Blended versus face-to-face: comparing student performance in a therapeutics class

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jesus, Ângelo
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Gomes, Maria João, Cruz, Agostinho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13846
Resumo: Therapeutics is a very complex subject for every pharmacy student, since it requires the application of knowledge from several other disciplines. The study of therapeutics is often done in case-based learning in order to promote reflective thinking and give a scenario as real as possible. The objective of this study was to compare student performance between faceto-face (n = 54) and blended learning (n = 56) approaches to the teaching of therapeutics. They can confirm that there are statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the final exam scores from both groups, being that the b learning group achieved higher scores. Blended learning seems to be an effective way to teach therapeutics, following pre established teaching methods, and above all, does not negatively affect student performance. It also provides new learning environments and strategies, and promotes the development of new skills such as learning and collaborating online, which may be relevant in a networked knowledge society.
id RCAP_a60a8842d511ec6479f48694ca3c1dac
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/13846
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Blended versus face-to-face: comparing student performance in a therapeutics classBiomedical educationComputer aided instructionTeachingPharmacy studentTherapeutics is a very complex subject for every pharmacy student, since it requires the application of knowledge from several other disciplines. The study of therapeutics is often done in case-based learning in order to promote reflective thinking and give a scenario as real as possible. The objective of this study was to compare student performance between faceto-face (n = 54) and blended learning (n = 56) approaches to the teaching of therapeutics. They can confirm that there are statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the final exam scores from both groups, being that the b learning group achieved higher scores. Blended learning seems to be an effective way to teach therapeutics, following pre established teaching methods, and above all, does not negatively affect student performance. It also provides new learning environments and strategies, and promotes the development of new skills such as learning and collaborating online, which may be relevant in a networked knowledge society.The Institution of Engineering and TechnologyRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoJesus, ÂngeloGomes, Maria JoãoCruz, Agostinho2019-06-05T15:16:15Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13846eng1751-880610.1049/iet-sen.2016.0190info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-13T12:56:11Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/13846Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:33:44.631736Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Blended versus face-to-face: comparing student performance in a therapeutics class
title Blended versus face-to-face: comparing student performance in a therapeutics class
spellingShingle Blended versus face-to-face: comparing student performance in a therapeutics class
Jesus, Ângelo
Biomedical education
Computer aided instruction
Teaching
Pharmacy student
title_short Blended versus face-to-face: comparing student performance in a therapeutics class
title_full Blended versus face-to-face: comparing student performance in a therapeutics class
title_fullStr Blended versus face-to-face: comparing student performance in a therapeutics class
title_full_unstemmed Blended versus face-to-face: comparing student performance in a therapeutics class
title_sort Blended versus face-to-face: comparing student performance in a therapeutics class
author Jesus, Ângelo
author_facet Jesus, Ângelo
Gomes, Maria João
Cruz, Agostinho
author_role author
author2 Gomes, Maria João
Cruz, Agostinho
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jesus, Ângelo
Gomes, Maria João
Cruz, Agostinho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biomedical education
Computer aided instruction
Teaching
Pharmacy student
topic Biomedical education
Computer aided instruction
Teaching
Pharmacy student
description Therapeutics is a very complex subject for every pharmacy student, since it requires the application of knowledge from several other disciplines. The study of therapeutics is often done in case-based learning in order to promote reflective thinking and give a scenario as real as possible. The objective of this study was to compare student performance between faceto-face (n = 54) and blended learning (n = 56) approaches to the teaching of therapeutics. They can confirm that there are statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the final exam scores from both groups, being that the b learning group achieved higher scores. Blended learning seems to be an effective way to teach therapeutics, following pre established teaching methods, and above all, does not negatively affect student performance. It also provides new learning environments and strategies, and promotes the development of new skills such as learning and collaborating online, which may be relevant in a networked knowledge society.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-06-05T15:16:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13846
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/13846
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1751-8806
10.1049/iet-sen.2016.0190
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv The Institution of Engineering and Technology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv The Institution of Engineering and Technology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131429513199616