Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.12662 |
Resumo: | Background: The Nuss procedure has gained acceptance as a safe technique for pectus excavatum repair. Despite being minimally invasive, this procedure is associated with severe postoperative pain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of our perioperative pain control strategies and related complications. Methods: Patients submitted to the Nuss procedure from January 2007 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient’s clinical files were reviewed and the following data was collected: demographic and preoperative auxiliary diagnostic tests, anesthetic and surgical features, pain management, analgesic effectiveness (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS) and related complications. Results: Combined general + epidural anesthesia was performed in 144 patients (98,6%). The T10-T11 epidural space was accessed in 51,4%. Epidural catheter was placed into the epidural space 5 cm (±SD 0,73). The local anesthetic more frequently used was ropivacaine 0,2% (55,5%). Epidural opioids were also used in 74 patients (51,4%). Local anesthetic epidural infusion was initiated 62min (± SD 23,1) after the initial bolus. The analgesia was good or excellent (VAS<5) in 135 patients (93,8%) on the day of epidural catheter´s removal. Analgesia-related complications on patients under epidural analgesia occurred in 40 patients (27,8%): postoperative nausea and vomiting (50%), pruritus (37,5%), hypotension (5%), urinary retention (5%) and Horner syndrome (2,5%). Discussion/Conclusions: Epidural thoracic analgesia, according to the current literature, is the most effective technique for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing Nuss procedure. We confirm the effectiveness of our pain control strategies with low severity complications and no impact on the postoperative course. |
id |
RCAP_aecd6c73ee32c9d03594008c60ebfc17 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/12662 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experienceArtigo de Revisão NarrativaBackground: The Nuss procedure has gained acceptance as a safe technique for pectus excavatum repair. Despite being minimally invasive, this procedure is associated with severe postoperative pain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of our perioperative pain control strategies and related complications. Methods: Patients submitted to the Nuss procedure from January 2007 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient’s clinical files were reviewed and the following data was collected: demographic and preoperative auxiliary diagnostic tests, anesthetic and surgical features, pain management, analgesic effectiveness (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS) and related complications. Results: Combined general + epidural anesthesia was performed in 144 patients (98,6%). The T10-T11 epidural space was accessed in 51,4%. Epidural catheter was placed into the epidural space 5 cm (±SD 0,73). The local anesthetic more frequently used was ropivacaine 0,2% (55,5%). Epidural opioids were also used in 74 patients (51,4%). Local anesthetic epidural infusion was initiated 62min (± SD 23,1) after the initial bolus. The analgesia was good or excellent (VAS<5) in 135 patients (93,8%) on the day of epidural catheter´s removal. Analgesia-related complications on patients under epidural analgesia occurred in 40 patients (27,8%): postoperative nausea and vomiting (50%), pruritus (37,5%), hypotension (5%), urinary retention (5%) and Horner syndrome (2,5%). Discussion/Conclusions: Epidural thoracic analgesia, according to the current literature, is the most effective technique for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing Nuss procedure. We confirm the effectiveness of our pain control strategies with low severity complications and no impact on the postoperative course. Sociedade Portuguesa de Anestesiologia2017-12-14T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.12662eng0871-6099Reis, Lígia Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-23T15:34:43Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/12662Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:04:12.476483Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience |
title |
Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience |
spellingShingle |
Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience Reis, Lígia Silva Artigo de Revisão Narrativa |
title_short |
Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience |
title_full |
Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience |
title_fullStr |
Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience |
title_sort |
Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience |
author |
Reis, Lígia Silva |
author_facet |
Reis, Lígia Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Reis, Lígia Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Artigo de Revisão Narrativa |
topic |
Artigo de Revisão Narrativa |
description |
Background: The Nuss procedure has gained acceptance as a safe technique for pectus excavatum repair. Despite being minimally invasive, this procedure is associated with severe postoperative pain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of our perioperative pain control strategies and related complications. Methods: Patients submitted to the Nuss procedure from January 2007 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient’s clinical files were reviewed and the following data was collected: demographic and preoperative auxiliary diagnostic tests, anesthetic and surgical features, pain management, analgesic effectiveness (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS) and related complications. Results: Combined general + epidural anesthesia was performed in 144 patients (98,6%). The T10-T11 epidural space was accessed in 51,4%. Epidural catheter was placed into the epidural space 5 cm (±SD 0,73). The local anesthetic more frequently used was ropivacaine 0,2% (55,5%). Epidural opioids were also used in 74 patients (51,4%). Local anesthetic epidural infusion was initiated 62min (± SD 23,1) after the initial bolus. The analgesia was good or excellent (VAS<5) in 135 patients (93,8%) on the day of epidural catheter´s removal. Analgesia-related complications on patients under epidural analgesia occurred in 40 patients (27,8%): postoperative nausea and vomiting (50%), pruritus (37,5%), hypotension (5%), urinary retention (5%) and Horner syndrome (2,5%). Discussion/Conclusions: Epidural thoracic analgesia, according to the current literature, is the most effective technique for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing Nuss procedure. We confirm the effectiveness of our pain control strategies with low severity complications and no impact on the postoperative course. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-14T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.12662 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.12662 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0871-6099 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Anestesiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Anestesiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130505233301504 |