Private Enforcement and Legal Privilege Versus Convergency
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7478 |
Resumo: | Directive 2014/104/EU has been implemented also in Italy, thus reinforcing the effectiveness of competition law at national level too. Through a “two point” system, therefore public and private enforcement qualify today for complementary means towards the same end. Within such binary system, different issues and topics have been addressed so far by the academic community: from the binding nature of competition authorties decisions to the introduction of the powerful system of assumptions, to the alleviation of the burden of allegation, to the “passing on” rules, to the new role given to competition authorities in general, etc.. The provision devoted to the legal privilege covering the attorney-client communications, instead, has been almost neglected. In the following, the legal privilege will be analyzed in depth, since, thanks to the implementing provision, it will be able to acquire in Italy a renewed relevance in terms of both legal framework and scope of application. |
id |
RCAP_ac28f1b9bacc5d3ab469f3aa2a93b132 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/7478 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Private Enforcement and Legal Privilege Versus ConvergencyDirective 2014/104/EU has been implemented also in Italy, thus reinforcing the effectiveness of competition law at national level too. Through a “two point” system, therefore public and private enforcement qualify today for complementary means towards the same end. Within such binary system, different issues and topics have been addressed so far by the academic community: from the binding nature of competition authorties decisions to the introduction of the powerful system of assumptions, to the alleviation of the burden of allegation, to the “passing on” rules, to the new role given to competition authorities in general, etc.. The provision devoted to the legal privilege covering the attorney-client communications, instead, has been almost neglected. In the following, the legal privilege will be analyzed in depth, since, thanks to the implementing provision, it will be able to acquire in Italy a renewed relevance in terms of both legal framework and scope of application.Universidade Católica Editora2020-04-01T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7478oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/7478Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 4 No 1 (2020); 69-86Market and Competition Law Review; v. 4 n. 1 (2020); 69-862184-000810.34632/mclawreview.2020.4.1reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/7478https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7478https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/7478/8410Copyright (c) 2020 Valeria Falcehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFalce, Valeria2022-09-23T15:10:27Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/7478Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:03:42.199163Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Private Enforcement and Legal Privilege Versus Convergency |
title |
Private Enforcement and Legal Privilege Versus Convergency |
spellingShingle |
Private Enforcement and Legal Privilege Versus Convergency Falce, Valeria |
title_short |
Private Enforcement and Legal Privilege Versus Convergency |
title_full |
Private Enforcement and Legal Privilege Versus Convergency |
title_fullStr |
Private Enforcement and Legal Privilege Versus Convergency |
title_full_unstemmed |
Private Enforcement and Legal Privilege Versus Convergency |
title_sort |
Private Enforcement and Legal Privilege Versus Convergency |
author |
Falce, Valeria |
author_facet |
Falce, Valeria |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Falce, Valeria |
description |
Directive 2014/104/EU has been implemented also in Italy, thus reinforcing the effectiveness of competition law at national level too. Through a “two point” system, therefore public and private enforcement qualify today for complementary means towards the same end. Within such binary system, different issues and topics have been addressed so far by the academic community: from the binding nature of competition authorties decisions to the introduction of the powerful system of assumptions, to the alleviation of the burden of allegation, to the “passing on” rules, to the new role given to competition authorities in general, etc.. The provision devoted to the legal privilege covering the attorney-client communications, instead, has been almost neglected. In the following, the legal privilege will be analyzed in depth, since, thanks to the implementing provision, it will be able to acquire in Italy a renewed relevance in terms of both legal framework and scope of application. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7478 oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/7478 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7478 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/7478 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/7478 https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2020.7478 https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/7478/8410 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Valeria Falce http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Valeria Falce http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Editora |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Editora |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 4 No 1 (2020); 69-86 Market and Competition Law Review; v. 4 n. 1 (2020); 69-86 2184-0008 10.34632/mclawreview.2020.4.1 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130500669898752 |