Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha-e-Sá, Maria A.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Dietrich, Til, Faria, Ana, Nunes,  Luis Catela, Ortigão, Margarida, Rosa, Renato, Vieira Da Silva, Carina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/149241
Resumo: The effect of the payment vehicle (PV) on economic valuation estimates has been addressed since the early literature on stated preferences studies. Particularly, some studies have focused on willingness to pay (WTP) sensitivity to mandatory/collective vs. voluntary/individual PVs, by comparing tax increases or redistribution based on specific taxes with donation-like contributions. These two payment schemes may induce different types of strategic behavior and eventually free riding by the economic agents involved. We conducted a choice experiment through a face-to-face survey held in 2020 for a representative sample of the Portuguese population. We investigate the national population’s WTP to invest in oil spills’ prevention along the coastline of mainland Portugal to ensure the provision of four marine and coastal ecosystem services (MCES): (1) biodiversity conservation, (2) beach use, (3) coastal protection and (4) surf. We used a split-sample design to test for differences between the two PVs considered, a mandatory income tax and a voluntary contribution collected through a crowdfunding campaign. We estimate a mixed logit model (MXL) in WTP-space. Furthermore, we control for several sociodemographic characteristics to capture the influence of respondents’ heterogeneity on the elicited WTP, and to check the robustness of our results. We find that mean WTP estimates are positive and significant for all ES except for surf. Biodiversity conservation has the highest WTP estimate. The results obtained suggest that the lack of trust in institutions, fairness concerns and disbelief in policy consequentiality seem to be intrinsic to the Portuguese population, influencing WTP regardless of the PV. However, when comparing an extra income tax with a crowdfunding campaign, respondents have a lower preference for the status quo in this latter case. Therefore, our results highlight the importance of better understanding the role that the payment vehicle may play in funding ecosystem services’ conservation. This is important since how populations respond to incentives for sustainability purposes is crucial to ensure that the targets are met in a more efficient (or cost-effective) and equitable way.
id RCAP_a7f08b50d106fd8acbc0ae0fc56b4a2b
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/149241
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?Discrete choice experimentOil spillsMarine and costal ecosystem services (MCES)Payment vehicle AcknowledgementsThe effect of the payment vehicle (PV) on economic valuation estimates has been addressed since the early literature on stated preferences studies. Particularly, some studies have focused on willingness to pay (WTP) sensitivity to mandatory/collective vs. voluntary/individual PVs, by comparing tax increases or redistribution based on specific taxes with donation-like contributions. These two payment schemes may induce different types of strategic behavior and eventually free riding by the economic agents involved. We conducted a choice experiment through a face-to-face survey held in 2020 for a representative sample of the Portuguese population. We investigate the national population’s WTP to invest in oil spills’ prevention along the coastline of mainland Portugal to ensure the provision of four marine and coastal ecosystem services (MCES): (1) biodiversity conservation, (2) beach use, (3) coastal protection and (4) surf. We used a split-sample design to test for differences between the two PVs considered, a mandatory income tax and a voluntary contribution collected through a crowdfunding campaign. We estimate a mixed logit model (MXL) in WTP-space. Furthermore, we control for several sociodemographic characteristics to capture the influence of respondents’ heterogeneity on the elicited WTP, and to check the robustness of our results. We find that mean WTP estimates are positive and significant for all ES except for surf. Biodiversity conservation has the highest WTP estimate. The results obtained suggest that the lack of trust in institutions, fairness concerns and disbelief in policy consequentiality seem to be intrinsic to the Portuguese population, influencing WTP regardless of the PV. However, when comparing an extra income tax with a crowdfunding campaign, respondents have a lower preference for the status quo in this latter case. Therefore, our results highlight the importance of better understanding the role that the payment vehicle may play in funding ecosystem services’ conservation. This is important since how populations respond to incentives for sustainability purposes is crucial to ensure that the targets are met in a more efficient (or cost-effective) and equitable way.Nova School of Business and EconomicsRUNCunha-e-Sá, Maria A.Dietrich, TilFaria, AnaNunes,  Luis CatelaOrtigão, MargaridaRosa, RenatoVieira Da Silva, Carina2023-02-15T19:51:45Z2023-012023-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/149241engCunha-e-Sá, Maria Antonieta, Dietrich, Til, Faria, Ana, Nunes, Luis C., Ortigão, Margarida, Rosa, Renato, Vieira-da-Silva, Carina. Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?. (January 2023) Nova SBE Working Paper Series No. 657info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T05:31:09Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/149241Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:53:40.762439Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?
title Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?
spellingShingle Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?
Cunha-e-Sá, Maria A.
Discrete choice experiment
Oil spills
Marine and costal ecosystem services (MCES)
Payment vehicle Acknowledgements
title_short Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?
title_full Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?
title_fullStr Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?
title_full_unstemmed Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?
title_sort Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?
author Cunha-e-Sá, Maria A.
author_facet Cunha-e-Sá, Maria A.
Dietrich, Til
Faria, Ana
Nunes,  Luis Catela
Ortigão, Margarida
Rosa, Renato
Vieira Da Silva, Carina
author_role author
author2 Dietrich, Til
Faria, Ana
Nunes,  Luis Catela
Ortigão, Margarida
Rosa, Renato
Vieira Da Silva, Carina
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha-e-Sá, Maria A.
Dietrich, Til
Faria, Ana
Nunes,  Luis Catela
Ortigão, Margarida
Rosa, Renato
Vieira Da Silva, Carina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Discrete choice experiment
Oil spills
Marine and costal ecosystem services (MCES)
Payment vehicle Acknowledgements
topic Discrete choice experiment
Oil spills
Marine and costal ecosystem services (MCES)
Payment vehicle Acknowledgements
description The effect of the payment vehicle (PV) on economic valuation estimates has been addressed since the early literature on stated preferences studies. Particularly, some studies have focused on willingness to pay (WTP) sensitivity to mandatory/collective vs. voluntary/individual PVs, by comparing tax increases or redistribution based on specific taxes with donation-like contributions. These two payment schemes may induce different types of strategic behavior and eventually free riding by the economic agents involved. We conducted a choice experiment through a face-to-face survey held in 2020 for a representative sample of the Portuguese population. We investigate the national population’s WTP to invest in oil spills’ prevention along the coastline of mainland Portugal to ensure the provision of four marine and coastal ecosystem services (MCES): (1) biodiversity conservation, (2) beach use, (3) coastal protection and (4) surf. We used a split-sample design to test for differences between the two PVs considered, a mandatory income tax and a voluntary contribution collected through a crowdfunding campaign. We estimate a mixed logit model (MXL) in WTP-space. Furthermore, we control for several sociodemographic characteristics to capture the influence of respondents’ heterogeneity on the elicited WTP, and to check the robustness of our results. We find that mean WTP estimates are positive and significant for all ES except for surf. Biodiversity conservation has the highest WTP estimate. The results obtained suggest that the lack of trust in institutions, fairness concerns and disbelief in policy consequentiality seem to be intrinsic to the Portuguese population, influencing WTP regardless of the PV. However, when comparing an extra income tax with a crowdfunding campaign, respondents have a lower preference for the status quo in this latter case. Therefore, our results highlight the importance of better understanding the role that the payment vehicle may play in funding ecosystem services’ conservation. This is important since how populations respond to incentives for sustainability purposes is crucial to ensure that the targets are met in a more efficient (or cost-effective) and equitable way.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-15T19:51:45Z
2023-01
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/149241
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/149241
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Cunha-e-Sá, Maria Antonieta, Dietrich, Til, Faria, Ana, Nunes, Luis C., Ortigão, Margarida, Rosa, Renato, Vieira-da-Silva, Carina. Crowdfunding vs. Taxes: Does the payment vehicle influence WTP for Ecosystem Services protection?. (January 2023) Nova SBE Working Paper Series No. 657
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nova School of Business and Economics
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nova School of Business and Economics
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138127239970816