41, 78.14 and 29.26 t ha−1, for the same amendments. On the plant, effects were more pronounced for SS than for both compost applications, a consequence of its higher capacity to provide N to the plant in a readily available form. However, after two years of application, the effects on soil properties were more noticeable for both composts, as their OM is more resistant to mineralization, which endures their beneficial effects on soil. Cadmium, Cr, Ni and Pb pseudo-total concentrations, were not affected significantly by the application of the organic wastes to soil, in all tested doses, neither their extractability by 0.01 M CaCl2. On the contrary, Cu and Zn pseudo-total concentrations increased significantly in the second year of the experiment, following the application of the higher rate of MMSWC and AWC, although their extractability remained very low (<0.5% of their pseudo-total fraction). Trace elements concentrations in the aboveground plant material were lower than their maximum tolerable levels for cattle, used as an indicator of risk of their entry into the human food chain. Despite these results, it is interesting to note that the SS promoted a significant increase in the foliar concentrations of Cu, Ni and Zn that did not happen in composts application, which can be explained by the reduction of the soil pH, as a consequence of SS degradation in soil. Concluding, if this type of organic wastes were to be used in a single application, the rate could be as high as 12 or even 24 t ha−1, however, if they are to be applied in an annual basis, the application rates should be lowered to assure their safe application (e.g. to 6 t ha−1). Moreover, it is advisable to use more stable and mature organic wastes, which have longer lasting positive effects on soil characteristics.Elsevier2017-03-30T10:15:25Z2017-03-01T00:00:00Z2017-03-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/4506eng0956053Xhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.004metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlvarenga, PaulaPalma, PatríciaMourinha, C.Farto, M.Dôres, J.Patanita, ManuelSousa, J. P.reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-06-23T07:46:53Zoai:repositorio.ipbeja.pt:20.500.12207/4506Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T14:58:39.981205Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Recycling organic wastes to agricultural land as a way to improve its quality: A field study to evaluate benefits and risks.
title Recycling organic wastes to agricultural land as a way to improve its quality: A field study to evaluate benefits and risks.
spellingShingle Recycling organic wastes to agricultural land as a way to improve its quality: A field study to evaluate benefits and risks.
Alvarenga, Paula
Agricultural wastes
Agriculture
Biomass
Lead
Municipal solid waste
Nickel
Recycling
Sewage sludge
Soil surveys
Soils
Trace elements
Wastes
Zinc
title_short Recycling organic wastes to agricultural land as a way to improve its quality: A field study to evaluate benefits and risks.
title_full Recycling organic wastes to agricultural land as a way to improve its quality: A field study to evaluate benefits and risks.
title_fullStr Recycling organic wastes to agricultural land as a way to improve its quality: A field study to evaluate benefits and risks.
title_full_unstemmed Recycling organic wastes to agricultural land as a way to improve its quality: A field study to evaluate benefits and risks.
title_sort Recycling organic wastes to agricultural land as a way to improve its quality: A field study to evaluate benefits and risks.
author Alvarenga, Paula
author_facet Alvarenga, Paula
Palma, Patrícia
Mourinha, C.
Farto, M.
Dôres, J.
Patanita, Manuel
Sousa, J. P.
author_role author
author2 Palma, Patrícia
Mourinha, C.
Farto, M.
Dôres, J.
Patanita, Manuel
Sousa, J. P.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alvarenga, Paula
Palma, Patrícia
Mourinha, C.
Farto, M.
Dôres, J.
Patanita, Manuel
Sousa, J. P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agricultural wastes
Agriculture
Biomass
Lead
Municipal solid waste
Nickel
Recycling
Sewage sludge
Soil surveys
Soils
Trace elements
Wastes
Zinc
topic Agricultural wastes
Agriculture
Biomass
Lead
Municipal solid waste
Nickel
Recycling
Sewage sludge
Soil surveys
Soils
Trace elements
Wastes
Zinc
description A field study was established to assess the effects of a sewage sludge (SS), a mixed municipal solid waste compost (MMSWC) and a compost produced from agricultural wastes (AWC), in a Vertisol, using Lolium multiflorum L. The amendments were applied for two consecutive years: 6, 12 and 24 t dry matter ha−1 for SS, and the amendment doses for MMSWC and AWC were calculated to deliver the same amount of organic matter (OM) per unit area. The amendments had significant beneficial effects on some soil properties (e.g. soil OM, NKjeldahl, extractable P and K), and on plant productivity parameters (e.g. biomass yield, chlorophyll, foliar area). For instance, soil OM increased from 0.78% to 1.71, 2.48 and 2.51%, after two consecutive years of application of 24 t dry matter ha−1 of SS, MMSWC and AWC, respectively, while the plant biomass obtained increased from 7.75 t ha−1 to 152.41, 78.14 and 29.26 t ha−1, for the same amendments. On the plant, effects were more pronounced for SS than for both compost applications, a consequence of its higher capacity to provide N to the plant in a readily available form. However, after two years of application, the effects on soil properties were more noticeable for both composts, as their OM is more resistant to mineralization, which endures their beneficial effects on soil. Cadmium, Cr, Ni and Pb pseudo-total concentrations, were not affected significantly by the application of the organic wastes to soil, in all tested doses, neither their extractability by 0.01 M CaCl2. On the contrary, Cu and Zn pseudo-total concentrations increased significantly in the second year of the experiment, following the application of the higher rate of MMSWC and AWC, although their extractability remained very low (<0.5% of their pseudo-total fraction). Trace elements concentrations in the aboveground plant material were lower than their maximum tolerable levels for cattle, used as an indicator of risk of their entry into the human food chain. Despite these results, it is interesting to note that the SS promoted a significant increase in the foliar concentrations of Cu, Ni and Zn that did not happen in composts application, which can be explained by the reduction of the soil pH, as a consequence of SS degradation in soil. Concluding, if this type of organic wastes were to be used in a single application, the rate could be as high as 12 or even 24 t ha−1, however, if they are to be applied in an annual basis, the application rates should be lowered to assure their safe application (e.g. to 6 t ha−1). Moreover, it is advisable to use more stable and mature organic wastes, which have longer lasting positive effects on soil characteristics.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-30T10:15:25Z
2017-03-01T00:00:00Z
2017-03-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/4506
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12207/4506
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0956053X
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv metadata only access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv metadata only access
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799129860376887296