Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Azevedo, Andreia S.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Sousa, Inês M., Fernandes, R., Azevedo, Nuno F., Almeida, Carina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/60589
Resumo: Despite the successful application of LNA/2OMe-FISH procedures for bacteria detection, there is a lack of knowledge on the properties that affect hybridization. Such information is crucial for the rational design of protocols. Hence, this work aimed to evaluate the effect of three essential factors on the LNA/2OMe hybridization stephybridization temperature, NaCl concentration and type and concentration of denaturant (formamide, ethylene carbonate and urea). This optimization was performed for 3 Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Citrobacter freundii) and 2 Gram-positive bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis), employing the response surface methodology and a Eubacteria probe. In general, it was observed that a high NaCl concentration is beneficial (from 2 M to 5 M), regardless of the denaturant used. Urea, formamide and ethylene carbonate are suitable denaturants for LNA/2OMe-FISH applications; but urea provides higher fluorescence intensities among the different bacteria, especially for gram-positive bacteria and for P. aeruginosa. However, a unique optimal protocol was not found for all tested bacteria. Despite this, the results indicate that a hybridization solution with 2 M of urea and 4 M of NaCl would be a proper starting point. Furthermore, a hybridization temperature around 62°C, for 14 bp probes with LNA monomers at every third position of 2?OMe and 64% of GC content, should be use in initial optimization of new LNA/2OMe-FISH protocols.
id RCAP_a759804752aff49ebeb33daf5b69b30f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/60589
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detectionScience & TechnologyDespite the successful application of LNA/2OMe-FISH procedures for bacteria detection, there is a lack of knowledge on the properties that affect hybridization. Such information is crucial for the rational design of protocols. Hence, this work aimed to evaluate the effect of three essential factors on the LNA/2OMe hybridization stephybridization temperature, NaCl concentration and type and concentration of denaturant (formamide, ethylene carbonate and urea). This optimization was performed for 3 Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Citrobacter freundii) and 2 Gram-positive bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis), employing the response surface methodology and a Eubacteria probe. In general, it was observed that a high NaCl concentration is beneficial (from 2 M to 5 M), regardless of the denaturant used. Urea, formamide and ethylene carbonate are suitable denaturants for LNA/2OMe-FISH applications; but urea provides higher fluorescence intensities among the different bacteria, especially for gram-positive bacteria and for P. aeruginosa. However, a unique optimal protocol was not found for all tested bacteria. Despite this, the results indicate that a hybridization solution with 2 M of urea and 4 M of NaCl would be a proper starting point. Furthermore, a hybridization temperature around 62°C, for 14 bp probes with LNA monomers at every third position of 2?OMe and 64% of GC content, should be use in initial optimization of new LNA/2OMe-FISH protocols.This work was financially supportedby project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006939 (Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy – UID/EQU/00511/2013),POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684 (Center of Biological Engineering - UID/BIO/04469) funded by EuropeanRegional Development Fund (ERDF) through COMPETE2020– Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI), and by national funds (PIDDAC) through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia/MCTES; NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004- BioTecNorte operation,funded by the EuropeanRegional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020 Programa Operacional Regional do Norte; PostDoctoral Fellowship SFRH/BPD/121601/2016 (Andreia S. Azevedo) and PhD Fellowship SFRH/ BD/118860/2016 (Ricardo M. Fernandes) supportedby national funds throughFCT Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Project PTDC/DTP-PIC/4562/2014 – POCI-01-0145FEDER-016678 (Coded-FISH) and Project POCI01-0145-FEDER-030431(CLASInVivo), funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020- Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and by national funds through FCT Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublic Library of ScienceUniversidade do MinhoAzevedo, Andreia S.Sousa, Inês M.Fernandes, R.Azevedo, Nuno F.Almeida, Carina2019-05-312019-05-31T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/60589engAzevedo, Andreia S.; Sousa, Inês M.; Fernandes, R.; Azevedo, Nuno F.; Almeida, Carina, Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection. PLoS One, 14(5), e0217689, 20191932-62031932-620310.1371/journal.pone.021768931150460http://journals.plos.org/plosone/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:29:49Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/60589Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:24:52.095228Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
title Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
spellingShingle Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
Azevedo, Andreia S.
Science & Technology
title_short Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
title_full Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
title_fullStr Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
title_sort Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection
author Azevedo, Andreia S.
author_facet Azevedo, Andreia S.
Sousa, Inês M.
Fernandes, R.
Azevedo, Nuno F.
Almeida, Carina
author_role author
author2 Sousa, Inês M.
Fernandes, R.
Azevedo, Nuno F.
Almeida, Carina
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Azevedo, Andreia S.
Sousa, Inês M.
Fernandes, R.
Azevedo, Nuno F.
Almeida, Carina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Science & Technology
topic Science & Technology
description Despite the successful application of LNA/2OMe-FISH procedures for bacteria detection, there is a lack of knowledge on the properties that affect hybridization. Such information is crucial for the rational design of protocols. Hence, this work aimed to evaluate the effect of three essential factors on the LNA/2OMe hybridization stephybridization temperature, NaCl concentration and type and concentration of denaturant (formamide, ethylene carbonate and urea). This optimization was performed for 3 Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Citrobacter freundii) and 2 Gram-positive bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis), employing the response surface methodology and a Eubacteria probe. In general, it was observed that a high NaCl concentration is beneficial (from 2 M to 5 M), regardless of the denaturant used. Urea, formamide and ethylene carbonate are suitable denaturants for LNA/2OMe-FISH applications; but urea provides higher fluorescence intensities among the different bacteria, especially for gram-positive bacteria and for P. aeruginosa. However, a unique optimal protocol was not found for all tested bacteria. Despite this, the results indicate that a hybridization solution with 2 M of urea and 4 M of NaCl would be a proper starting point. Furthermore, a hybridization temperature around 62°C, for 14 bp probes with LNA monomers at every third position of 2?OMe and 64% of GC content, should be use in initial optimization of new LNA/2OMe-FISH protocols.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-31
2019-05-31T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/60589
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/60589
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Azevedo, Andreia S.; Sousa, Inês M.; Fernandes, R.; Azevedo, Nuno F.; Almeida, Carina, Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection. PLoS One, 14(5), e0217689, 2019
1932-6203
1932-6203
10.1371/journal.pone.0217689
31150460
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library of Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library of Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132730294796288