Comparative complete scheme and booster effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines in preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infections with SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants: A case–case study based on electronic health records

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kislaya, Irina
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Peralta‐Santos, André, Borges, Vítor, Vieira, Luís, Sousa, Carlos, Ferreira, Bibiana, Pelerito, Ana, Gomes, João Paulo, Leite, Pedro Pinto, Nunes, Baltazar, Machado, Ausenda, Rodrigues, Ana Paula, Peixoto, Vasco Ricoca, Casaca, Pedro, Fernandes, Eugenia, Rodrigues, Eduardo, Ferreira, Rita, Isidro, Joana, Pinto, Miguel, Duarte, Sílvia, Santos, Daniela, Meneses, Luís, Almeida, José Pedro, Matias, Ana, Freire, Samanta, Grilo, Teresa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19428
Resumo: Background: Information on vaccine effectiveness in a context of novel variants of concern (VOC) emergence is of key importance to inform public health policies. This study aimed to estimate a measure of comparative vaccine effectiveness between Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2 and sub-lineages) VOC according to vaccination exposure (primary or booster). Methods: We developed a case–case study using data on RT-PCR SARS-CoV2-positive cases notified in Portugal during Weeks 49–51, 2021. To obtain measure of comparative vaccine effectiveness, we compared the odds of vaccination in Omicron cases versus Delta using logistic regression adjusted for age group, sex, region, week of diagnosis, and laboratory of origin. Results: Higher odds of vaccination were observed in cases infected by Omicron VOC compared with Delta VOC cases for both complete primary vaccination (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 2.4) and booster dose (OR = 5.2; 95% CI: 3.1 to 8.8), equivalent to reduction of vaccine effectiveness from 44.7% and 92.8%, observed against infection with Delta, to 6.0% (95% CI: 29.2% to 12.7%) and 62.7% (95% CI: 35.7% to 77.9%), observed against infection with Omicron, for complete primary vaccination and booster dose, respectively. Conclusion: Consistent reduction in vaccine-induced protection against infection with Omicron was observed. Complete primary vaccination may not be protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection in regions where Omicron variant is dominant.
id RCAP_a765191a41f1b6ab2cbdb83744f975c1
oai_identifier_str oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/19428
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparative complete scheme and booster effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines in preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infections with SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants: A case–case study based on electronic health recordsCase–case designCOVID-19Delta variantOmicron variantSARS-CoV-2VaccineeffectivenessBackground: Information on vaccine effectiveness in a context of novel variants of concern (VOC) emergence is of key importance to inform public health policies. This study aimed to estimate a measure of comparative vaccine effectiveness between Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2 and sub-lineages) VOC according to vaccination exposure (primary or booster). Methods: We developed a case–case study using data on RT-PCR SARS-CoV2-positive cases notified in Portugal during Weeks 49–51, 2021. To obtain measure of comparative vaccine effectiveness, we compared the odds of vaccination in Omicron cases versus Delta using logistic regression adjusted for age group, sex, region, week of diagnosis, and laboratory of origin. Results: Higher odds of vaccination were observed in cases infected by Omicron VOC compared with Delta VOC cases for both complete primary vaccination (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 2.4) and booster dose (OR = 5.2; 95% CI: 3.1 to 8.8), equivalent to reduction of vaccine effectiveness from 44.7% and 92.8%, observed against infection with Delta, to 6.0% (95% CI: 29.2% to 12.7%) and 62.7% (95% CI: 35.7% to 77.9%), observed against infection with Omicron, for complete primary vaccination and booster dose, respectively. Conclusion: Consistent reduction in vaccine-induced protection against infection with Omicron was observed. Complete primary vaccination may not be protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection in regions where Omicron variant is dominant.Grant no. 2021/PHF/23776; POCI-01-0145-FEDER-022184; Project ALG-D2-2021-06WileySapientiaKislaya, IrinaPeralta‐Santos, AndréBorges, VítorVieira, LuísSousa, CarlosFerreira, BibianaPelerito, AnaGomes, João PauloLeite, Pedro PintoNunes, BaltazarMachado, AusendaRodrigues, Ana PaulaPeixoto, Vasco RicocaCasaca, PedroFernandes, EugeniaRodrigues, EduardoFerreira, RitaIsidro, JoanaPinto, MiguelDuarte, SílviaSantos, DanielaMeneses, LuísAlmeida, José PedroMatias, AnaFreire, SamantaGrilo, Teresa2023-04-11T10:30:46Z20232023-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19428eng1750-264010.1111/irv.13121info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-24T10:31:54Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/19428Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:09:04.116081Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative complete scheme and booster effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines in preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infections with SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants: A case–case study based on electronic health records
title Comparative complete scheme and booster effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines in preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infections with SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants: A case–case study based on electronic health records
spellingShingle Comparative complete scheme and booster effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines in preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infections with SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants: A case–case study based on electronic health records
Kislaya, Irina
Case–case design
COVID-19
Delta variant
Omicron variant
SARS-CoV-2
Vaccineeffectiveness
title_short Comparative complete scheme and booster effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines in preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infections with SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants: A case–case study based on electronic health records
title_full Comparative complete scheme and booster effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines in preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infections with SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants: A case–case study based on electronic health records
title_fullStr Comparative complete scheme and booster effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines in preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infections with SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants: A case–case study based on electronic health records
title_full_unstemmed Comparative complete scheme and booster effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines in preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infections with SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants: A case–case study based on electronic health records
title_sort Comparative complete scheme and booster effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines in preventing SARS‐CoV‐2 infections with SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants: A case–case study based on electronic health records
author Kislaya, Irina
author_facet Kislaya, Irina
Peralta‐Santos, André
Borges, Vítor
Vieira, Luís
Sousa, Carlos
Ferreira, Bibiana
Pelerito, Ana
Gomes, João Paulo
Leite, Pedro Pinto
Nunes, Baltazar
Machado, Ausenda
Rodrigues, Ana Paula
Peixoto, Vasco Ricoca
Casaca, Pedro
Fernandes, Eugenia
Rodrigues, Eduardo
Ferreira, Rita
Isidro, Joana
Pinto, Miguel
Duarte, Sílvia
Santos, Daniela
Meneses, Luís
Almeida, José Pedro
Matias, Ana
Freire, Samanta
Grilo, Teresa
author_role author
author2 Peralta‐Santos, André
Borges, Vítor
Vieira, Luís
Sousa, Carlos
Ferreira, Bibiana
Pelerito, Ana
Gomes, João Paulo
Leite, Pedro Pinto
Nunes, Baltazar
Machado, Ausenda
Rodrigues, Ana Paula
Peixoto, Vasco Ricoca
Casaca, Pedro
Fernandes, Eugenia
Rodrigues, Eduardo
Ferreira, Rita
Isidro, Joana
Pinto, Miguel
Duarte, Sílvia
Santos, Daniela
Meneses, Luís
Almeida, José Pedro
Matias, Ana
Freire, Samanta
Grilo, Teresa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sapientia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kislaya, Irina
Peralta‐Santos, André
Borges, Vítor
Vieira, Luís
Sousa, Carlos
Ferreira, Bibiana
Pelerito, Ana
Gomes, João Paulo
Leite, Pedro Pinto
Nunes, Baltazar
Machado, Ausenda
Rodrigues, Ana Paula
Peixoto, Vasco Ricoca
Casaca, Pedro
Fernandes, Eugenia
Rodrigues, Eduardo
Ferreira, Rita
Isidro, Joana
Pinto, Miguel
Duarte, Sílvia
Santos, Daniela
Meneses, Luís
Almeida, José Pedro
Matias, Ana
Freire, Samanta
Grilo, Teresa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Case–case design
COVID-19
Delta variant
Omicron variant
SARS-CoV-2
Vaccineeffectiveness
topic Case–case design
COVID-19
Delta variant
Omicron variant
SARS-CoV-2
Vaccineeffectiveness
description Background: Information on vaccine effectiveness in a context of novel variants of concern (VOC) emergence is of key importance to inform public health policies. This study aimed to estimate a measure of comparative vaccine effectiveness between Omicron (BA.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2 and sub-lineages) VOC according to vaccination exposure (primary or booster). Methods: We developed a case–case study using data on RT-PCR SARS-CoV2-positive cases notified in Portugal during Weeks 49–51, 2021. To obtain measure of comparative vaccine effectiveness, we compared the odds of vaccination in Omicron cases versus Delta using logistic regression adjusted for age group, sex, region, week of diagnosis, and laboratory of origin. Results: Higher odds of vaccination were observed in cases infected by Omicron VOC compared with Delta VOC cases for both complete primary vaccination (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 2.4) and booster dose (OR = 5.2; 95% CI: 3.1 to 8.8), equivalent to reduction of vaccine effectiveness from 44.7% and 92.8%, observed against infection with Delta, to 6.0% (95% CI: 29.2% to 12.7%) and 62.7% (95% CI: 35.7% to 77.9%), observed against infection with Omicron, for complete primary vaccination and booster dose, respectively. Conclusion: Consistent reduction in vaccine-induced protection against infection with Omicron was observed. Complete primary vaccination may not be protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection in regions where Omicron variant is dominant.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-11T10:30:46Z
2023
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19428
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/19428
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1750-2640
10.1111/irv.13121
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133337332219904