Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Magalhães, Pedro C.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Skiple, Jon K., Pereira, Miguel Maria, Arnesen, Sveinung, Bentsen, Henrik L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/61419
Resumo: How do people respond to different decision-making processes in high courts? One long-standing view suggests that citizens expect courts to be neutral arbiters of legal controversies. Although the relevance of such “myth of legality” has been challenged, we know very little about the relationship between the portrayals of the motives of courts and justices and public attitudes in civil law countries. We explore this question in a pair of experiments in Norway and Portugal where we isolate the effects of different institutional frames from outcome favorability. We find that while partisan frames are detrimental to fairness perceptions and acceptance of decisions, depictions of judicial decision-making that emphasize policy goals do not adversely affect citizens’ responses in comparison with legalistic frames. The results suggest that, even in civil law systems, preserving the myth of legality may not be a necessary condition to elicit public support for judicial decisions.
id RCAP_a6dcac1f32c4abb5b4a7102d576a7eb9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/61419
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europelaw and courtslaw and societypolitical psychologyexperimental researchHow do people respond to different decision-making processes in high courts? One long-standing view suggests that citizens expect courts to be neutral arbiters of legal controversies. Although the relevance of such “myth of legality” has been challenged, we know very little about the relationship between the portrayals of the motives of courts and justices and public attitudes in civil law countries. We explore this question in a pair of experiments in Norway and Portugal where we isolate the effects of different institutional frames from outcome favorability. We find that while partisan frames are detrimental to fairness perceptions and acceptance of decisions, depictions of judicial decision-making that emphasize policy goals do not adversely affect citizens’ responses in comparison with legalistic frames. The results suggest that, even in civil law systems, preserving the myth of legality may not be a necessary condition to elicit public support for judicial decisions.SageRepositório da Universidade de LisboaMagalhães, Pedro C.Skiple, Jon K.Pereira, Miguel MariaArnesen, SveinungBentsen, Henrik L.2023-12-18T15:45:08Z20232023-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/61419engMagalhães, P. C., Skiple, J. K., Pereira, M. M., Arnesen, S., Bentsen, H. L. (2023). Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 56 (10), 1537-1566.10.1177/00104140231152769info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-25T01:18:05Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/61419Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:56:05.656776Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe
title Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe
spellingShingle Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe
Magalhães, Pedro C.
law and courts
law and society
political psychology
experimental research
title_short Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe
title_full Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe
title_fullStr Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe
title_sort Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe
author Magalhães, Pedro C.
author_facet Magalhães, Pedro C.
Skiple, Jon K.
Pereira, Miguel Maria
Arnesen, Sveinung
Bentsen, Henrik L.
author_role author
author2 Skiple, Jon K.
Pereira, Miguel Maria
Arnesen, Sveinung
Bentsen, Henrik L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Magalhães, Pedro C.
Skiple, Jon K.
Pereira, Miguel Maria
Arnesen, Sveinung
Bentsen, Henrik L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv law and courts
law and society
political psychology
experimental research
topic law and courts
law and society
political psychology
experimental research
description How do people respond to different decision-making processes in high courts? One long-standing view suggests that citizens expect courts to be neutral arbiters of legal controversies. Although the relevance of such “myth of legality” has been challenged, we know very little about the relationship between the portrayals of the motives of courts and justices and public attitudes in civil law countries. We explore this question in a pair of experiments in Norway and Portugal where we isolate the effects of different institutional frames from outcome favorability. We find that while partisan frames are detrimental to fairness perceptions and acceptance of decisions, depictions of judicial decision-making that emphasize policy goals do not adversely affect citizens’ responses in comparison with legalistic frames. The results suggest that, even in civil law systems, preserving the myth of legality may not be a necessary condition to elicit public support for judicial decisions.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-18T15:45:08Z
2023
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10451/61419
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/61419
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Magalhães, P. C., Skiple, J. K., Pereira, M. M., Arnesen, S., Bentsen, H. L. (2023). Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 56 (10), 1537-1566.
10.1177/00104140231152769
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sage
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sage
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136446734401536