Gaining competence in needle - knife fistulotomy - can I begin on my own?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes, Luís
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Mário Dinis, Gonçalves, Carla Rolanda Rocha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/45069
Resumo: BACKGROUND: While there are guidelines for appropriate training in ERCP, these are non-existent for needle-knife precut. The aim of this study was: (1) evaluate the experience curve of three endoscopists in needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF); (2) propose a minimum number of NKF procedures to attest proficiency. METHODS: Between November 1997 and March 2011, the first 120 consecutive NKF performed by three endoscopists (A, B, and C) were selected (360 patients) from three centers. Each group of 120 patients was chronologically ordered into three subgroups of 40.?The main outcomes were: NKF use, NKF success, and post-ERCP adverse events. RESULTS: The need for NKF did not decrease over time. The NKF success rate in the first attempt for endoscopist A and C in each of the three subgroups was 85?%/85?%, 87.5?%/87.5?%, and 87.5 %/90?%, respectively. Furthermore, both demonstrated a high NKF success in their initial 20 NKFs (85?% and 80?%, respectively). Endoscopist B however presented a different pattern as the success rate initiated at 60?%, then rose to 82.5?% and 85?% for the last group (P?=?0.03). Adverse events were mild (28 of the 32 occurrences) with no clear reduction with increased experience. CONCLUSIONS: A skillful endoscopist may expect to master NKF easily with few adverse events. While some endoscopists could begin on their own because of their innate skills, a minimal training is needed for all, as we cannot predict skills in advance. We propose a minimum of 20 NKF precuts to attest a trainee's competence in this procedure.
id RCAP_a60f0b796b76d583ca208dcacd0d1ac0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/45069
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Gaining competence in needle - knife fistulotomy - can I begin on my own?Science & TechnologyBACKGROUND: While there are guidelines for appropriate training in ERCP, these are non-existent for needle-knife precut. The aim of this study was: (1) evaluate the experience curve of three endoscopists in needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF); (2) propose a minimum number of NKF procedures to attest proficiency. METHODS: Between November 1997 and March 2011, the first 120 consecutive NKF performed by three endoscopists (A, B, and C) were selected (360 patients) from three centers. Each group of 120 patients was chronologically ordered into three subgroups of 40.?The main outcomes were: NKF use, NKF success, and post-ERCP adverse events. RESULTS: The need for NKF did not decrease over time. The NKF success rate in the first attempt for endoscopist A and C in each of the three subgroups was 85?%/85?%, 87.5?%/87.5?%, and 87.5 %/90?%, respectively. Furthermore, both demonstrated a high NKF success in their initial 20 NKFs (85?% and 80?%, respectively). Endoscopist B however presented a different pattern as the success rate initiated at 60?%, then rose to 82.5?% and 85?% for the last group (P?=?0.03). Adverse events were mild (28 of the 32 occurrences) with no clear reduction with increased experience. CONCLUSIONS: A skillful endoscopist may expect to master NKF easily with few adverse events. While some endoscopists could begin on their own because of their innate skills, a minimal training is needed for all, as we cannot predict skills in advance. We propose a minimum of 20 NKF precuts to attest a trainee's competence in this procedure.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionGeorg Thieme VerlagUniversidade do MinhoLopes, LuísRibeiro, Mário DinisGonçalves, Carla Rolanda Rocha2016-042016-04-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/45069eng2364-37222196-973610.1055/s-0041-109399https://www.thieme-connect.com/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-109399info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:28:28Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/45069Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:23:17.907143Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gaining competence in needle - knife fistulotomy - can I begin on my own?
title Gaining competence in needle - knife fistulotomy - can I begin on my own?
spellingShingle Gaining competence in needle - knife fistulotomy - can I begin on my own?
Lopes, Luís
Science & Technology
title_short Gaining competence in needle - knife fistulotomy - can I begin on my own?
title_full Gaining competence in needle - knife fistulotomy - can I begin on my own?
title_fullStr Gaining competence in needle - knife fistulotomy - can I begin on my own?
title_full_unstemmed Gaining competence in needle - knife fistulotomy - can I begin on my own?
title_sort Gaining competence in needle - knife fistulotomy - can I begin on my own?
author Lopes, Luís
author_facet Lopes, Luís
Ribeiro, Mário Dinis
Gonçalves, Carla Rolanda Rocha
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Mário Dinis
Gonçalves, Carla Rolanda Rocha
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes, Luís
Ribeiro, Mário Dinis
Gonçalves, Carla Rolanda Rocha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Science & Technology
topic Science & Technology
description BACKGROUND: While there are guidelines for appropriate training in ERCP, these are non-existent for needle-knife precut. The aim of this study was: (1) evaluate the experience curve of three endoscopists in needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF); (2) propose a minimum number of NKF procedures to attest proficiency. METHODS: Between November 1997 and March 2011, the first 120 consecutive NKF performed by three endoscopists (A, B, and C) were selected (360 patients) from three centers. Each group of 120 patients was chronologically ordered into three subgroups of 40.?The main outcomes were: NKF use, NKF success, and post-ERCP adverse events. RESULTS: The need for NKF did not decrease over time. The NKF success rate in the first attempt for endoscopist A and C in each of the three subgroups was 85?%/85?%, 87.5?%/87.5?%, and 87.5 %/90?%, respectively. Furthermore, both demonstrated a high NKF success in their initial 20 NKFs (85?% and 80?%, respectively). Endoscopist B however presented a different pattern as the success rate initiated at 60?%, then rose to 82.5?% and 85?% for the last group (P?=?0.03). Adverse events were mild (28 of the 32 occurrences) with no clear reduction with increased experience. CONCLUSIONS: A skillful endoscopist may expect to master NKF easily with few adverse events. While some endoscopists could begin on their own because of their innate skills, a minimal training is needed for all, as we cannot predict skills in advance. We propose a minimum of 20 NKF precuts to attest a trainee's competence in this procedure.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04
2016-04-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/45069
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/45069
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2364-3722
2196-9736
10.1055/s-0041-109399
https://www.thieme-connect.com/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-109399
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Georg Thieme Verlag
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Georg Thieme Verlag
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132706689253376