To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Høiby, N.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Moser, C., Oliver, A., Williams, C., Ramage, G., Borghi, E., Azeredo, Joana, Macia, M. D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/85451
Resumo: Background The work on the ESGB guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections began in 2012 and the result was published in 2014. The guidelines have been and still are frequently cited in the literature proving its usefulness for people working with biofilm infections. At the ESGB Biofilm conference in Mallorca 2022 (Eurobiofilms2022) the board of the ESGB decided to evaluate the 2014-guidelines and relevant publications since 2014 based on a lecture given at the Eurobiofilms2022. Guideline methods The Delphi method for working on production of guidelines and the current ESCMID rules for guidelines are presented. The criteria for evaluation of relevant literature are very strict and especially for treatment, most clinicians and regulatory authorities require convincing results from Level I (randomized controlled trials) publications to justify changes of treatments. The relevant new biofilm literature and the relevant biofilm presentations from the Eurobiofilms meetings and ECCMID conferences was used for evaluating the contemporary relevance of the ESGB 2014 guidelines. Diagnosis of biofilm infections Several infectious diseases have been recognized as biofilm infections since 2014, but the diagnostic methods and therapeutic strategies are still the same as recommended in the 2014 ESGB guidelines which are summarized in this opinion paper. Treatment of biofilm infections Some promising new in vitro and in vivo (animal experiments) observations and reports for therapy of biofilm infections are mentioned, but they still await clinical trials. Conclusion The interim opinion at the present time (2022) is therefore, that the guidelines do not need revision now, but there is a need for survey articles discussing new methods of diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections in order - hopefully to give inspiration to conduct clinical trials which may lead to progress in diagnosis and treatment of patients with biofilm infections.
id RCAP_ab61181262de9d00e03d47e398908ff0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/85451
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB boardBackground The work on the ESGB guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections began in 2012 and the result was published in 2014. The guidelines have been and still are frequently cited in the literature proving its usefulness for people working with biofilm infections. At the ESGB Biofilm conference in Mallorca 2022 (Eurobiofilms2022) the board of the ESGB decided to evaluate the 2014-guidelines and relevant publications since 2014 based on a lecture given at the Eurobiofilms2022. Guideline methods The Delphi method for working on production of guidelines and the current ESCMID rules for guidelines are presented. The criteria for evaluation of relevant literature are very strict and especially for treatment, most clinicians and regulatory authorities require convincing results from Level I (randomized controlled trials) publications to justify changes of treatments. The relevant new biofilm literature and the relevant biofilm presentations from the Eurobiofilms meetings and ECCMID conferences was used for evaluating the contemporary relevance of the ESGB 2014 guidelines. Diagnosis of biofilm infections Several infectious diseases have been recognized as biofilm infections since 2014, but the diagnostic methods and therapeutic strategies are still the same as recommended in the 2014 ESGB guidelines which are summarized in this opinion paper. Treatment of biofilm infections Some promising new in vitro and in vivo (animal experiments) observations and reports for therapy of biofilm infections are mentioned, but they still await clinical trials. Conclusion The interim opinion at the present time (2022) is therefore, that the guidelines do not need revision now, but there is a need for survey articles discussing new methods of diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections in order - hopefully to give inspiration to conduct clinical trials which may lead to progress in diagnosis and treatment of patients with biofilm infections.(undefined)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionElsevierUniversidade do MinhoHøiby, N.Moser, C.Oliver, A.Williams, C.Ramage, G.Borghi, E.Azeredo, JoanaMacia, M. D.2023-12-152023-12-15T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/85451engHøiby, N.; Moser, C.; Oliver, A.; Williams, C.; Ramage, G.; Borghi, E.; Azeredo, Joana; Macia, M. D., To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board. Biofilm, 6(100135), 20232590-207510.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100135100135https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207523000321info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-08-12T01:17:32Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/85451Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:04:02.921454Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board
title To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board
spellingShingle To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board
Høiby, N.
title_short To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board
title_full To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board
title_fullStr To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board
title_full_unstemmed To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board
title_sort To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board
author Høiby, N.
author_facet Høiby, N.
Moser, C.
Oliver, A.
Williams, C.
Ramage, G.
Borghi, E.
Azeredo, Joana
Macia, M. D.
author_role author
author2 Moser, C.
Oliver, A.
Williams, C.
Ramage, G.
Borghi, E.
Azeredo, Joana
Macia, M. D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Høiby, N.
Moser, C.
Oliver, A.
Williams, C.
Ramage, G.
Borghi, E.
Azeredo, Joana
Macia, M. D.
description Background The work on the ESGB guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections began in 2012 and the result was published in 2014. The guidelines have been and still are frequently cited in the literature proving its usefulness for people working with biofilm infections. At the ESGB Biofilm conference in Mallorca 2022 (Eurobiofilms2022) the board of the ESGB decided to evaluate the 2014-guidelines and relevant publications since 2014 based on a lecture given at the Eurobiofilms2022. Guideline methods The Delphi method for working on production of guidelines and the current ESCMID rules for guidelines are presented. The criteria for evaluation of relevant literature are very strict and especially for treatment, most clinicians and regulatory authorities require convincing results from Level I (randomized controlled trials) publications to justify changes of treatments. The relevant new biofilm literature and the relevant biofilm presentations from the Eurobiofilms meetings and ECCMID conferences was used for evaluating the contemporary relevance of the ESGB 2014 guidelines. Diagnosis of biofilm infections Several infectious diseases have been recognized as biofilm infections since 2014, but the diagnostic methods and therapeutic strategies are still the same as recommended in the 2014 ESGB guidelines which are summarized in this opinion paper. Treatment of biofilm infections Some promising new in vitro and in vivo (animal experiments) observations and reports for therapy of biofilm infections are mentioned, but they still await clinical trials. Conclusion The interim opinion at the present time (2022) is therefore, that the guidelines do not need revision now, but there is a need for survey articles discussing new methods of diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections in order - hopefully to give inspiration to conduct clinical trials which may lead to progress in diagnosis and treatment of patients with biofilm infections.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-15
2023-12-15T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1822/85451
url https://hdl.handle.net/1822/85451
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Høiby, N.; Moser, C.; Oliver, A.; Williams, C.; Ramage, G.; Borghi, E.; Azeredo, Joana; Macia, M. D., To update or not to update the ESCMID guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections That is the question! The opinion of the ESGB board. Biofilm, 6(100135), 2023
2590-2075
10.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100135
100135
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207523000321
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132448923058176