Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2028 |
Resumo: | Background: We evaluated whether different personal responsibilities should influence the allocation healthcare resources and whether attitudes toward the penalization of risk behaviours vary among individual’s sociodemographic characteristics and health related habits. Study design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: We developed an online survey and made it available on various social networks for six months, during 2015. The sample covered the population aged 18 yr and older living in Portugal and we got 296 valid answers. Respondents faced four lifestyle choices: smoking, consumption of alcoholic beverages, unhealthy diet and illegal drug use, and should decide whether each one is relevant when establishing healthcare priorities. Logistic regressions were used to explore the relation of respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics and health related behaviours in the likelihood of agreeing with the patients engaged in risky behaviour deserve a lower priority. Results: Using illegal drugs was the behaviour most penalized (65.5%) followed by heavy drinkers (61.5%) and smoking (51.0%). The slight penalization was the unhealthy dieting (29.7%). The sociodemographic characteristics had different impact in penalization of the risks’ behaviours. Moreover, the respondents who support the idea that unhealthy lifestyles should have a lower priority, all strongly agreed that the smoking habit (OR=36.05; 95% CI: 8.72, 149.12), the unhealthy diets (OR=12.87; 95% CI: 3.21, 51.53), drink alcohol in excess (OR=20.51; 95% CI: 12.09, 85.46) and illegal drug use (OR=73.21; 95% CI: 9.78, 97.83) must have a lower priority in the access to healthcare. Conclusions: The respondents accept the notion of rationing healthcare based on lifestyles. |
id |
RCAP_aabc2d91b42705242550b372468caed5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/2028 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese surveyRationing healthcareRisk behavioursHealth responsibilityPriority settingPortugalBackground: We evaluated whether different personal responsibilities should influence the allocation healthcare resources and whether attitudes toward the penalization of risk behaviours vary among individual’s sociodemographic characteristics and health related habits. Study design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: We developed an online survey and made it available on various social networks for six months, during 2015. The sample covered the population aged 18 yr and older living in Portugal and we got 296 valid answers. Respondents faced four lifestyle choices: smoking, consumption of alcoholic beverages, unhealthy diet and illegal drug use, and should decide whether each one is relevant when establishing healthcare priorities. Logistic regressions were used to explore the relation of respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics and health related behaviours in the likelihood of agreeing with the patients engaged in risky behaviour deserve a lower priority. Results: Using illegal drugs was the behaviour most penalized (65.5%) followed by heavy drinkers (61.5%) and smoking (51.0%). The slight penalization was the unhealthy dieting (29.7%). The sociodemographic characteristics had different impact in penalization of the risks’ behaviours. Moreover, the respondents who support the idea that unhealthy lifestyles should have a lower priority, all strongly agreed that the smoking habit (OR=36.05; 95% CI: 8.72, 149.12), the unhealthy diets (OR=12.87; 95% CI: 3.21, 51.53), drink alcohol in excess (OR=20.51; 95% CI: 12.09, 85.46) and illegal drug use (OR=73.21; 95% CI: 9.78, 97.83) must have a lower priority in the access to healthcare. Conclusions: The respondents accept the notion of rationing healthcare based on lifestyles.2017-12-19T16:49:23Z2017-12-192017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfBorges, A. P., & Pinho, M. (2017). Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey. Journal of Research in Health Sciences, 17(4), 1-7. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2028http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2028Borges, A. P., & Pinho, M. (2017). Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey. Journal of Research in Health Sciences, 17(4), 1-7. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2028http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2028enghttp://journals.umsha.ac.ir/index.php/JRHS/article/view/3554http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorges, Ana PintoPinho, Micaelareponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-16T02:01:26Zoai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/2028Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:38:21.988950Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey |
title |
Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey |
spellingShingle |
Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey Borges, Ana Pinto Rationing healthcare Risk behaviours Health responsibility Priority setting Portugal |
title_short |
Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey |
title_full |
Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey |
title_fullStr |
Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey |
title_full_unstemmed |
Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey |
title_sort |
Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey |
author |
Borges, Ana Pinto |
author_facet |
Borges, Ana Pinto Pinho, Micaela |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pinho, Micaela |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borges, Ana Pinto Pinho, Micaela |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rationing healthcare Risk behaviours Health responsibility Priority setting Portugal |
topic |
Rationing healthcare Risk behaviours Health responsibility Priority setting Portugal |
description |
Background: We evaluated whether different personal responsibilities should influence the allocation healthcare resources and whether attitudes toward the penalization of risk behaviours vary among individual’s sociodemographic characteristics and health related habits. Study design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: We developed an online survey and made it available on various social networks for six months, during 2015. The sample covered the population aged 18 yr and older living in Portugal and we got 296 valid answers. Respondents faced four lifestyle choices: smoking, consumption of alcoholic beverages, unhealthy diet and illegal drug use, and should decide whether each one is relevant when establishing healthcare priorities. Logistic regressions were used to explore the relation of respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics and health related behaviours in the likelihood of agreeing with the patients engaged in risky behaviour deserve a lower priority. Results: Using illegal drugs was the behaviour most penalized (65.5%) followed by heavy drinkers (61.5%) and smoking (51.0%). The slight penalization was the unhealthy dieting (29.7%). The sociodemographic characteristics had different impact in penalization of the risks’ behaviours. Moreover, the respondents who support the idea that unhealthy lifestyles should have a lower priority, all strongly agreed that the smoking habit (OR=36.05; 95% CI: 8.72, 149.12), the unhealthy diets (OR=12.87; 95% CI: 3.21, 51.53), drink alcohol in excess (OR=20.51; 95% CI: 12.09, 85.46) and illegal drug use (OR=73.21; 95% CI: 9.78, 97.83) must have a lower priority in the access to healthcare. Conclusions: The respondents accept the notion of rationing healthcare based on lifestyles. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-19T16:49:23Z 2017-12-19 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Borges, A. P., & Pinho, M. (2017). Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey. Journal of Research in Health Sciences, 17(4), 1-7. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2028 http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2028 Borges, A. P., & Pinho, M. (2017). Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey. Journal of Research in Health Sciences, 17(4), 1-7. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2028 http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2028 |
identifier_str_mv |
Borges, A. P., & Pinho, M. (2017). Should lifestyles be a criterion for healthcare rationing? evidence from a portuguese survey. Journal of Research in Health Sciences, 17(4), 1-7. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2028 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2028 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://journals.umsha.ac.ir/index.php/JRHS/article/view/3554 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134942004772864 |