Mozambique petroleum legal framework : comparative assessment of Mozambique stabilization clauses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendes, Tiago Arouca
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/35087
Resumo: This study identifies and critically analyzes the evolution of stabilization clauses in international petroleum contracts entered between the Host Government (“HG”) and International Oil Companies (“IOCs”) with a focus on Mozambique. It then compares Mozambique’s stabilization provisions to those in three other African countries that have an active oil and gas industry. All four countries seek foreign investment in their oil and gas sectors. Foreign investors, in turn, seek to mitigate the many legal risks that arise in contracts signed with HGs as sovereigns. Investors look for stabilization and arbitration provisions in Petroleum Exploration & Production Contracts (“EPCs”) that increase the security of their investments. The article finds that Mozambique offers considerable security in its contracts compared to Angola, Ghana and Tanzania. Only Ghana offers a similar degree of stabilization in its contracts as Mozambique offers. The Angolan government does not resort to many of these stabilization mechanisms, probably because of the maturity of its petroleum industry, despite presenting quite a risky profile when compared to the other countries. Tanzania still has a long way to go in offering security to investors through stabilization clauses.
id RCAP_a48bb0bd6d4df3f22e85970e41fc1611
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/35087
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Mozambique petroleum legal framework : comparative assessment of Mozambique stabilization clausesDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::DireitoThis study identifies and critically analyzes the evolution of stabilization clauses in international petroleum contracts entered between the Host Government (“HG”) and International Oil Companies (“IOCs”) with a focus on Mozambique. It then compares Mozambique’s stabilization provisions to those in three other African countries that have an active oil and gas industry. All four countries seek foreign investment in their oil and gas sectors. Foreign investors, in turn, seek to mitigate the many legal risks that arise in contracts signed with HGs as sovereigns. Investors look for stabilization and arbitration provisions in Petroleum Exploration & Production Contracts (“EPCs”) that increase the security of their investments. The article finds that Mozambique offers considerable security in its contracts compared to Angola, Ghana and Tanzania. Only Ghana offers a similar degree of stabilization in its contracts as Mozambique offers. The Angolan government does not resort to many of these stabilization mechanisms, probably because of the maturity of its petroleum industry, despite presenting quite a risky profile when compared to the other countries. Tanzania still has a long way to go in offering security to investors through stabilization clauses.Weaver, Jacqueline L.Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaMendes, Tiago Arouca2021-09-22T08:50:05Z2021-09-1320212021-09-13T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/35087TID:202763838enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:40:36Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/35087Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:28:27.367324Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mozambique petroleum legal framework : comparative assessment of Mozambique stabilization clauses
title Mozambique petroleum legal framework : comparative assessment of Mozambique stabilization clauses
spellingShingle Mozambique petroleum legal framework : comparative assessment of Mozambique stabilization clauses
Mendes, Tiago Arouca
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Direito
title_short Mozambique petroleum legal framework : comparative assessment of Mozambique stabilization clauses
title_full Mozambique petroleum legal framework : comparative assessment of Mozambique stabilization clauses
title_fullStr Mozambique petroleum legal framework : comparative assessment of Mozambique stabilization clauses
title_full_unstemmed Mozambique petroleum legal framework : comparative assessment of Mozambique stabilization clauses
title_sort Mozambique petroleum legal framework : comparative assessment of Mozambique stabilization clauses
author Mendes, Tiago Arouca
author_facet Mendes, Tiago Arouca
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Weaver, Jacqueline L.
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendes, Tiago Arouca
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Direito
topic Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Direito
description This study identifies and critically analyzes the evolution of stabilization clauses in international petroleum contracts entered between the Host Government (“HG”) and International Oil Companies (“IOCs”) with a focus on Mozambique. It then compares Mozambique’s stabilization provisions to those in three other African countries that have an active oil and gas industry. All four countries seek foreign investment in their oil and gas sectors. Foreign investors, in turn, seek to mitigate the many legal risks that arise in contracts signed with HGs as sovereigns. Investors look for stabilization and arbitration provisions in Petroleum Exploration & Production Contracts (“EPCs”) that increase the security of their investments. The article finds that Mozambique offers considerable security in its contracts compared to Angola, Ghana and Tanzania. Only Ghana offers a similar degree of stabilization in its contracts as Mozambique offers. The Angolan government does not resort to many of these stabilization mechanisms, probably because of the maturity of its petroleum industry, despite presenting quite a risky profile when compared to the other countries. Tanzania still has a long way to go in offering security to investors through stabilization clauses.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-22T08:50:05Z
2021-09-13
2021
2021-09-13T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/35087
TID:202763838
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/35087
identifier_str_mv TID:202763838
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132003427155968