Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levels

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paz, Maria Catarina
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Castanheira, Nádia Luísa, Paz, Ana Marta, Gonçalves, Maria Conceição, Santos, Fernando Monteiro, Farzamian, Mohammad
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/50101
Resumo: Electromagnetic induction (EMI) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) are geophysical techniques measuring soil electrical conductivity and providing insights into properties correlated with it to depths of several meters. EMI measures the apparent electrical conductivity (ECa, dS m−1) without physical contact, while ERT acquires apparent electrical resistivity (ERa, ohm m) using electrodes. Both involve mathematical inversion to obtain models of spatial distribution for soil electrical conductivity (σ, mS m−1) and electrical resistivity (ρ, ohm m), respectively, where ρ is the reciprocal of σ. Soil salinity can be assessed from σ over large areas using a calibration process consisting of a regression between σ and the electrical conductivity of the saturated soil paste extract (ECe, dS m−1), used as a proxy for soil salinity. This research aims to compare the prediction abilities of the faster EMI to the more reliable ERT for estimating σ and predicting soil salinity. The study conducted surveys and sampling at four locations with distinct salinity levels in Portugal, analysing the agreement between the techniques, and obtained 2D vertical soil salinity maps. In our case study, the agreement between EMI and ERT models was fairly good in three locations, with σ varying between 50 and 500 mS m−1. However, this was not the case at location 4, where σ exceeded 1000 mS m−1 and EMI significantly underestimated σ when compared to ERT. As for soil salinity prediction, both techniques generally provided satisfactory and comparable regional-level predictions of ECe, and the observed underestimation in EMI models did not significantly affect the overall estimation of soil salinity. Consequently, EMI demonstrated an acceptable level of accuracy in comparison to ERT in our case studies, supporting confidence in utilizing this faster and more practical technique for measuring soil salinity over large areas
id RCAP_a89932721dd22db63953bf028977216f
oai_identifier_str oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/50101
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levelsElectromagnetic induction (EMI) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) are geophysical techniques measuring soil electrical conductivity and providing insights into properties correlated with it to depths of several meters. EMI measures the apparent electrical conductivity (ECa, dS m−1) without physical contact, while ERT acquires apparent electrical resistivity (ERa, ohm m) using electrodes. Both involve mathematical inversion to obtain models of spatial distribution for soil electrical conductivity (σ, mS m−1) and electrical resistivity (ρ, ohm m), respectively, where ρ is the reciprocal of σ. Soil salinity can be assessed from σ over large areas using a calibration process consisting of a regression between σ and the electrical conductivity of the saturated soil paste extract (ECe, dS m−1), used as a proxy for soil salinity. This research aims to compare the prediction abilities of the faster EMI to the more reliable ERT for estimating σ and predicting soil salinity. The study conducted surveys and sampling at four locations with distinct salinity levels in Portugal, analysing the agreement between the techniques, and obtained 2D vertical soil salinity maps. In our case study, the agreement between EMI and ERT models was fairly good in three locations, with σ varying between 50 and 500 mS m−1. However, this was not the case at location 4, where σ exceeded 1000 mS m−1 and EMI significantly underestimated σ when compared to ERT. As for soil salinity prediction, both techniques generally provided satisfactory and comparable regional-level predictions of ECe, and the observed underestimation in EMI models did not significantly affect the overall estimation of soil salinity. Consequently, EMI demonstrated an acceptable level of accuracy in comparison to ERT in our case studies, supporting confidence in utilizing this faster and more practical technique for measuring soil salinity over large areasRepositório ComumPaz, Maria CatarinaCastanheira, Nádia LuísaPaz, Ana MartaGonçalves, Maria ConceiçãoSantos, Fernando MonteiroFarzamian, Mohammad2024-02-29T12:31:43Z20242024-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/50101engPaz, M.C., Castanheira, N.L., Paz, A.M., Gonçalves, M.C., Monteiro Santos, F., & Farzamian, M. (2024). Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levels. Land, 13, 2952073-445Xhttps://doi.org/10.3390/land13030295info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-03T03:15:57Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/50101Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:12:24.400594Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levels
title Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levels
spellingShingle Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levels
Paz, Maria Catarina
title_short Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levels
title_full Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levels
title_fullStr Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levels
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levels
title_sort Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levels
author Paz, Maria Catarina
author_facet Paz, Maria Catarina
Castanheira, Nádia Luísa
Paz, Ana Marta
Gonçalves, Maria Conceição
Santos, Fernando Monteiro
Farzamian, Mohammad
author_role author
author2 Castanheira, Nádia Luísa
Paz, Ana Marta
Gonçalves, Maria Conceição
Santos, Fernando Monteiro
Farzamian, Mohammad
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Comum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paz, Maria Catarina
Castanheira, Nádia Luísa
Paz, Ana Marta
Gonçalves, Maria Conceição
Santos, Fernando Monteiro
Farzamian, Mohammad
description Electromagnetic induction (EMI) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) are geophysical techniques measuring soil electrical conductivity and providing insights into properties correlated with it to depths of several meters. EMI measures the apparent electrical conductivity (ECa, dS m−1) without physical contact, while ERT acquires apparent electrical resistivity (ERa, ohm m) using electrodes. Both involve mathematical inversion to obtain models of spatial distribution for soil electrical conductivity (σ, mS m−1) and electrical resistivity (ρ, ohm m), respectively, where ρ is the reciprocal of σ. Soil salinity can be assessed from σ over large areas using a calibration process consisting of a regression between σ and the electrical conductivity of the saturated soil paste extract (ECe, dS m−1), used as a proxy for soil salinity. This research aims to compare the prediction abilities of the faster EMI to the more reliable ERT for estimating σ and predicting soil salinity. The study conducted surveys and sampling at four locations with distinct salinity levels in Portugal, analysing the agreement between the techniques, and obtained 2D vertical soil salinity maps. In our case study, the agreement between EMI and ERT models was fairly good in three locations, with σ varying between 50 and 500 mS m−1. However, this was not the case at location 4, where σ exceeded 1000 mS m−1 and EMI significantly underestimated σ when compared to ERT. As for soil salinity prediction, both techniques generally provided satisfactory and comparable regional-level predictions of ECe, and the observed underestimation in EMI models did not significantly affect the overall estimation of soil salinity. Consequently, EMI demonstrated an acceptable level of accuracy in comparison to ERT in our case studies, supporting confidence in utilizing this faster and more practical technique for measuring soil salinity over large areas
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-29T12:31:43Z
2024
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/50101
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/50101
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Paz, M.C., Castanheira, N.L., Paz, A.M., Gonçalves, M.C., Monteiro Santos, F., & Farzamian, M. (2024). Comparison of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography in assessing soil salinity: Insights from four plots with distinct soil salinity levels. Land, 13, 295
2073-445X
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13030295
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137773276364800