De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross-cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/40314 |
Resumo: | Since at least Hume and Kant, philosophers working on the nature of aesthetic judgment have generally agreed that common sense does not treat aesthetic judgments in the same way as typical expressions of subjective preferences—rather, it endows them with intersubjective validity, the property of being right or wrong regardless of disagreement. Moreover, this apparent intersubjective validity has been taken to constitute one of the main explananda for philosophical accounts of aesthetic judgment. But is it really the case that most people spontaneously treat aesthetic judgments as having intersubjective validity? In this paper, we report the results of a cross-cultural study with over 2,000 respondents spanning 19 countries. Despite significant geographical variations, these results suggest that most people do not treat their own aesthetic judgments as having intersubjective validity. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for theories of aesthetic judgment and the purpose of aesthetics in general. |
id |
RCAP_a2e882ed248629a04defc795bdc5cb8a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/40314 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross-cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgmentAesthetic judgmentAesthetic realismCross-culturalExperimental philosophySince at least Hume and Kant, philosophers working on the nature of aesthetic judgment have generally agreed that common sense does not treat aesthetic judgments in the same way as typical expressions of subjective preferences—rather, it endows them with intersubjective validity, the property of being right or wrong regardless of disagreement. Moreover, this apparent intersubjective validity has been taken to constitute one of the main explananda for philosophical accounts of aesthetic judgment. But is it really the case that most people spontaneously treat aesthetic judgments as having intersubjective validity? In this paper, we report the results of a cross-cultural study with over 2,000 respondents spanning 19 countries. Despite significant geographical variations, these results suggest that most people do not treat their own aesthetic judgments as having intersubjective validity. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for theories of aesthetic judgment and the purpose of aesthetics in general.Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaCova, FlorianOlivola, Christopher Y.Machery, EdouardStich, StephenRose, DavidAlai, MarioAngelucci, AdrianoBerniūnas, RenatasBuchtel, Emma E.Chatterjee, AmitaCheon, HyundeukCho, In RaeCohnitz, DanielDranseika, ViliusLagos, Ángeles E.Ghadakpour, LalehGrinberg, MauriceHannikainen, IvarHashimoto, TakaakiHorowitz, AmirHristova, EvgeniyaJraissati, YasminaKadreva, VeselinaKarasawa, KaoriKim, HackjinKim, YeonjeongLee, MinwooMauro, CarlosMizumoto, MasaharuMoruzzi, SebastianoOrnelas, JorgeOsimani, BarbaraRomero, CarlosRosas, AlejandroSangoi, MassimoSereni, AndreaSonghorian, SarahSousa, PauloStruchiner, NoelTripodi, VeraUsui, NaokiMercado, Alejandro V. delVolpe, GiorgioVosgerichian, Hrag A.Zhang, XueyiZhu, Jing2023-02-22T11:05:06Z2019-062019-06-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/40314eng0268-106410.1111/mila.1221085052377077000471283500003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:45:51Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/40314Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:33:01.992006Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross-cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment |
title |
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross-cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment |
spellingShingle |
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross-cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment Cova, Florian Aesthetic judgment Aesthetic realism Cross-cultural Experimental philosophy |
title_short |
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross-cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment |
title_full |
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross-cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment |
title_fullStr |
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross-cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment |
title_full_unstemmed |
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross-cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment |
title_sort |
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross-cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment |
author |
Cova, Florian |
author_facet |
Cova, Florian Olivola, Christopher Y. Machery, Edouard Stich, Stephen Rose, David Alai, Mario Angelucci, Adriano Berniūnas, Renatas Buchtel, Emma E. Chatterjee, Amita Cheon, Hyundeuk Cho, In Rae Cohnitz, Daniel Dranseika, Vilius Lagos, Ángeles E. Ghadakpour, Laleh Grinberg, Maurice Hannikainen, Ivar Hashimoto, Takaaki Horowitz, Amir Hristova, Evgeniya Jraissati, Yasmina Kadreva, Veselina Karasawa, Kaori Kim, Hackjin Kim, Yeonjeong Lee, Minwoo Mauro, Carlos Mizumoto, Masaharu Moruzzi, Sebastiano Ornelas, Jorge Osimani, Barbara Romero, Carlos Rosas, Alejandro Sangoi, Massimo Sereni, Andrea Songhorian, Sarah Sousa, Paulo Struchiner, Noel Tripodi, Vera Usui, Naoki Mercado, Alejandro V. del Volpe, Giorgio Vosgerichian, Hrag A. Zhang, Xueyi Zhu, Jing |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Olivola, Christopher Y. Machery, Edouard Stich, Stephen Rose, David Alai, Mario Angelucci, Adriano Berniūnas, Renatas Buchtel, Emma E. Chatterjee, Amita Cheon, Hyundeuk Cho, In Rae Cohnitz, Daniel Dranseika, Vilius Lagos, Ángeles E. Ghadakpour, Laleh Grinberg, Maurice Hannikainen, Ivar Hashimoto, Takaaki Horowitz, Amir Hristova, Evgeniya Jraissati, Yasmina Kadreva, Veselina Karasawa, Kaori Kim, Hackjin Kim, Yeonjeong Lee, Minwoo Mauro, Carlos Mizumoto, Masaharu Moruzzi, Sebastiano Ornelas, Jorge Osimani, Barbara Romero, Carlos Rosas, Alejandro Sangoi, Massimo Sereni, Andrea Songhorian, Sarah Sousa, Paulo Struchiner, Noel Tripodi, Vera Usui, Naoki Mercado, Alejandro V. del Volpe, Giorgio Vosgerichian, Hrag A. Zhang, Xueyi Zhu, Jing |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cova, Florian Olivola, Christopher Y. Machery, Edouard Stich, Stephen Rose, David Alai, Mario Angelucci, Adriano Berniūnas, Renatas Buchtel, Emma E. Chatterjee, Amita Cheon, Hyundeuk Cho, In Rae Cohnitz, Daniel Dranseika, Vilius Lagos, Ángeles E. Ghadakpour, Laleh Grinberg, Maurice Hannikainen, Ivar Hashimoto, Takaaki Horowitz, Amir Hristova, Evgeniya Jraissati, Yasmina Kadreva, Veselina Karasawa, Kaori Kim, Hackjin Kim, Yeonjeong Lee, Minwoo Mauro, Carlos Mizumoto, Masaharu Moruzzi, Sebastiano Ornelas, Jorge Osimani, Barbara Romero, Carlos Rosas, Alejandro Sangoi, Massimo Sereni, Andrea Songhorian, Sarah Sousa, Paulo Struchiner, Noel Tripodi, Vera Usui, Naoki Mercado, Alejandro V. del Volpe, Giorgio Vosgerichian, Hrag A. Zhang, Xueyi Zhu, Jing |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aesthetic judgment Aesthetic realism Cross-cultural Experimental philosophy |
topic |
Aesthetic judgment Aesthetic realism Cross-cultural Experimental philosophy |
description |
Since at least Hume and Kant, philosophers working on the nature of aesthetic judgment have generally agreed that common sense does not treat aesthetic judgments in the same way as typical expressions of subjective preferences—rather, it endows them with intersubjective validity, the property of being right or wrong regardless of disagreement. Moreover, this apparent intersubjective validity has been taken to constitute one of the main explananda for philosophical accounts of aesthetic judgment. But is it really the case that most people spontaneously treat aesthetic judgments as having intersubjective validity? In this paper, we report the results of a cross-cultural study with over 2,000 respondents spanning 19 countries. Despite significant geographical variations, these results suggest that most people do not treat their own aesthetic judgments as having intersubjective validity. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for theories of aesthetic judgment and the purpose of aesthetics in general. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06 2019-06-01T00:00:00Z 2023-02-22T11:05:06Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/40314 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/40314 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0268-1064 10.1111/mila.12210 85052377077 000471283500003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132056196743168 |