Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-107X2016000300009 |
Resumo: | It was our objective to identify the psychometric elements to an epistemological reflection through a systematic review of cross-cultural validation procedures of TGMD-2 batteries, MABC-2 and KTK. Searches were carried out by two evaluators independently without year and language restrictions in six databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, Lilacs, Scopus, Pubmed and The ScientificElectronic Library Online - SciELO. The key words used were: "MABC", "TGMD" and "KTK" all of them combined with the word "validity". There was a total of 734 articles, of which, after the exclusion criteria, remained only 11 studies. It was found that there are differences between the authors in relation to the psychometric factors taken into account in cross-cultural validation. So that there was a lack of unanimity of the validation criteria of all studies in this field. |
id |
RCAP_afa2954fe3e086faced96da7f043aa4d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1646-107X2016000300009 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic reviewEpistemologyPsychometricsMotor AssessmentIt was our objective to identify the psychometric elements to an epistemological reflection through a systematic review of cross-cultural validation procedures of TGMD-2 batteries, MABC-2 and KTK. Searches were carried out by two evaluators independently without year and language restrictions in six databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, Lilacs, Scopus, Pubmed and The ScientificElectronic Library Online - SciELO. The key words used were: "MABC", "TGMD" and "KTK" all of them combined with the word "validity". There was a total of 734 articles, of which, after the exclusion criteria, remained only 11 studies. It was found that there are differences between the authors in relation to the psychometric factors taken into account in cross-cultural validation. So that there was a lack of unanimity of the validation criteria of all studies in this field.Edições Desafio Singular2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-107X2016000300009Motricidade v.12 n.3 2016reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-107X2016000300009Medeiros,Pâmella deZequinão,Marcela AlmeidaFronza,Fernanda CerveiraSantos,João Otacilio Libardoni dosCardoso,Fernando Luizinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:20:06Zoai:scielo:S1646-107X2016000300009Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:27:36.904449Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
title |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review Medeiros,Pâmella de Epistemology Psychometrics Motor Assessment |
title_short |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
title_full |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
title_sort |
Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review |
author |
Medeiros,Pâmella de |
author_facet |
Medeiros,Pâmella de Zequinão,Marcela Almeida Fronza,Fernanda Cerveira Santos,João Otacilio Libardoni dos Cardoso,Fernando Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zequinão,Marcela Almeida Fronza,Fernanda Cerveira Santos,João Otacilio Libardoni dos Cardoso,Fernando Luiz |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medeiros,Pâmella de Zequinão,Marcela Almeida Fronza,Fernanda Cerveira Santos,João Otacilio Libardoni dos Cardoso,Fernando Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Epistemology Psychometrics Motor Assessment |
topic |
Epistemology Psychometrics Motor Assessment |
description |
It was our objective to identify the psychometric elements to an epistemological reflection through a systematic review of cross-cultural validation procedures of TGMD-2 batteries, MABC-2 and KTK. Searches were carried out by two evaluators independently without year and language restrictions in six databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, Lilacs, Scopus, Pubmed and The ScientificElectronic Library Online - SciELO. The key words used were: "MABC", "TGMD" and "KTK" all of them combined with the word "validity". There was a total of 734 articles, of which, after the exclusion criteria, remained only 11 studies. It was found that there are differences between the authors in relation to the psychometric factors taken into account in cross-cultural validation. So that there was a lack of unanimity of the validation criteria of all studies in this field. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-107X2016000300009 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-107X2016000300009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-107X2016000300009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edições Desafio Singular |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edições Desafio Singular |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Motricidade v.12 n.3 2016 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817554229941764096 |