A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Gender

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baumgart, Lene
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Boos, Pauline, Braunsmann, Katharina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7056
Resumo: In the digitalization debate, gender biases in digital technologies play a significant role because of their potential for social exclusion and inequality. It is therefore remarkable that organizations as drivers of digitalization and as places for social integration have been widely overlooked so far. Simultaneously, gender biases and digitalization have structurally immanent connections to organizations. Therefore, a look at the reciprocal relationship between organizations, digitalization, and gender is needed. The article provides answers to the question of whether and how organizations (re)produce, reinforce, or diminish gender‐specific inequalities during their digital transformations. On the one hand, gender inequalities emerge when organizations use post‐bureaucratic concepts through digitalization. On the other hand, gender inequalities are reproduced when organizations either program or implement digital technologies and fail to establish control structures that prevent gender biases. This article shows that digitalization can act as a catalyst for inequality‐producing mechanisms, but also has the potential to mitigate inequalities. We argue that organizations must be considered when discussing the potential of exclusion through digitalization.
id RCAP_a254dad5019f2b967e8748fdf40d5444
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7056
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Genderdigitalization; gender bias; gender inequalities; organizationsIn the digitalization debate, gender biases in digital technologies play a significant role because of their potential for social exclusion and inequality. It is therefore remarkable that organizations as drivers of digitalization and as places for social integration have been widely overlooked so far. Simultaneously, gender biases and digitalization have structurally immanent connections to organizations. Therefore, a look at the reciprocal relationship between organizations, digitalization, and gender is needed. The article provides answers to the question of whether and how organizations (re)produce, reinforce, or diminish gender‐specific inequalities during their digital transformations. On the one hand, gender inequalities emerge when organizations use post‐bureaucratic concepts through digitalization. On the other hand, gender inequalities are reproduced when organizations either program or implement digital technologies and fail to establish control structures that prevent gender biases. This article shows that digitalization can act as a catalyst for inequality‐producing mechanisms, but also has the potential to mitigate inequalities. We argue that organizations must be considered when discussing the potential of exclusion through digitalization.Cogitatio Press2023-11-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7056https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7056Social Inclusion; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Digitalization of Working Worlds and Social Inclusion; 160-1712183-280310.17645/si.i370reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7056https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7056/3425Copyright (c) 2023 Lene Baumgart, Pauline Boos, Katharina Braunsmanninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaumgart, LeneBoos, PaulineBraunsmann, Katharina2024-01-04T13:36:30Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7056Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:53:51.337151Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Gender
title A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Gender
spellingShingle A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Gender
Baumgart, Lene
digitalization; gender bias; gender inequalities; organizations
title_short A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Gender
title_full A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Gender
title_fullStr A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Gender
title_full_unstemmed A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Gender
title_sort A Circulatory Loop: The Reciprocal Relationship of Organizations, Digitalization, and Gender
author Baumgart, Lene
author_facet Baumgart, Lene
Boos, Pauline
Braunsmann, Katharina
author_role author
author2 Boos, Pauline
Braunsmann, Katharina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baumgart, Lene
Boos, Pauline
Braunsmann, Katharina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv digitalization; gender bias; gender inequalities; organizations
topic digitalization; gender bias; gender inequalities; organizations
description In the digitalization debate, gender biases in digital technologies play a significant role because of their potential for social exclusion and inequality. It is therefore remarkable that organizations as drivers of digitalization and as places for social integration have been widely overlooked so far. Simultaneously, gender biases and digitalization have structurally immanent connections to organizations. Therefore, a look at the reciprocal relationship between organizations, digitalization, and gender is needed. The article provides answers to the question of whether and how organizations (re)produce, reinforce, or diminish gender‐specific inequalities during their digital transformations. On the one hand, gender inequalities emerge when organizations use post‐bureaucratic concepts through digitalization. On the other hand, gender inequalities are reproduced when organizations either program or implement digital technologies and fail to establish control structures that prevent gender biases. This article shows that digitalization can act as a catalyst for inequality‐producing mechanisms, but also has the potential to mitigate inequalities. We argue that organizations must be considered when discussing the potential of exclusion through digitalization.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7056
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7056
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7056
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7056
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7056/3425
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Lene Baumgart, Pauline Boos, Katharina Braunsmann
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Lene Baumgart, Pauline Boos, Katharina Braunsmann
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Digitalization of Working Worlds and Social Inclusion; 160-171
2183-2803
10.17645/si.i370
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135136396083200