Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reis, Lígia Silva
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.12662
Resumo: Background: The Nuss procedure has gained acceptance as a safe technique for pectus excavatum repair. Despite being minimally invasive, this procedure is associated with severe postoperative pain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of our perioperative pain control strategies and related complications. Methods: Patients submitted to the Nuss procedure from January 2007 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient’s clinical files were reviewed and the following data was collected: demographic and preoperative auxiliary diagnostic tests, anesthetic and surgical features, pain management, analgesic effectiveness (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS) and related complications. Results: Combined general + epidural anesthesia was performed in 144 patients (98,6%). The T10-T11 epidural space was accessed in 51,4%. Epidural catheter was placed into the epidural space 5 cm (±SD 0,73). The local anesthetic more frequently used was ropivacaine 0,2% (55,5%). Epidural opioids were also used in 74 patients (51,4%). Local anesthetic epidural infusion was initiated 62min (± SD 23,1) after the initial bolus. The analgesia was good or excellent (VAS<5) in 135 patients (93,8%) on the day of epidural catheter´s removal. Analgesia-related complications on patients under epidural analgesia occurred in 40 patients (27,8%): postoperative nausea and vomiting (50%), pruritus (37,5%), hypotension (5%), urinary retention (5%) and Horner syndrome (2,5%). Discussion/Conclusions: Epidural thoracic analgesia, according to the current literature, is the most effective technique for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing Nuss procedure. We confirm the effectiveness of our pain control strategies with low severity complications and no impact on the postoperative course.   
id RCAP_aecd6c73ee32c9d03594008c60ebfc17
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/12662
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experienceArtigo de Revisão NarrativaBackground: The Nuss procedure has gained acceptance as a safe technique for pectus excavatum repair. Despite being minimally invasive, this procedure is associated with severe postoperative pain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of our perioperative pain control strategies and related complications. Methods: Patients submitted to the Nuss procedure from January 2007 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient’s clinical files were reviewed and the following data was collected: demographic and preoperative auxiliary diagnostic tests, anesthetic and surgical features, pain management, analgesic effectiveness (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS) and related complications. Results: Combined general + epidural anesthesia was performed in 144 patients (98,6%). The T10-T11 epidural space was accessed in 51,4%. Epidural catheter was placed into the epidural space 5 cm (±SD 0,73). The local anesthetic more frequently used was ropivacaine 0,2% (55,5%). Epidural opioids were also used in 74 patients (51,4%). Local anesthetic epidural infusion was initiated 62min (± SD 23,1) after the initial bolus. The analgesia was good or excellent (VAS<5) in 135 patients (93,8%) on the day of epidural catheter´s removal. Analgesia-related complications on patients under epidural analgesia occurred in 40 patients (27,8%): postoperative nausea and vomiting (50%), pruritus (37,5%), hypotension (5%), urinary retention (5%) and Horner syndrome (2,5%). Discussion/Conclusions: Epidural thoracic analgesia, according to the current literature, is the most effective technique for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing Nuss procedure. We confirm the effectiveness of our pain control strategies with low severity complications and no impact on the postoperative course.   Sociedade Portuguesa de Anestesiologia2017-12-14T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.12662eng0871-6099Reis, Lígia Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-23T15:34:43Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/12662Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:04:12.476483Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience
title Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience
spellingShingle Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience
Reis, Lígia Silva
Artigo de Revisão Narrativa
title_short Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience
title_full Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience
title_fullStr Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience
title_sort Analgesic Management of Pectus Excavatum repair in children: a single center experience
author Reis, Lígia Silva
author_facet Reis, Lígia Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reis, Lígia Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artigo de Revisão Narrativa
topic Artigo de Revisão Narrativa
description Background: The Nuss procedure has gained acceptance as a safe technique for pectus excavatum repair. Despite being minimally invasive, this procedure is associated with severe postoperative pain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of our perioperative pain control strategies and related complications. Methods: Patients submitted to the Nuss procedure from January 2007 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient’s clinical files were reviewed and the following data was collected: demographic and preoperative auxiliary diagnostic tests, anesthetic and surgical features, pain management, analgesic effectiveness (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS) and related complications. Results: Combined general + epidural anesthesia was performed in 144 patients (98,6%). The T10-T11 epidural space was accessed in 51,4%. Epidural catheter was placed into the epidural space 5 cm (±SD 0,73). The local anesthetic more frequently used was ropivacaine 0,2% (55,5%). Epidural opioids were also used in 74 patients (51,4%). Local anesthetic epidural infusion was initiated 62min (± SD 23,1) after the initial bolus. The analgesia was good or excellent (VAS<5) in 135 patients (93,8%) on the day of epidural catheter´s removal. Analgesia-related complications on patients under epidural analgesia occurred in 40 patients (27,8%): postoperative nausea and vomiting (50%), pruritus (37,5%), hypotension (5%), urinary retention (5%) and Horner syndrome (2,5%). Discussion/Conclusions: Epidural thoracic analgesia, according to the current literature, is the most effective technique for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing Nuss procedure. We confirm the effectiveness of our pain control strategies with low severity complications and no impact on the postoperative course.   
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-14T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.12662
url https://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.12662
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0871-6099
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Anestesiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Anestesiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130505233301504