Comparative Analysis of Dehydration Methods for Apple Fruit

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nunes, Catarina A.S.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Tânia I.B., Nunes, João M.S.A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.16932
Resumo: Fruit dehydration is a key option for food preservation, in order to increase shelf life and promote exportation. Numerous methods of dehydration have been developed in recent decades. The aim of the present work is to perform an assessment of the dehydration methods used more frequently with apple fruit, and subsequently, compare them as to the conditions of operation (temperature, speed of drying and drying time) and energy aspects (energy requirement and energetic efficiency). The comparative analysis shows that drying with microwave associated with a second method of drying has greater benefits in terms of quality of the final product. In addition, using the two methods it is possible to overcome the limitations of each one used individually. The microwave drying and microwave drying combined with vacuum present the lowest drying times, 0.87-h and 0.28-h, respectively, as opposed to traditional techniques (sun drying and solar drying). In terms of energy efficiency, it was found that among the methods analysed the higher rates were observed for the fluidized bed dryer (28.0-64.0%), microwave drying (79.0%) and drying by infrared radiation (30.0-60.0%). The infrared drying method appears to be the most efficient, presenting lower costs and providing greater benefits in terms of drying times, energy efficiency and, organoleptic and nutritional characteristics of the final product.
id RCAP_abf0b6fc8357810567acb986a597f6bc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/16932
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparative Analysis of Dehydration Methods for Apple FruitAnálise Comparativa de Métodos de Desidratação do Fruto MaçãGeralFruit dehydration is a key option for food preservation, in order to increase shelf life and promote exportation. Numerous methods of dehydration have been developed in recent decades. The aim of the present work is to perform an assessment of the dehydration methods used more frequently with apple fruit, and subsequently, compare them as to the conditions of operation (temperature, speed of drying and drying time) and energy aspects (energy requirement and energetic efficiency). The comparative analysis shows that drying with microwave associated with a second method of drying has greater benefits in terms of quality of the final product. In addition, using the two methods it is possible to overcome the limitations of each one used individually. The microwave drying and microwave drying combined with vacuum present the lowest drying times, 0.87-h and 0.28-h, respectively, as opposed to traditional techniques (sun drying and solar drying). In terms of energy efficiency, it was found that among the methods analysed the higher rates were observed for the fluidized bed dryer (28.0-64.0%), microwave drying (79.0%) and drying by infrared radiation (30.0-60.0%). The infrared drying method appears to be the most efficient, presenting lower costs and providing greater benefits in terms of drying times, energy efficiency and, organoleptic and nutritional characteristics of the final product.A desidratação de frutos é uma opção chave para a conservação alimentar, permitindo aumentar o tempo de conservação e promovendo a exportação. Inúmeros métodos de desidratação foram desenvolvidos nas últimas décadas. O presente artigo tem como principal objetivo realizar uma avaliação técnica relativamente aos métodos mais utilizados na desidratação de frutos. Visa ainda comparar os métodos entre si quanto às condições de operação (temperatura, velocidade de secagem e tempo de secagem) e aspetos energéticos (requisito energético e eficiência energética). Da análise comparativa verificou-se que a secagem por microondas associada a outro método de secagem apresenta maiores benefícios em termos de qualidade do produto final superando-se as limitações de cada um. A secagem por microondas e a secagem por microondas combinado com vácuo são as técnicas que possuem os menores tempos de secagem, 0,87-h e 0,28-h, respetivamente, ao invés das técnicas tradicionais (secagem ao sol e secagem solar). De entre os métodos analisados constatou-se que os que possuem maiores taxas de eficiência energética são o secador de leito fluidizado (28,0-64,0%), secagem por microondas (79,0%), secagem por radiação infravermelha (30,0-60,0%). A secagem por infravermelhos revelou ser a técnica com menores custos, apresentando maiores vantagens ao nível de tempos de secagem, eficiência energética e características organoléticas e nutricionais no produto final.Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal2019-01-24T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.19084/rca.16932eng2183-041X0871-018XNunes, Catarina A.S.Ribeiro, Tânia I.B.Nunes, João M.S.A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-06T09:25:04Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/16932Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:31:11.006941Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative Analysis of Dehydration Methods for Apple Fruit
Análise Comparativa de Métodos de Desidratação do Fruto Maçã
title Comparative Analysis of Dehydration Methods for Apple Fruit
spellingShingle Comparative Analysis of Dehydration Methods for Apple Fruit
Nunes, Catarina A.S.
Geral
title_short Comparative Analysis of Dehydration Methods for Apple Fruit
title_full Comparative Analysis of Dehydration Methods for Apple Fruit
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Dehydration Methods for Apple Fruit
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Dehydration Methods for Apple Fruit
title_sort Comparative Analysis of Dehydration Methods for Apple Fruit
author Nunes, Catarina A.S.
author_facet Nunes, Catarina A.S.
Ribeiro, Tânia I.B.
Nunes, João M.S.A.
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Tânia I.B.
Nunes, João M.S.A.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nunes, Catarina A.S.
Ribeiro, Tânia I.B.
Nunes, João M.S.A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Geral
topic Geral
description Fruit dehydration is a key option for food preservation, in order to increase shelf life and promote exportation. Numerous methods of dehydration have been developed in recent decades. The aim of the present work is to perform an assessment of the dehydration methods used more frequently with apple fruit, and subsequently, compare them as to the conditions of operation (temperature, speed of drying and drying time) and energy aspects (energy requirement and energetic efficiency). The comparative analysis shows that drying with microwave associated with a second method of drying has greater benefits in terms of quality of the final product. In addition, using the two methods it is possible to overcome the limitations of each one used individually. The microwave drying and microwave drying combined with vacuum present the lowest drying times, 0.87-h and 0.28-h, respectively, as opposed to traditional techniques (sun drying and solar drying). In terms of energy efficiency, it was found that among the methods analysed the higher rates were observed for the fluidized bed dryer (28.0-64.0%), microwave drying (79.0%) and drying by infrared radiation (30.0-60.0%). The infrared drying method appears to be the most efficient, presenting lower costs and providing greater benefits in terms of drying times, energy efficiency and, organoleptic and nutritional characteristics of the final product.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-24T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.16932
url https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.16932
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2183-041X
0871-018X
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130177682276352